YOUR POVERTY AND YOUR LACK OF AGENCY You’re poor because you lack Agency sure. But you know, even if we remove obstructive institutions, and even if we create institutions to invest in overcoming your initial circumstance, we are still stuck with the fact that we cannot change YOU, and that YOU can lack Agency for your own informational, intellectual, emotional, or physical reasons. We know for certain that you cannot tell if you are able or not. We don’t like to choose whether you are able or not – we can err. All we can do is invest in eliminating impediments so that you can DEMONSTRATE whether you possess agency and ability – or not. Anyone who tells you more money will matter is simply lying to you. You’re poor because you lack Agency, because you or your parents or your ancestors have lacked intellectual, emotional, or physical ABILITY as well as informational (ignorance) or institutional impediment.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
You Don’t Need Pebbles In Your Mouth
LEARNING TO SPEAK INTELLIGENTLY: YOU DON’T NEED TO PUT PEBBLES IN YOUR MOUTH
- Our brains evolved problem solving in order to speak.
- Our minds improve by the act of speaking.
- Our speech improves by problem solving in writing.
The way to improve your speech, is to write about what you think, realize how stupid you sound, and keep working until you no longer sound stupid. Why the hell do you think I spend all my time doing this? lol And why do you think the people who follow me and try to make their own arguments in their own words improve the fastest?
-
You Don’t Need Pebbles In Your Mouth
LEARNING TO SPEAK INTELLIGENTLY: YOU DON’T NEED TO PUT PEBBLES IN YOUR MOUTH
- Our brains evolved problem solving in order to speak.
- Our minds improve by the act of speaking.
- Our speech improves by problem solving in writing.
The way to improve your speech, is to write about what you think, realize how stupid you sound, and keep working until you no longer sound stupid. Why the hell do you think I spend all my time doing this? lol And why do you think the people who follow me and try to make their own arguments in their own words improve the fastest?
-
( There is a reason a phd takes six or seven years, and to be good in a craft or
( There is a reason a phd takes six or seven years, and to be good in a craft or career takes eight to ten. we…. humans…. are….. sloooooowwww. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-22 16:42:00 UTC
-
LEARNING TO SPEAK INTELLIGENTLY: YOU DON’T NEED TO PUT PEBBLES IN YOUR MOUTH Our
LEARNING TO SPEAK INTELLIGENTLY: YOU DON’T NEED TO PUT PEBBLES IN YOUR MOUTH
Our brains evolved problem solving in order to speak.
Our minds improve by the act of speaking.
Our speech improves by problem solving in writing.
The way to improve your speech, is to write about what you think, realize how stupid you sound, and keep working until you no longer sound stupid.
Why the hell do you think I spend all my time doing this? lol
And why do you think the people who follow me and try to make their own arguments in their own words improve the fastest?
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-22 16:21:00 UTC
-
Example. Library, woman shrieks because she can’t find her child for a moment. E
Example.
Library, woman shrieks because she can’t find her child for a moment.
Every man in hearing range is on his feet and moving before her next breath. We don’t even think, we just move.
All the women…. sitting and watching.
Never understand why women are afraid of men in general.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 16:19:00 UTC
-
ANALYSIS OF TIME REQUIRED TO GET READY FOR PRESCHOOL (humor)
ANALYSIS OF TIME REQUIRED TO GET READY FOR PRESCHOOL
(humor)
https://www.getguesstimate.com/models/314
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 16:47:00 UTC
-
The Dimensions of The Pack Response
(Psychology) 1 – as to any ‘beginning’ to the universe, the central question is whether time has any meaning at the extremes. We simply do not know the answer. But we know enough to know, that we do not know the answer. Ergo, any argument to ad-infinitum is no more likely than any argument to singularity because we don’t know if there is a difference. Note that I think in terms of persistence. And so whether there is a beginning to the universe is not as material as whether we persist (survive) the behavior of the universe. 2 – As long as the set of forces that constitute mass-radiation-space-time are constant, there is no reason that the universe or universes do not simply pulse indefinitely, although it is very difficult to say whether they follow in sequence or repeat the same time over and over again. We just don’t know. 3 – there are deep psychological reasons that cause us to seek the psychological safety of the pack in various group activities – and they are chiefly the result of living in large numbers rather than consanguineous bands and tribes. This need exists at the personal subconscious level, the group level(community), and the tribal (regional) level. And religions evolved to assist us in establishing normative expectations of one another on the one hand, and reducing the burden of uncertainty and fear of outsiders and being outside on the other. 4 – As we have seen people seek replacement for talking around the campfire, being read to, watching a play or movie, listening to talking in church, listinening to lectures in university, watching people talk on television. The phenomenon is always the same. 5 – We have seen people able to obtain the feeling of submission of reason to the pack (which is what feels good about religion) by many possible means: disciplined ritual, disciplined though (stoicism’s virtues), disciplined internal conversation (prayer), and disciplined quietude (buddhist meditation). 6 – We have seen people use music and dancing, group runs and walks, organized sports, hunting, festival, holiday, and feast – even parade and war. 7 – Each of these dimensions provides increasing safety of the pack in a world where – since agrarianism – we have existed uncomfortably as individuals. This allows us to ‘rest’ our minds from teh constant effort of reason and our constant battle with uncertainty whenever modernity’s comforting consumptions are insufficient for us to counter alienation that it produces. 8 – The question remains why we must rely on lies (supernatural) rather than myths, legends, and aspirations. There is no reason to rely upon lies, superstitions, and falsehoods – because they are, just like alcohol and drugs, methods of escape and deceit, and self harm. The wonder of being human, of what we have done in our short time, and what we may yet do, is enough for us.
-
The Dimensions of The Pack Response
(Psychology) 1 – as to any ‘beginning’ to the universe, the central question is whether time has any meaning at the extremes. We simply do not know the answer. But we know enough to know, that we do not know the answer. Ergo, any argument to ad-infinitum is no more likely than any argument to singularity because we don’t know if there is a difference. Note that I think in terms of persistence. And so whether there is a beginning to the universe is not as material as whether we persist (survive) the behavior of the universe. 2 – As long as the set of forces that constitute mass-radiation-space-time are constant, there is no reason that the universe or universes do not simply pulse indefinitely, although it is very difficult to say whether they follow in sequence or repeat the same time over and over again. We just don’t know. 3 – there are deep psychological reasons that cause us to seek the psychological safety of the pack in various group activities – and they are chiefly the result of living in large numbers rather than consanguineous bands and tribes. This need exists at the personal subconscious level, the group level(community), and the tribal (regional) level. And religions evolved to assist us in establishing normative expectations of one another on the one hand, and reducing the burden of uncertainty and fear of outsiders and being outside on the other. 4 – As we have seen people seek replacement for talking around the campfire, being read to, watching a play or movie, listening to talking in church, listinening to lectures in university, watching people talk on television. The phenomenon is always the same. 5 – We have seen people able to obtain the feeling of submission of reason to the pack (which is what feels good about religion) by many possible means: disciplined ritual, disciplined though (stoicism’s virtues), disciplined internal conversation (prayer), and disciplined quietude (buddhist meditation). 6 – We have seen people use music and dancing, group runs and walks, organized sports, hunting, festival, holiday, and feast – even parade and war. 7 – Each of these dimensions provides increasing safety of the pack in a world where – since agrarianism – we have existed uncomfortably as individuals. This allows us to ‘rest’ our minds from teh constant effort of reason and our constant battle with uncertainty whenever modernity’s comforting consumptions are insufficient for us to counter alienation that it produces. 8 – The question remains why we must rely on lies (supernatural) rather than myths, legends, and aspirations. There is no reason to rely upon lies, superstitions, and falsehoods – because they are, just like alcohol and drugs, methods of escape and deceit, and self harm. The wonder of being human, of what we have done in our short time, and what we may yet do, is enough for us.
-
Using Horizontal and Vertical Classes
—“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”— Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes. And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes. But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes. And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health. So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other. Curt Doolittle