Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • FIRST RULES OF TEACHING 1 – First Rule of Teaching: Don’t give them the answer.

    FIRST RULES OF TEACHING

    1 – First Rule of Teaching: Don’t give them the answer.

    2 – Second Rule of Teaching: Don’t be boring.

    3 – Third Rule of Teaching: You aren’t a cop, don’t act like one.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-28 15:44:00 UTC

  • you know when a bunch of chicks get together and talk about he said she said? th

    you know when a bunch of chicks get together and talk about he said she said? then another group says the same thing but saying its right or wrong but simply give their feelings about it? then another group says ‘well if everyone did that” (the categorical imperative). And then another group says ‘well, you know, we tried that in 1950s”. And then another group says ‘well, statistically it looks like this’. And then another group says “well, this is the set of options available to them at the time, and this is what their incentives were so that is what they chose because they had only those choices”.

    That’s what I mean by arguing by moral intuition.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-27 12:44:00 UTC

  • COMPARING INTENTIONS VS OUTCOMES You can look at the content or you can look at

    COMPARING INTENTIONS VS OUTCOMES

    You can look at the content or you can look at the method of communication and argument. you can look at the consequences.

    We were the greatest people on earth before christianity. and the greatest people on earth after christianity. And we are being defeated right now by christianity version 2: marxism/postmodernism and islam v1.

    So a silly person looks at the gears inside the box(intentions). The wise person looks at what comes out of the box (consequences).

    The consequences of aristotelianism and confucianism and zoroastrianism and buddhism vs the consequences of judaism, christianity, and islam. It’s not a difficult comparison. Abrahamism is a cancer upon mankind nearly as great as the entire history of plaques and diseases.

    Atheism in practice is just democratic socialism: a variation of marxism: christianity v2.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-27 11:36:00 UTC

  • RT @charlesmurray: A discussion of computer gaming that everyone over 50 needs t

    RT @charlesmurray: A discussion of computer gaming that everyone over 50 needs to read. Much more complicated than “wasting time.” https://…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 18:51:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/879411795810820096

  • Retweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray): A discussion of computer gaming that

    Retweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray):

    A discussion of computer gaming that everyone over 50 needs to read. Much more complicated than “wasting time.” https://t.co/xFB8mef6Kd

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 14:51:00 UTC

  • HARRIS VS PETERSON IN INTELLIGENCE I would like say something politically incorr

    HARRIS VS PETERSON IN INTELLIGENCE

    I would like say something politically incorrect, so if you’ll forgive me I’ll suggest this: is that peterson is a pretty common northern european demonstrating pretty common northern european modeling skills and ‘awareness of the pack’ – or european ‘formation-thought’, whereas Harris is a pretty common ashkenazi demonstrating pretty common verbal and personal awareness skills. And that two people with relatively similar degrees of intelligence (just as in men and women) will tend to master those forms of inquiry and analysis with which they are genetically dominant. There is a reason for example for the distribution of northern european directors and jewish writers. Just as there is a reason for the distribution of east asian engineers and ashkenazi lawyers. And there is a good reason for the asymmetric distribution of western artists and the near absence of ashkenazi arts. Just as, at least in the personality trait of openness (intellectual curiosity) women favor aesthetics and men favor ideas. If you examine the traits of different peoples around the world, most of our differences are reducible to (a) the degree of Neotonic (paedomorphic) selection (domestication), and (b) the distribution of what we consider gender traits between the genders.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 12:36:00 UTC

  • Men are more confident in their knowledge than women. Women are more confident i

    Men are more confident in their knowledge than women. Women are more confident in their opinions than knowledge.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 12:08:00 UTC

  • “Women are made to be loved but they do not seem to know it.”—Francesco Princi

    —“Women are made to be loved but they do not seem to know it.”—Francesco Principi

    (they are too much social climbers and impulsive nesters. never happy with the status quo. always seeking more. men seek an equilibrium that they can tolerate physically, emotionally, and intellectually. women only seek an equilibrium they can tolerate emotionally. The reason being that they can call upon the resources of men to climb. Men are happy when we discover and hold our place in the hierarchy. Women will always seek to climb it. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 10:40:00 UTC

  • FEELING VS KNOWING – THE GREAT GENDER DIVIDE A man’s first instinct is to questi

    FEELING VS KNOWING – THE GREAT GENDER DIVIDE

    A man’s first instinct is to question whether something is true. A woman’s first instinct is to question whether something is desirable. A man’s first instinct is to describe a distribution. A woman’s first instinct is to describe a uniformity. A man’s first instinct is to question whether someone will obtain a valuable advantage. A woman’s first instinct is to question whether someone’s being left behind. In the main, without extraordinary training, women are of zero or negative value in politics for these reasons. They will weaken and destroy a polity. Why? Because women evolved to pre-rationally intuit to a degree we call ‘panic’ whether her offspring will be left behind by the needs of the tribe. And women are less able to disconnect the emotional from the rational in matters political. Women simply possess less agency. And if they didn’t, we wouldn’t exist today.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-26 09:09:00 UTC

  • I mean, it seems like british women are trying to out trailer-park Americans. I

    I mean, it seems like british women are trying to out trailer-park Americans. I can understand not even TRYING to compete with French women, and I can see raising the art of working-class ‘unkempt’ to a virtue signal. But what is going on over there across the pond? Makes the vast trailer park we call Los Angeles look the an Etiquette Academy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-25 17:40:00 UTC