Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make,

    One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make, is in visualizing an ideal man rather than the various men required in a division of specialization in an army, hunting party, or production line. When we worked in armies (militias) we all knew this. When we work on sports teams we know this. When we hunt we know this. When we work under the influence of christianity, classical liberalism, liberalism, marxism, and postmodernism in the industrial and post industrial age – we consider ourselves individuals. All monopoly is bad. it’s intellectual laziness. We must only know the optimum role we can play on the team.

  • One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make,

    One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make, is in visualizing an ideal man rather than the various men required in a division of specialization in an army, hunting party, or production line. When we worked in armies (militias) we all knew this. When we work on sports teams we know this. When we hunt we know this. When we work under the influence of christianity, classical liberalism, liberalism, marxism, and postmodernism in the industrial and post industrial age – we consider ourselves individuals. All monopoly is bad. it’s intellectual laziness. We must only know the optimum role we can play on the team.

  • One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make,

    One of the mistakes our people make – or rather, the men among our people make, is in visualizing an ideal man rather than the various men required in a division of specialization in an army, hunting party, or production line. When we worked in armies (militias) we all knew this. When we work on sports teams we know this. When we hunt we know this. When we work under the influence of christianity, classical liberalism, liberalism, marxism, and postmodernism in the industrial and post industrial age – we consider ourselves individuals.

    All monopoly is bad. it’s intellectual laziness. We must only know the optimum role we can play on the team.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-11 10:25:00 UTC

  • You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy wit

    You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy with Aristocratic Egalitarianism via Duchesne, and I replaced by use of Status Hierarchy with Dominance Hierarchy from Peterson. I still prefer status hierarchy to dominance hierarchy but I like the inclusion of reproduction in the word dominance. I like aristocratic egalitarianism because it gets across the western principle of aristocracy as a market that is open to expansion. “markets in everything”.

  • You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy wit

    You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy with Aristocratic Egalitarianism via Duchesne, and I replaced by use of Status Hierarchy with Dominance Hierarchy from Peterson. I still prefer status hierarchy to dominance hierarchy but I like the inclusion of reproduction in the word dominance. I like aristocratic egalitarianism because it gets across the western principle of aristocracy as a market that is open to expansion. “markets in everything”.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 10:46:00 UTC

  • You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy wit

    You know, I pick up terminology from peers. I replaced my use of Aristocracy with Aristocratic Egalitarianism via Duchesne, and I replaced by use of Status Hierarchy with Dominance Hierarchy from Peterson. I still prefer status hierarchy to dominance hierarchy but I like the inclusion of reproduction in the word dominance. I like aristocratic egalitarianism because it gets across the western principle of aristocracy as a market that is open to expansion. “markets in everything”.

  • Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams. Personall

    Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams. Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality. We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy. We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy. I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains. Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create compleity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive. From simple things emerge complexity.
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/22382356_153984701865095_22341501171

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/22382356_153984701865095_22341501171

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/22382356_153984701865095_2234150117167461519_o_153984701865095.jpg Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams.

    Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality.

    We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy.

    We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy.

    I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains.

    Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create compleity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive.

    From simple things emerge complexity.Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams.

    Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality.

    We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy.

    We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy.

    I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains.

    Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create compleity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive.

    From simple things emerge complexity.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 12:48:00 UTC

  • Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams. Personall

    Here. I’ve combined Kashif’s experiential and my operational diagrams. Personally I simply see one axis and three implementations: 1) reproductive strategy, 2) vocabulary, and 3) temporality. We all justify our reproductive strategies. Our reproductive strategy biases our temporal perception in the division of perception, cognition, negotiation, advocacy, and labor. Our Grammar expresses our negotiation in that division of perception that suits our reproductive strategy. We all need a portfolio of decidability. Our decidability is reducible to our reproductive strategy, compromised by our survival and operating strategy. I think the hard thing to imagine is the dream state (associating) action state (planning) spectrum. How action oriented or experience oriented we are. If you put that as a fourth criteria it would probably mirror the solipsistic autistic spectrum that mirrors the construction of female to male brains. Nature works with a very small number of rules that can be used to create compleity through vast permutation. As far as I know all human behavior consists of the prey drive, from which we evolved the mating drive, the cooperating drive is an extension of the mating drive, and the linguistic drive (order) is an outgrowth of the cooperating drive. From simple things emerge complexity.

  • Everyone seeks an evolutionary strategy that increases their potential for the c

    Everyone seeks an evolutionary strategy that increases their potential for the consumption of opportunities. They do not seek truth. Some of us seek truth because it increases our potential for the consumption of opportunities. The difference is that some opportunities are physical, some reproductive, some material, some experiential, and some intellectual, and intellectuals prefer accumulating knowledge (power) as their preferred asset. Thankfully it is cheap, but time consuming. 　 I don’t seek to convert. I seek to produce a product I can sell to people who want to increase their physical, reproductive, material, and experiential opportunities for acquisition. The intellectual reward is merely my compensation for producing that set of ideas. Hopefully a revolution comes from it. 😉