Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • We like, we want, we think we need many things. But like sugar, religion, and he

    We like, we want, we think we need many things. But like sugar, religion, and heroin, we often choose poorly – we love our drugs.

  • GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mother

    GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mothers: teach rallying to opportunity by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the non-productive, but consumptive. TRADE: Scientists, Engineers, Entrepreneurs, Financiers rally to opportunities for profit by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the productive. FORCE: Kings, Generals, Judges, Warriors, Sheriff’s prevent rallying to non-productive opportunities. They tend to rally against the unproductive (parasitic, predatory).

  • GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mother

    GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mothers: teach rallying to opportunity by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the non-productive, but consumptive.

    TRADE: Scientists, Engineers, Entrepreneurs, Financiers rally to opportunities for profit by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the productive.

    FORCE: Kings, Generals, Judges, Warriors, Sheriff’s prevent rallying to non-productive opportunities. They tend to rally against the unproductive (parasitic, predatory).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-03 11:07:00 UTC

  • GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mother

    GOSSIP: Priests, Politicians, Public Intellectuals, Professors, Teachers, Mothers: teach rallying to opportunity by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the non-productive, but consumptive. TRADE: Scientists, Engineers, Entrepreneurs, Financiers rally to opportunities for profit by the use of numbers. They tend to rally to the productive. FORCE: Kings, Generals, Judges, Warriors, Sheriff’s prevent rallying to non-productive opportunities. They tend to rally against the unproductive (parasitic, predatory).

  • “Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding

    —“Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding than predation or boycott?”— Oliver Wescott ||Unaware-no_oppy > Aware-oppy(Boycott, Cooperation, Predation) The profitability of any set of interactions is contingent upon the time value of boycott, cooperation, or predation, in some combination. In general, boycott preserves opportunity for future cooperation, cooperation increases the opportunity for future cooperation, and predation decreases the opportunity for future cooperation. In general, the value of predation increases with the advantage of some form of power, the chance of success, and the sustainability of a pool of available prey. The value of predation decreases with the chance of failure or retaliation, and the unsustainability of a pool of available prey. As an economic system, the domestication of the animal man (aryanism) which applied the domestication of animals to humans through the developmental sequence slave > serf > freeman > citizen > sovereign, was the most successful in history.

  • “Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding

    —“Is cooperation with the natural dominance (competence) hierarchy more rewarding than predation or boycott?”— Oliver Wescott ||Unaware-no_oppy > Aware-oppy(Boycott, Cooperation, Predation) The profitability of any set of interactions is contingent upon the time value of boycott, cooperation, or predation, in some combination. In general, boycott preserves opportunity for future cooperation, cooperation increases the opportunity for future cooperation, and predation decreases the opportunity for future cooperation. In general, the value of predation increases with the advantage of some form of power, the chance of success, and the sustainability of a pool of available prey. The value of predation decreases with the chance of failure or retaliation, and the unsustainability of a pool of available prey. As an economic system, the domestication of the animal man (aryanism) which applied the domestication of animals to humans through the developmental sequence slave > serf > freeman > citizen > sovereign, was the most successful in history.

  • BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperatio

    |BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperation drive > personality > intuition > reason > calculation > computation > markets > symmetries.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-02 11:01:00 UTC

  • BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperatio

    |BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperation drive > personality > intuition > reason > calculation > computation > markets > symmetries.

  • BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperatio

    |BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive > cooperation drive > personality > intuition > reason > calculation > computation > markets > symmetries.

  • We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy ada

    We should thank female hypergamy for our existence. It’s just not a strategy adapted to a society without adult males. The feminine endgame is not the c*ck carousel but to be a nurturing mother, grandmother and wife. A woman’s strategy to reach that place is hypergamy; to attract as much male attention and company as possible, as flagrantly as is permitted, so that she competitively maximizes her market demand as well as the market availability of males, until she is taken in possession by a deserving patriarch. It gets ugly when there are no such males. Hypergamy is not a stable evolutionary strategy without male dominance, which has been a ubiquitous feature of human existence, throughout and beyond the time of our existence. Sans the role of the responsible father and husband, males get to choose between being a beta cuck and an irresponsible thug. I know which one is reproductively more successful when contraception runs short — no, the future is not feminine.