– Just read **The Righteous Mind** by Jonathan Haidt.
– Then read **The Essential Difference **by Simon Baron Cohen.
– Then read **Thinking Fast and Slow **by Daniel Kahneman.
– Then read **Explaining Postmodernism** by Stephen Hicks.
(a) liberalism (female-child: parasitism upon capital), libertarianism (marginal male: innovation in capital), conservatism (established male: conservation of capital) differences in moral perception are genetically granted to us and reinforced by a lifetime of experience.
(b) Conservatives can understand everyone but disagree. Libertarians can understand themselves and conservatives. Liberals (leftists) can only understand themselves.
(c) Liberals argue in psychologists, consensus over truth, and blame (short term consumption). LIbertarians argue in truth, voluntarism, and economics(medium term production, and profits.) Conservatives argue in intertemporal and unfortunately vague terms (“what happens if everyone does this?”) When they should be arguing in the language of capital.
(c) we have very little control over altering this process as it’s a reproductive necessity
(d) By specializing in the reproductive, productive, and capital time cycles, we divide the labor of sense-perception, work, and advocacy, and by voluntary cooperation we calculate the optimum possible at any given moment, without having to understand ‘everything from everyone’s position in the demand cycle.”
In simple terms, the female and underclass reproductive strategy is to control reproduction, production, and evolution by dysgenia, and the male is to control them by eugenia. And until we can look darwin in the face, we will continue to battle between the female/preisthood/underclass, and the male/aristocracy/middle class forever.
The history of western civilization’s successin the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds is that we have, aside from the chinese, produced the most eugenic civilization. So much so that by the late middle ages, we had dramatically shifted the median of the population more fully into the emiddle classes than any in history (not counting the distribution under slavery)>
For most of the 18–19th and up until … max of 1940, there was underutilized human capital in european civilization. But since about 1940, if not 1890, that’s not been true. Most of the remaining undeveloped world is burdened by an excessively left distributed underclass that is not underutilized, and possibly cannot now be utilized. The reason being that we have gone from many multiples of return on investment to a maximum of about ten, and this appears to be a declining trend.
So the future, with a huge underclass, leaves only really, Japan and maybe coastal china, safe from the hordes.
Liberalism has been a cancer.
We had the perfect government:
0 – A Universal Militia (shareholders whose share was purchased by risk)
1 – A judge of last resort (king)
2 – An independent judiciary and rule of law under the law of reciprocity.
3 – A house for each of the natural classes (church, commons, nobility, king)
4 – And a market for polities, commons, production, reproduction, cooperation, and association.
And we blew it. Democracy was nothing but a means of bourgeois seizure of power. And the long term transformation from rule of law, to rule by credit.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Liberals, Libertarians, And Conservatives.
– Just read **The Righteous Mind** by Jonathan Haidt. – Then read **The Essential Difference **by Simon Baron Cohen. – Then read **Thinking Fast and Slow **by Daniel Kahneman. – Then read **Explaining Postmodernism** by Stephen Hicks. (a) liberalism (female-child: parasitism upon capital), libertarianism (marginal male: innovation in capital), conservatism (established male: conservation of capital) differences in moral perception are genetically granted to us and reinforced by a lifetime of experience. (b) Conservatives can understand everyone but disagree. Libertarians can understand themselves and conservatives. Liberals (leftists) can only understand themselves. (c) Liberals argue in psychologists, consensus over truth, and blame (short term consumption). LIbertarians argue in truth, voluntarism, and economics(medium term production, and profits.) Conservatives argue in intertemporal and unfortunately vague terms (“what happens if everyone does this?”) When they should be arguing in the language of capital. (c) we have very little control over altering this process as it’s a reproductive necessity (d) By specializing in the reproductive, productive, and capital time cycles, we divide the labor of sense-perception, work, and advocacy, and by voluntary cooperation we calculate the optimum possible at any given moment, without having to understand ‘everything from everyone’s position in the demand cycle.” In simple terms, the female and underclass reproductive strategy is to control reproduction, production, and evolution by dysgenia, and the male is to control them by eugenia. And until we can look darwin in the face, we will continue to battle between the female/preisthood/underclass, and the male/aristocracy/middle class forever. The history of western civilization’s successin the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds is that we have, aside from the chinese, produced the most eugenic civilization. So much so that by the late middle ages, we had dramatically shifted the median of the population more fully into the emiddle classes than any in history (not counting the distribution under slavery)> For most of the 18–19th and up until … max of 1940, there was underutilized human capital in european civilization. But since about 1940, if not 1890, that’s not been true. Most of the remaining undeveloped world is burdened by an excessively left distributed underclass that is not underutilized, and possibly cannot now be utilized. The reason being that we have gone from many multiples of return on investment to a maximum of about ten, and this appears to be a declining trend. So the future, with a huge underclass, leaves only really, Japan and maybe coastal china, safe from the hordes. Liberalism has been a cancer. We had the perfect government: 0 – A Universal Militia (shareholders whose share was purchased by risk) 1 – A judge of last resort (king) 2 – An independent judiciary and rule of law under the law of reciprocity. 3 – A house for each of the natural classes (church, commons, nobility, king) 4 – And a market for polities, commons, production, reproduction, cooperation, and association. And we blew it. Democracy was nothing but a means of bourgeois seizure of power. And the long term transformation from rule of law, to rule by credit. -
THE RULE OF FIVES You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold ab
THE RULE OF FIVES
You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold about five items in visual space at any time without resorting to groupings or organizing into grids of one sort or the other.
You might have heard that the average person sort of maxes out at remembering a phone number. And that phone numbers are only memorable if broken into a series of numbers each of which consists of less than seven digits.
WE can, like mnemonic sentences, poetry, lyrics, or melodies, repeat patterns and recall elements in a series within that pattern, but we cannot very often recall strings of words or numbers without iterating the series.
If you look at our language, (english), you will find that most of our verbs describe five to seven states:
1) is doing now
2-3) was just doing, will just do
4-5) was doing, will do
6-7) was always done, wll always do
And even so, ‘just doing now’ is a construction. Most of our terms only provide for five states.
We need about five ‘registers’ (states) in order to compare two possible courses of action.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 14:14:00 UTC
-
The Rule Of Fives
You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold about five items in visual space at any time without resorting to groupings or organizing into grids of one sort or the other. You might have heard that the average person sort of maxes out at remembering a phone number. And that phone numbers are only memorable if broken into a series of numbers each of which consists of less than seven digits. WE can, like mnemonic sentences, poetry, lyrics, or melodies, repeat patterns and recall elements in a series within that pattern, but we cannot very often recall strings of words or numbers without iterating the series. If you look at our language, (english), you will find that most of our verbs describe five to seven states: 1) is doing now 2-3) was just doing, will just do 4-5) was doing, will do 6-7) was always done, wll always do And even so, ‘just doing now’ is a construction. Most of our terms only provide for five states. We need about five ‘registers’ (states) in order to compare two possible courses of action. -
The Rule Of Fives
You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold about five items in visual space at any time without resorting to groupings or organizing into grids of one sort or the other. You might have heard that the average person sort of maxes out at remembering a phone number. And that phone numbers are only memorable if broken into a series of numbers each of which consists of less than seven digits. WE can, like mnemonic sentences, poetry, lyrics, or melodies, repeat patterns and recall elements in a series within that pattern, but we cannot very often recall strings of words or numbers without iterating the series. If you look at our language, (english), you will find that most of our verbs describe five to seven states: 1) is doing now 2-3) was just doing, will just do 4-5) was doing, will do 6-7) was always done, wll always do And even so, ‘just doing now’ is a construction. Most of our terms only provide for five states. We need about five ‘registers’ (states) in order to compare two possible courses of action. -
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-28 17:39:00 UTC
-
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’. -
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’
Speech is a low bar for ‘human’. -
MEN IN PRISON AND WOMEN IN ASYLUMS There is a reason prisons are dominated by me
MEN IN PRISON AND WOMEN IN ASYLUMS
There is a reason prisons are dominated by men, and asylums were dominated by women: that distribution reflects how men and women express anti-social behavior.
(Institutionalizing female insanity as a norm.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-27 11:21:00 UTC
-
Men In Prison And Women In Asylums
There is a reason prisons are dominated by men, and asylums were dominated by women: that distribution reflects how men and women express anti-social behavior. (Institutionalizing female insanity as a norm.)