Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • “Q: Do the Jews (or all Middle Easterners) behave as they do intentionally or is

    –“Q: Do the Jews (or all Middle Easterners) behave as they do intentionally or is it just that most have left wing institutes.”–

    Incentives and Iintention: a group follows its instincts and intuitions, it’s culture reinforces those intuitions, and elites in that culture evolve to advance the interests of those intuitions.

    Biological Origin: The evolutionary sequence of the leftist ideology (religion, cult):

    … |Causality|: Sex differences in perception, cognitition, valuation > Female bias > Feminine Bias (verbal, hyperconsumptive, responsibility evading, pretentiously devoted in time instead of demonstrably loyal over time) > Jewish bias (ethnic group strategy) > Abrahamic religious bias (cult) > Marxist pseudoscientific bias (cult) > leftist ideolgical bias (cult).

    … ie: it’s genetic and cultural and the culture has cause reinforcement of the bias in the genes and elites evolve to expertiese in advancing those interests, and some of those elites knowingly do so and organize to do so with intent (Frankfurt school etc). The traits are visible even after mutliple generations of outbreeding.

    Reply addressees: @MaximusVesuvius @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 23:45:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742693642379075584

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742676582597038347

  • Not an argument. Instead, a demonstration that I am correct in that the feminine

    Not an argument. Instead, a demonstration that I am correct in that the feminine mind whether in the male or female body evades adult rational empircal argument by the pretense her approval is a fact rather than a valuation.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 23:36:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742691532556444072

    Reply addressees: @MalignantBumHol @AutistocratMS @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742678478317601106

  • The capacity to learn is hereditary, but all animals except a very few at the ma

    The capacity to learn is hereditary, but all animals except a very few at the margin can be trained. Even humans. It’s just that the cost increases with the decrease in neotenic evolution and or class.

    @ThruTheHayes
    Please contribute one of your dog vs human training examples here. Not just for this fellow but so I can save it and quote you given that this false objection comes up all to regularly.

    Manners are imitation. The rest is intelligence. Even kids with 60IQ’s can be taught exceptional manners. In fact, that’s about all that’s necessary for them to successfully survive in society despite their deficits.

    The same is true for dogs. To train a Siberian Husky ,which is not all that dissimilar from a house cat, is possible, it’s just a LOT more work than training a golden or labrador retriever.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @bleahhhhhhhhh1


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:17:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742671428854407168

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742669862692884734

  • Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someo

    Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someone can be taught manners, may not in fact, produce infinte resistance to antisocial or criminal impulse, nor does success in adopting those manners guarrantee literacy, reading comprehension, learning without excessive repetition, the capacity to use logic of even the first order, or the learning of abstact concepts. It’s just imitation. I would say that many of the southern blacks raised in teh church with stable families have far better manners than self congratulatory whites.

    Perhaps this is yet another example of my capacity to disambiguate a class into a specrum of qualities, which is, in itself a capacity of observation, evidence, reason and the occasional application of basic logic. But that does not mean that we should, as does the left, engage in INFLATION (lying) to claim a general principle of a class is specific to all members of the class. Just because more whites are over 115IQ (which is probably the beginning of the smart fraction), does not mean that all whites are capable of 115IQ, suppression of impulse, self regulation, avoidance of antisocial or criminal, seditious, or treasonous behavior. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    (not that I don’t respect your leadership for those who lack the ability to judge such things, but that is different from resspecting my audience of those who possess that aability to judge such things. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Love you brother. But we only need to head in the same genral direction to save our people, not follow the same exact route. And some of us seek to save the rest of mankind as well. (Or at least most of them.) ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:13:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742670501896429568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742653382601646150

  • Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someo

    Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someone can be taught manners, may not in fact, produce infinte resistance to antisocial or criminal impulse, nor does success in adopting those manners guarrantee literacy, reading comprehension, learning without excessive repetition, the capacity to use logic of even the first order, or the learning of abstact concepts. It’s just imitation. I would say that many of the southern blacks raised in teh church with stable families have far better manners than self congratulatory whites.

    Perhaps this is yet another example of my capacity to disambiguate a class into a specrum of qualities, which is, in itself a capacity of observation, evidence, reason and the occasional application of basic logic. But that does not mean that we should, as does the left, engage in INFLATION (lying) to claim a general principle of a class is specific to all members of the class. Just because more whites are over 115IQ (which is probably the beginning of the smart fraction), does not mean that all whites are capable of 115IQ, suppression of impulse, self regulation, avoidance of antisocial or criminal, seditious, or treasonous behavior. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    (not that I don’t respect your leadership for those who lack the ability to judge such things, but that is different from resspecting my audience of those who possess that aability to judge such things. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Love you brother. But we only need to head in the same genral direction to save our people, not follow the same exact route. And some of us seek to save the rest of mankind as well. (Or at least most of them.) ๐Ÿ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:13:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742670501401559040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742653382601646150

  • This really bothers me. Because it is possible. The differences between us in th

    This really bothers me. Because it is possible. The differences between us in these matters is a function of training (discipline) not ability. https://twitter.com/AliceTeller/status/1742631757050945606

  • RT @NoahRevoy: High T men instinctively know where they fit in a hierarchy. Quic

    RT @NoahRevoy: High T men instinctively know where they fit in a hierarchy.

    Quickly finding your place keeps the peace, lets you start addโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 19:54:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742635486043111471

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN

    RT @curtdoolittle: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN SUCH CONFLICT – AND WHY ARE WE FAILING AS A CIVILIZATION Bโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 16:36:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742585696169161075

  • WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN SUCH CONFLICT – AND WHY ARE WE FAILING AS A CIVILIZATIO

    WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN SUCH CONFLICT – AND WHY ARE WE FAILING AS A CIVILIZATION BECAUSE OF IT?
    We have attempted to reverse the totality of human evolutionary history by the comingling of men and women outside of their spheres of perceptua-valuative-cognitive-emotional capacities. Until very recent times, men and women lived very different lives, with men spending most of their time with men, women with women and children, in a division of labor necessary to insure the care of both as they age – even more, necessary for a woman to exit the servitude of her parents which doomed her to poverty in old age. And for men to find care and comfort of ‘the nest’ when men absorb the majority of cellular damage on behalf of the polity.

    This experiment is failing – and hard. Women are incapable of the adversarial conditions necessary for economic, political, and strategic competition sufficient to preserve comparative advantage regardless of scale. in other words, women, at least at other than the margin – are incapable of the cognitive and psychological demands of continous self regulation of emotion, impuse, and thought by exercise of reason and dependence upon material facts, to not only preserve but advance adverstarial competition, and in particularly to organize adversarial compeitive networks at industrial, political, and strategic scale.

    The opposite occurs: we are declining in competitive comptency by every measure with every influence of teh feminine temperament in organizations larger than a knitting circle – and certaily beyond the Dunbar number.

    Women are petty creatures so that they can empathize with and train children more petty than they, just as men are far less petty creatures so that they can empathize and LIMIT the pettiness of women such that aversarial competition can ‘compute by trial and error’ the defeat of the dark forces of others, time, and ignorance in the endless evolutionary battle to discover increasing means of energy conversion per capital that we call ‘ongoing prosperity’. There is no stable state that women so desperately seek. There is only the hamster wheel of time which we must outpace or return to the poverty of our past.

    This isn’t a moral statement. It’s just the results of the physical sciences, of which we are all expressions. Sorry.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 16:36:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742585669757628416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742569305592709340

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy We are never equal. We ar

    RT @curtdoolittle: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy We are never equal. We are somewhere between incompatible, compatible, or extraordinโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 16:23:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742582412175888400