Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
The Third Secret Of Learning Propertarianism
Acquisitionism: All humans seek to acquire ‘experiences’ and those experiences consist entirely of reactions to the acquisition of opportunities for calories, discounts on calories, or calories. (Really). When composing a sentence in operational grammar, express not emotions (which are not causal but reactions) and instead, the change in state of calories (assets, property, consumption) that the individual desires to obtain. All psychology is an attempt at imposing guilt over violation of a feminine norm. Acquisitionism neutralizes the falsehoods in pseudoscience (psychology, sociology), and pseud-ethics (moral pretense), by illustrating that everyone is merely engaging in bargaining, and doing so by productive, fully informed, warrantied, exchange free of imposition of cost upon the investments of others – OR NOT. I have listed all the things we wish to acquire elsewhere. If we have an emotional reaction, it is our pre-human mind’s judgement of gain or loss of calories (assets of all kinds). Period. -
The Third Secret Of Learning Propertarianism
Acquisitionism: All humans seek to acquire ‘experiences’ and those experiences consist entirely of reactions to the acquisition of opportunities for calories, discounts on calories, or calories. (Really). When composing a sentence in operational grammar, express not emotions (which are not causal but reactions) and instead, the change in state of calories (assets, property, consumption) that the individual desires to obtain. All psychology is an attempt at imposing guilt over violation of a feminine norm. Acquisitionism neutralizes the falsehoods in pseudoscience (psychology, sociology), and pseud-ethics (moral pretense), by illustrating that everyone is merely engaging in bargaining, and doing so by productive, fully informed, warrantied, exchange free of imposition of cost upon the investments of others – OR NOT. I have listed all the things we wish to acquire elsewhere. If we have an emotional reaction, it is our pre-human mind’s judgement of gain or loss of calories (assets of all kinds). Period. -
Conservatives Are More Attractive Than Liberals
(we’ve known this forever, but yet another study) Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs Rolfe Daus Peterson (a1) and Carl L. Palmer (a2) Access Volume 36, Issue 2 Fall 2017 , pp. 3-16 https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.18Published online: 27 December 2017 Abstract Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the “halo effect” are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics. -
Conservatives Are More Attractive Than Liberals
(we’ve known this forever, but yet another study) Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs Rolfe Daus Peterson (a1) and Carl L. Palmer (a2) Access Volume 36, Issue 2 Fall 2017 , pp. 3-16 https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.18Published online: 27 December 2017 Abstract Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the “halo effect” are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics. -
CONSERVATIVES ARE MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN LIBERALS (we’ve known this forever, but y
CONSERVATIVES ARE MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN LIBERALS
(we’ve known this forever, but yet another study)
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs
Rolfe Daus Peterson (a1) and Carl L. Palmer (a2)
Access Volume 36, Issue 2 Fall 2017 , pp. 3-16
https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.18Published online: 27 December 2017
Abstract
Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the “halo effect” are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-27 16:20:00 UTC
-
My answer to What is the underlying psychological reason for racism? Looking dif
My answer to What is the underlying psychological reason for racism? Looking different is a part of it, but there m… https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-underlying-psychological-reason-for-racism-Looking-different-is-a-part-of-it-but-there-must-be-more-to-it/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=60b9def9
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-27 02:56:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957084840469434368
-
My answer to Why do people discriminate others but dislike it when they are disc
My answer to Why do people discriminate others but dislike it when they are discriminated? https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-discriminate-others-but-dislike-it-when-they-are-discriminated/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=fcb03d89
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-27 01:20:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957060631479406592
-
My answer to As a white person, can you describe a personal realization that you
My answer to As a white person, can you describe a personal realization that you were treating minorities different… https://www.quora.com/As-a-white-person-can-you-describe-a-personal-realization-that-you-were-treating-minorities-differently-than-other-whites-and-what-you-did-to-make-a-change/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b0c4d302
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-27 01:05:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/957056860028391430
-
Is Being Racist Edgy?
You know, I have built a reputation out of answering the uncomfortable questions using the language of economics to explain human evolution, development, behavior, and thought.
And providing uncomfortable but true information is always ‘edgy’. And working on ‘edgy’ subjects draws attention.
Despite writing rather prolifically against racism (particularly racism against whites), I have ended up as a bit of a …. spokesman on the matter, quite by accident.
And honestly it’s not something I care for.
The truth is I hate the subject, I don’t care if I’m edgy, I just want to know the truth. And the truth is that every single claim of racism is just a postmodern form of ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying.
The fact is that steriotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences.
So what will we do to change the fact that stereotypes are profoundly accurate descriptions of behavioral distributions among people with similar features. The reason is very simple: the scale of the underclasses of warmer climates that did not undergo manorialism is larger than the scale of the underclasses of the colder climates that went through manorialism (west europe, and east asia).
Agrarianism was a genetic meat grinder. It made a profound difference. And the plague, and hte fact that europeans hanged so significatn proportions of the population every year, and the east asians (chinese) used the axe with equal profligacy let the middle classes move downward and create higher median distributions of abilities and behaviors.
https://www.quora.com/Is-being-racist-edgy
-
I Hate Racism And Denialism Is Just More Of It
I thought racism was a stereotype, and that stereotypes were the most accurate measure in the social sciences, if not the ONLY accurate measure in the social sciences. (It is). I thought that median distributions of behaviors varied dramatically between races, subraces, classes, and genders, and that stereotypes were accuate measurements of such because they are almost impossible to change due to constant exposure to evidence. I thought that the Marxists Postmodernists who have engaged in this pseudoscientific nonsense that there are no differences between genders, classes, subraces, and races were trained in pseudoscience, and didn’t hold STEM degrees or demonstrate scientific testimony. Denial is just another form of lying. Pseudoscience is just another false religion. It’s stupid to treat individuals by the properties of a class. It is stupid to treat a class by the properties of an individual. It is sensible to treat a class by the properties of a class. It is sensible to treat and individual by the properties of the individual. I absolutely hate racism – and the one way to insure it is to deny our differences. Because it prevents us from dealing with the fact that it is not RACES that matter but the sizes of the middle and UNDERCLASSES in each of the races relative to host populations that matters. The upper classes and upper middle classes all get along fine – we are all Aristotelians, Anglo Rule of Law, and Mengerian Economists out of necessity in the preservation of our roles. And please stop hating on white people. We did drag all your ignorant, superstitious, impulsive, hard-laboring, impoverished, starving, diseased, and violent races, subraces, tribes, clans and families, out of your no less than five thousand years of primitivism against your will – all the while, kicking and screaming and complaining like you are now. And all your pseudoscientific pseudo-rational revisionist historicism can never change that fact. Be grateful. We don’t even want your appreciation. Just stop lying. It’s really, really, simple. You were not oppressed. You had failed. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine