Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

For some reason you are missing the point, and stuck on some prior somehow in a way that I can’t quite put my finger on.

Here is what we are doing:
1) races demonstrate significant differences phenotypical, biological, and cognitive expression. As Reich stated we must come to terms with this despite the postwar ‘war’ against darwin and malthus in response to the radical eugenics program in germany (despite the success of the softer version in the progressive american states).
2) those race and subrace differences are due to neotenic evolution as man spread out into new geographic regions allowing isolation and speciation not possible in africa. Neoteny is the primary direction of human evolution over te past two million years.
3) The purpose of the genetics in this context is to understand the history of those evolutionary differences and the admixtures that exist today – so that we understnd the differences in measurements we observe in populations.
So we are trying to explain why there are these differences between groups, and how they came about and how the data reflects those differences.
Furthermore, in my work and my organization’s work this is why we advance ‘let a thousand nations bloom” because small homogenous polities allied in federations for dispute resolution, trade policy, and defense allows different polities to produce different commons to accomodate the different demographic composition of their populations.

Or in simple terms we are reversing theh postwar pseudoscientific propaganda that has given us cultural marxist, sex marxism, race marxism, and now woke – all of which are simply revolts against darwin.

It’s taking us a long time to overcome the decades of pseudoscience. As your comments illustrate.

Reply addressees: @Banjoder @99MO23