Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek

    You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976176050945384448

    Reply addressees: @4everNeverTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976156561398628354

  • You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek

    You know, I still don’t understand why we don’t give men like Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, Donald Trump, and Jack Kennedy who ‘bag’ a lot of social climbers, their own walk of fame. I mean, theses guys are our heroes: Women jump at every opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 19:17:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976175956317626368

    Reply addressees: @NewYorker @RonanFarrow

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NewYorker

    Revisit @RonanFarrow on the former Playboy model Karen McDougal’s story, which provides a detailed look at the way Donald Trump and his allies used clandestine hotel-room meetings, payoffs, and complex legal agreements to keep his affairs out of the press: https://t.co/sHCI6VfPPx https://t.co/ESZRKE3Vae

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976155643127189505

  • (taunts to a prole girl) You have clearly never had responsibility, power, or we

    (taunts to a prole girl)

    You have clearly never had responsibility, power, or wealth, because if you did, you’d understand that competition just makes the entire process more exciting. The weak worry. The strong bait the weak for amusement while they achieve their goals.

    Now, you see, name calling, is an admission that one cannot participate in a discourse because of inadequate vocabulary, available knowledge, available paradigms, and the ability to organize them into a set of constant relations that we call ‘argument’ – what humans do.

    When the underclass decides that it will violate the class contract for peaceful negotiations and resorts to name calling, shaming and rallying, it is the upper class’ responsibility -the obligation of the nobility- to exercise good paternal judgment and discipline the children.

    While it is the fashion in this era to act out the pretense of humoring the peasantry, for those of us with long family histories and centuries of responsibility to bear the high cost of Paternal exercise in defense of the normative commons the peasantry takes for granted.

    Now, any good parent, relative, kin, neighbor or nobility will exercise some modicum of patience – usually to let the children vent their energies – at some time we must invest a bit of our energies in necessary disciplinary action. otherwise the children will never mature.

    And one of the lessons that we can best provide is to make an example of a particularly infantile child just to remind the rest of the vermin that grownups do exist, and there is a limit to our paternal tolerance.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 18:36:00 UTC

  • FALSE. Personality Traits (the big five) neutralize differences between genders

    FALSE. Personality Traits (the big five) neutralize differences between genders and classes. This is why the discipline has (a) developed the dimensions (compositions) for each of those traits,(b) mapped those traits to our biology (reward systems). Because Big-5 hid differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-20 18:17:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976160901303865344

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976039826192584704


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Personality traits account for only 5% of the individual differences in political orientation. https://t.co/7PiyHQQxpJ https://t.co/MfFX5SQtD7

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/976039826192584704

  • Reported and demonstrated behavior are often polar opposites. in your case i can

    Reported and demonstrated behavior are often polar opposites. in your case i can tell from two tweets you by no means possess the agency to either control your emotions or honestly predict your behavior.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 21:47:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975851276864032769

    Reply addressees: @MikeMischnick @lucy_castille @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975849591177441280


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MikeMischnick

    @curtdoolittle @lucy_castille @realDonaldTrump I’m not the head of the government… if the government comes after me, I’m not obstructing justice by saying the investigation should be stopped because I have no power to stop it…. Also, If I hadn’t done anything, I wouldn’t feel the need to attack, because I’d be innocent.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975849591177441280

  • In other words you just don’t like what I said but have nothing intelligent to s

    In other words you just don’t like what I said but have nothing intelligent to say? Do you know what solipsism, neuroticism, and psychosis, mean? Look into gender differences in brain structure and the big five’s corresponding ten factors. You can get endocrine therapy for it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 21:43:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975850297691136001

    Reply addressees: @MikeMischnick @lucy_castille @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975848900727918594


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MikeMischnick

    @curtdoolittle @lucy_castille @realDonaldTrump Your first two sentences, even if true (which is dubious) are irrellvent, so I’ll ignore them like any sane person would. Your next sentence is only logical if you excise “in his strategy and tactics which is why they worked.” Your last sentence is delusional stupid.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975848900727918594

  • My answer to Why are some very smart people so quiet?

    My answer to Why are some very smart people so quiet? https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-very-smart-people-so-quiet/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=b38e0456


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 15:58:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975763546020737029

  • “Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”– Because conscientiousness a

    —“Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”–

    Because conscientiousness and ambition are equally important legs on the step stool to accomplishment.

    It is not actually enjoyable being exceptionally smart after grade school. Exercising that intelligence in the marketplace (world) produces competition that results in interpersonal frictions.

    The joy in life is largely the result of cooperation with others in the absence of stress.

    Smart people have many options for working with others in the absence of stress and enjoying life’s journey.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 13:55:00 UTC

  • “Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”– Because conscientiousness a

    —“Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”– Because conscientiousness and ambition are equally important legs on the step stool to accomplishment. It is not actually enjoyable being exceptionally smart after grade school. Exercising that intelligence in the marketplace (world) produces competition that results in interpersonal frictions. The joy in life is largely the result of cooperation with others in the absence of stress. Smart people have many options for working with others in the absence of stress and enjoying life’s journey.
  • “Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”– Because conscientiousness a

    —“Why do so many high IQ people amount to nothing?”– Because conscientiousness and ambition are equally important legs on the step stool to accomplishment. It is not actually enjoyable being exceptionally smart after grade school. Exercising that intelligence in the marketplace (world) produces competition that results in interpersonal frictions. The joy in life is largely the result of cooperation with others in the absence of stress. Smart people have many options for working with others in the absence of stress and enjoying life’s journey.