Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • SHEEP AND SHEPHERDS —“Most of us are naturally sheep. Some of us are capable o

    SHEEP AND SHEPHERDS

    —“Most of us are naturally sheep. Some of us are capable of accepting such a reality. The comparison of humans to sheep is as old as written history, or older. It wasn’t always an insult. It was once the mark of a good and connected ruler to be called a shepherd. The archetype of shepherd and father/patriarch was synonymous.”— Anne Summers

    —“The sheep/shepherd model describes a minority upper class ruling a majority underclass with virtually no middle class. in fact, the abundance of a middle class disrupts the stability of this model and naturally, the upper class would prefer to eliminate this instability.”—- George Hobbs

    (Pastoralism vs Agrarianism and Domestication)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 09:41:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/35686957_10156437469472264_2711089262538784768_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/35686957_10156437469472264_2711089262538784768_n_10156437469467264.jpg Curt DoolittleFig. 1. Electron micrograph of dysgenic entropy in formerly H. Sapiens Sapiens. – Simon StrömJun 19, 2018 9:01amGeorge Hobbswaiting for the shepherds to justify thisJun 19, 2018 9:05amKelly WilsonHow symbolic the term flock is. To be sheared fattened and butchered. For the benefit of the shepherdJun 19, 2018 9:09amAnne SummersMost of us are naturally sheep. Some of us are capable of accepting such a reality. The comparison of humans to sheep is as old as written history, or older. It wasn’t always an insult. It was once the mark of a good and connected ruler to be called a shepard. The archetype of shepard and father/patriarch was synonymous.Jun 19, 2018 9:21amCurt DoolittleHence the need for good rule.Jun 19, 2018 9:40amGeorge Hobbsthe sheep/shepherd model describes a minority upper class ruling a majority underclass with virtually no middle class. in fact, the abundance of a middle class disrupts the stability of this model and naturally, the upper class would prefer to eliminate this instabilityJun 19, 2018 9:42amRichard JacobsonThis says alot about are societyJun 19, 2018 11:01amVik LiA meme?!Jun 20, 2018 9:36pm

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35686957_10156437469472264_27110892

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/35686957_10156437469472264_2711089262538784768_n_10156437469467264.jpg Curt DoolittleFig. 1. Electron micrograph of dysgenic entropy in formerly H. Sapiens Sapiens. – Simon StrömJun 19, 2018 9:01amGeorge Perceval Oswaldwaiting for the shepherds to justify thisJun 19, 2018 9:05amKelly WilsonHow symbolic the term flock is. To be sheared fattened and butchered. For the benefit of the shepherdJun 19, 2018 9:09amAnne SummersMost of us are naturally sheep. Some of us are capable of accepting such a reality. The comparison of humans to sheep is as old as written history, or older. It wasn’t always an insult. It was once the mark of a good and connected ruler to be called a shepard. The archetype of shepard and father/patriarch was synonymous.Jun 19, 2018 9:21amCurt DoolittleHence the need for good rule.Jun 19, 2018 9:40amGeorge Perceval Oswaldthe sheep/shepherd model describes a minority upper class ruling a majority underclass with virtually no middle class. in fact, the abundance of a middle class disrupts the stability of this model and naturally, the upper class would prefer to eliminate this instabilityJun 19, 2018 9:42amRichard JacobsonThis says alot about are societyJun 19, 2018 11:01amVik LiA meme?!Jun 20, 2018 9:36pm

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 09:00:00 UTC

  • “It’s almost like we *are* animals, with an extra hunting tool known as the pref

    —“It’s almost like we *are* animals, with an extra hunting tool known as the prefrontal cortex”— Tyler Scott

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 08:07:00 UTC

  • THE QUALITY OF PARENTING IS DETERMINED BY VALUES —“I don’t think there is any

    THE QUALITY OF PARENTING IS DETERMINED BY VALUES

    —“I don’t think there is any non-material advantage that high-IQ brings to raising children. The advantages to IQ are all endogenous. Working-class folks with excellent values are going to out-parent upper-middle class couples who are non-present and ‘compensate’ via indulgence. The quality of parenting is determined by values.”— Aaron Kahland

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-19 07:13:00 UTC

  • The Benefit of The Cognitive Load of “enough” Family

    by Collin Turney I worked door-to-door selling educational books for families that helped from learning ABC’s to SAT college prep. I met a total of aprx 3000 families, and here is my analysis: 1 kid – highly stressed parents and child as a by product of the psychological stress that comes with the “all the eggs in one basket” mentality. This means strict grade requirements, strict curfews and other things that are small but total up to a large amount of stress on the child because he feels like it is his duty to never fail at anything. 2 kids: assuming tbe kids are close in age, aprx 8 years or less, creates a “versus” mentality in the family. One child is always against the other. This often will pit parents against each other as well as the kids are always trying to earn the favor of whichever parent likes them more. The younger child has a high propensity to be a polar opposite of their older sibling as they are so often compared to their older sibling and feel as if they are living in someone’s shadow and will become different out of spite to build their own identity. 3 kids: Nearing the breaking point. Not many negatives other than the youngest often can get away with murder and the middle one feels he has no identity as he is neither the oldest nor youngest. 4+ children: the parents at this stage are fully occupied with raising the kids and stop giving a crap about their own personal problems and just do what needs to be done to keep everyone fed. Also, they will just let kids be kids and not worry so much about if they are wrestling in the house or coloring on the walls or other petty things because the parents reach a point where they realize if they care to much about each individual thing the kids are doing they would go insane in less than a week. Also, at 4 or more kids the dynamic in the kids is such that the older kids often assume a part in raising the younger ones and everyone is held to the same standard rather than the “vs” mentality of the 2 kids family and the “baby, directionless middle child, and oldest most mature child” mentality of the 3 kids family. The chillest family I met had 8 kids under the age of 10 and the kids were in the middle of what seemed to be the toddler version of MMA in their front yard and the parents gave no hecks.

  • The Benefit of The Cognitive Load of “enough” Family

    by Collin Turney I worked door-to-door selling educational books for families that helped from learning ABC’s to SAT college prep. I met a total of aprx 3000 families, and here is my analysis: 1 kid – highly stressed parents and child as a by product of the psychological stress that comes with the “all the eggs in one basket” mentality. This means strict grade requirements, strict curfews and other things that are small but total up to a large amount of stress on the child because he feels like it is his duty to never fail at anything. 2 kids: assuming tbe kids are close in age, aprx 8 years or less, creates a “versus” mentality in the family. One child is always against the other. This often will pit parents against each other as well as the kids are always trying to earn the favor of whichever parent likes them more. The younger child has a high propensity to be a polar opposite of their older sibling as they are so often compared to their older sibling and feel as if they are living in someone’s shadow and will become different out of spite to build their own identity. 3 kids: Nearing the breaking point. Not many negatives other than the youngest often can get away with murder and the middle one feels he has no identity as he is neither the oldest nor youngest. 4+ children: the parents at this stage are fully occupied with raising the kids and stop giving a crap about their own personal problems and just do what needs to be done to keep everyone fed. Also, they will just let kids be kids and not worry so much about if they are wrestling in the house or coloring on the walls or other petty things because the parents reach a point where they realize if they care to much about each individual thing the kids are doing they would go insane in less than a week. Also, at 4 or more kids the dynamic in the kids is such that the older kids often assume a part in raising the younger ones and everyone is held to the same standard rather than the “vs” mentality of the 2 kids family and the “baby, directionless middle child, and oldest most mature child” mentality of the 3 kids family. The chillest family I met had 8 kids under the age of 10 and the kids were in the middle of what seemed to be the toddler version of MMA in their front yard and the parents gave no hecks.

  • Restoring the Market for Parental Roles

    Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human. Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition. Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe. We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.

  • Restoring the Market for Parental Roles

    Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human. Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition. Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe. We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.

  • RESTORING THE MARKET FOR PARENTAL ROLES Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Ca

    RESTORING THE MARKET FOR PARENTAL ROLES

    Parenting (Training, Risk Taking) and Care-taking (Maintenance, Risk Reduction) are very different things. As in all things the competition (market) between via-positiva and via-negativa produces optimums. Why? Anything else would require evolution not err, and frequently fail to adapt. We are not ants. We are special because of how rapidly we adapt. As such it is this market competition that creates a healthy human.

    Ergo, we education to produce an optimum (failure point, fragility point) because of female influence in education, whereas producing competitions (stresses, adaptions, anti-fragility) produces humans because of male competition.

    Women have destroyed civilization because they have undue influence in children, education (religion), and government. Pandora was a catastrophe.

    We have to restore competition (differences) between the genders, not seek equality.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-18 10:12:00 UTC