Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Retweeted Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf):
“Marital duration has a negative effect on married menâs physical pleasure of marital sex, and it has no effect on married womenâs sexual satisfaction.”
https://t.co/QN69LicwF6 My feature: The Coolidge effect – When sex goes stale through repetition
https://t.co/CUSBG7jT16 https://t.co/fGRTb3OhCm
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:10:46 UTC
As far as I know, men evolved demand for novelty for good reason. Women evolved sensitivity to ‘the whole experience’ for good reasons. Marriages that last more than the duration of a child’s maturity(max 7) are not driven by sex but discounts on socialization and cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:10:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018135660559990784
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017755279222550528
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
“Marital duration has a negative effect on married men’s physical pleasure of marital sex, and it has no effect on married women’s sexual satisfaction.”
https://t.co/QN69LicwF6 My feature: The Coolidge effect – When sex goes stale through repetition
https://t.co/CUSBG7jT16 https://t.co/fGRTb3OhCm
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017755279222550528
Retweeted Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf):
Intelligence has no systematic influence on the political vote, as it causes opposite effects on social and economic views, which cancel each other out. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 https://t.co/5S7hBl3Kj3
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:04:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018134262686670848
RT @DegenRolf: Intelligence has no systematic influence on the political vote, as it causes opposite effects on social and economic views,…
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:04:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018134218474426368
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Retweeted Rolf Degen (@DegenRolf):
Intelligence has no systematic influence on the political vote, as it causes opposite effects on social and economic views, which cancel each other out. https://t.co/l387v28mrl https://t.co/pWWvqhOQdh
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:04:48 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Conservatives are more likely to use an adultery site than liberals, and libertarians much more likely than Conservatives. Why?
Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)
Liberals are always on the market, and the price is cheap. Conservatives are on the market and the price is expensive, and libertarians are on the market and price is most expensive.
(via Skye Stewart, via Rolf Degen)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:02:59 UTC
Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:00:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018133113086541825
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017403089890902016
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
Conservatives were more likely than liberals to use an adultery dating website,, while libertarians took the cake. https://t.co/ucfzPjF3Eh https://t.co/R0cZm5BMxa
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017403089890902016
THE SCARY FUTURE OF 2100AD
125 = Group Optimum at anticipated technology.
112-115 = Group Optimum at current technology.
106 = Group Minimum Median.
95 = Global Minimum Median
83 = Zero – whether group or global.
*DYSGENIA*
You can only fix this through ‘reduction’ of the underclass.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 13:25:03 UTC
FULFILLING YOUR NEEDS
The reason you want a narrative and an ideology is so that you can feel in a group and in control in a world where you have none. But the only control you have is over your understanding of that world and your interpretation of that world. So narratives are inhibitors not enablers.
Propertarianism (Natural Law) will absolutely positively provide you with a consistent, correspondent, and coherent science, grammar, and logic with which to understand describe and interact with the world.
Stoicism (Self authoring in goals and virtues) will absolutely positively provide you with the mindfulness to control your interpretation of that world.
Restoration of our historical civilization to sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, and markets in all aspects of life will allow us to achieve our individual interests within the limits of available knowledge and resources, as well as defend ourselves from primitive competitors, and if necessary conquer and govern them, and if left no other choice, to eliminate them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 12:02:00 UTC
WINNING THE WORLD: DO IT.
What wins in this world. Simple.
1. Internal locus of control.
2. Individual sovereignty (I own me).
3. High Agency.
4. Intolerance.
5. A refusal to seek validation.
6. A refusal to seek approval.
7. The ability to think out to 2nd and 3rd order effects.
8. The ability to understand Requisite Variety — the one with the most options wins. As soon as you are limited by your own values, beliefs and morals against an enemy that wields dual-moralism or is polymorphic and peddles lies, you lose. The church offers confessions for a reason, win and then confess. There is no value in losing or dying with “honor”.
9. The understanding that you were dead the day you were born. And you have a duty and role to play.
10. Do it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:48:00 UTC