Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • MALES REQUIRE DOMINANCE PLAY (GAMES) TO INVEST IN LEARNING Let me help you. Male

    MALES REQUIRE DOMINANCE PLAY (GAMES) TO INVEST IN LEARNING

    Let me help you. Males learn via dominance play (competition). I teach the ‘male way’ through providing vehicles for dominance play by means of articulate argument. I stomp on other means of dominance play as unconstructive in this venue. But if you taught boys through dominance play they would be interested in education. The reason boys check out of society is that they have to resort to video games for their dominance play. Anything that can be taught in a video game will work.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 09:44:00 UTC

  • How Do We Evolve (genetically) and Why?

    (groups and genetics) 1 – We can evolve (a) through normal mutation (b) through selection by intergenerational expression (c) class (quality) sortition, rates of reproduction, and rotation, (d) through selection by group strategy and reorganization resulting in asymmetric rates, , (e) through technological innovation. Although “d” is misunderstood. 2 – Of these five methods of evolution it appears c,d,e are faster and more influential than a,b. And that in general we are selecting between low dimorphism and increased rates of maturity (male) in hotter climates, higher populations, and greater disease gradients, versus higher dimorphism and decrease rates of maturity (female) in cooler climates, lower populations, and weaker disease gradients. 3 – The primary axis of difference between the races and sub races, if not tribes, consists in (a) the distribution of dimorphism (balance of male and female traits between the genders), (b) degree of neoteny (balance of rates of maturity or delayed maturity), and (c) success at culling the underclasses (defectives). 4 – We do not face this reality yet in the postwar era due to (((suppression))) of scientific truths, but some races and sub races are more evolved than others and we can test this because rates of maturity (neoteny), degrees of dimorphism (cognitive structure, and endocrine responses), and IQ distribution (degree of suppression of the underclasses). In this sense races and sub races are vastly unequal. 5 – But this only means that in large part some groups express different excellences in their middle, upper middle and upper classes, and that some groups have been more successful at culling the lower classes due to climate and available means of production. 6 – In other words, we can continue to speciate by our various group excellences if and only if homogenous nation states that practice economic eugenics (reproductive limitations).

  • How Do We Evolve (genetically) and Why?

    (groups and genetics) 1 – We can evolve (a) through normal mutation (b) through selection by intergenerational expression (c) class (quality) sortition, rates of reproduction, and rotation, (d) through selection by group strategy and reorganization resulting in asymmetric rates, , (e) through technological innovation. Although “d” is misunderstood. 2 – Of these five methods of evolution it appears c,d,e are faster and more influential than a,b. And that in general we are selecting between low dimorphism and increased rates of maturity (male) in hotter climates, higher populations, and greater disease gradients, versus higher dimorphism and decrease rates of maturity (female) in cooler climates, lower populations, and weaker disease gradients. 3 – The primary axis of difference between the races and sub races, if not tribes, consists in (a) the distribution of dimorphism (balance of male and female traits between the genders), (b) degree of neoteny (balance of rates of maturity or delayed maturity), and (c) success at culling the underclasses (defectives). 4 – We do not face this reality yet in the postwar era due to (((suppression))) of scientific truths, but some races and sub races are more evolved than others and we can test this because rates of maturity (neoteny), degrees of dimorphism (cognitive structure, and endocrine responses), and IQ distribution (degree of suppression of the underclasses). In this sense races and sub races are vastly unequal. 5 – But this only means that in large part some groups express different excellences in their middle, upper middle and upper classes, and that some groups have been more successful at culling the lower classes due to climate and available means of production. 6 – In other words, we can continue to speciate by our various group excellences if and only if homogenous nation states that practice economic eugenics (reproductive limitations).

  • Religiosity and Computational Discounting

    (the economics of spirituality) I think where I stand today, is that I have almost fully converted to where i see the computational needs of the brain and the need to acquire certain resources (of all kinds), as causing emotional responses and wants. So when I study world religions it’s this computational savings I look for, and I try to understand what computational discount they’re ‘buying’ with it and what their ‘paying for it’ with external consequences of a large number of people doing so. So I don’t any longer hold (believe) that we are trying to serve emotions, but that emotions inform us as to the demands of our computational necessities. And so this allows me to extract my intuitions from the process of religions, because those religions were developed to ‘fool’ those intuitions by cheap means of training. So just as using propertarian language has helped me disassemble social science, and acquisitionism has helped me disassemble psychology, computational demands have helped me disassemble what we call spirituality. The ceremony of religion is just satisfying our need for computational discounts by running with the pack for a while, in some kind of ritual. The dogma of religion is discounting our reason. The homogeneity of religious provides discounting on cooperation. To some degree these computational efficiencies serve the same purpose as do money and prices: they create discounts from the production of commensurability, and incentive to pursue it.

  • Religiosity and Computational Discounting

    (the economics of spirituality) I think where I stand today, is that I have almost fully converted to where i see the computational needs of the brain and the need to acquire certain resources (of all kinds), as causing emotional responses and wants. So when I study world religions it’s this computational savings I look for, and I try to understand what computational discount they’re ‘buying’ with it and what their ‘paying for it’ with external consequences of a large number of people doing so. So I don’t any longer hold (believe) that we are trying to serve emotions, but that emotions inform us as to the demands of our computational necessities. And so this allows me to extract my intuitions from the process of religions, because those religions were developed to ‘fool’ those intuitions by cheap means of training. So just as using propertarian language has helped me disassemble social science, and acquisitionism has helped me disassemble psychology, computational demands have helped me disassemble what we call spirituality. The ceremony of religion is just satisfying our need for computational discounts by running with the pack for a while, in some kind of ritual. The dogma of religion is discounting our reason. The homogeneity of religious provides discounting on cooperation. To some degree these computational efficiencies serve the same purpose as do money and prices: they create discounts from the production of commensurability, and incentive to pursue it.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. TOURNAMENT SPECIES vs PAIR BONDING SPECIES by

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    TOURNAMENT SPECIES vs PAIR BONDING SPECIES
    by Candice Mary

    Human beings have been shown to use both of these strategies, and studying different cultures, tribes and societies reveals that some use either one or the other consistently and others use both within the society, others lean towards one way or to the other, depending on the socioeconomic strata of the individuals involved.

    TOURNAMENT SPECIES
    -Males have distinct and exaggerated physical characteristics that differ from Females
    -Males are larger than Females
    -Males highly aggressive and compete with one another for dominance
    -Females attracted to signs of health and strength. largest male in group, for protection.
    -higher testosterone,
    -males have decreased life span vs women
    -Males have numerous sexual partners
    -Females most often the only involved parent
    -male abandons females and offspring
    -very rarely produce twins
    -distribution of offspring focused on fewer males of the group, but highest reproductive rate per male.
    -Gene selection is via the dominant male combat first before mating then winner mates with ALL females

    PAIR BONDING SPECIES
    -male and female more equivalent in size
    (Think of animals that you cant tell gender vs the ones you can tell with a naked eye)
    -women attracted to mates who are more like themselves, than their opposites
    -females look for traits in males better suited for equal roles equal parenting unit
    -females delay mating, first expect to be “courted”, to assess potential mate to prove he is dedicated, consistent, and will be a provider for offspring. (Female Birds act helpless to see how a mate reacts, if he’ll hunt for and feed her worms like a baby. Testing paternal instincts)
    -less testosterone among males
    -Often females are a bit larger in size
    -twins much more common
    -equal distribution of males having offspring
    -females may get bored and sometimes abandon mate and offspring to find another partner to reproduce.
    (Women lose interest)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-28 21:17:00 UTC

  • Left Feminine vs Right Masculine Language Bias

    by John Mark Leftist/feminine language: “We (often assuming there exists a ‘we’ when in reality there is no unity) should do X.” Often there is no “because”, and if there is, it is “because feelings/emotion/short-term niceness/tolerance/pain relief.” The “because” virtually never includes a full accounting of costs. Right-wing/masculine language: “We (our unified group, or groups with a common incentive) must not do X even though not doing X places some limits on some people, because if we do X, bad things will happen (full accounting of costs).”

  • Left Feminine vs Right Masculine Language Bias

    by John Mark Leftist/feminine language: “We (often assuming there exists a ‘we’ when in reality there is no unity) should do X.” Often there is no “because”, and if there is, it is “because feelings/emotion/short-term niceness/tolerance/pain relief.” The “because” virtually never includes a full accounting of costs. Right-wing/masculine language: “We (our unified group, or groups with a common incentive) must not do X even though not doing X places some limits on some people, because if we do X, bad things will happen (full accounting of costs).”

  • Tournament Species vs Pair Bonding Species

    by Candice Mary Human beings have been shown to use both of these strategies, and studying different cultures, tribes and societies reveals that some use either one or the other consistently and others use both within the society, others lean towards one way or to the other, depending on the socioeconomic strata of the individuals involved. TOURNAMENT SPECIES -Males have distinct and exaggerated physical characteristics that differ from Females -Males are larger than Females -Males highly aggressive and compete with one another for dominance -Females attracted to signs of health and strength. largest male in group, for protection. -higher testosterone, -males have decreased life span vs women -Males have numerous sexual partners -Females most often the only involved parent -male abandons females and offspring -very rarely produce twins -distribution of offspring focused on fewer males of the group, but highest reproductive rate per male. -Gene selection is via the dominant male combat first before mating then winner mates with ALL females PAIR BONDING SPECIES -male and female more equivalent in size (Think of animals that you cant tell gender vs the ones you can tell with a naked eye) -women attracted to mates who are more like themselves, than their opposites -females look for traits in males better suited for equal roles equal parenting unit -females delay mating, first expect to be “courted”, to assess potential mate to prove he is dedicated, consistent, and will be a provider for offspring. (Female Birds act helpless to see how a mate reacts, if he’ll hunt for and feed her worms like a baby. Testing paternal instincts) -less testosterone among males -Often females are a bit larger in size -twins much more common -equal distribution of males having offspring -females may get bored and sometimes abandon mate and offspring to find another partner to reproduce. (Women lose interest)

  • Tournament Species vs Pair Bonding Species

    by Candice Mary Human beings have been shown to use both of these strategies, and studying different cultures, tribes and societies reveals that some use either one or the other consistently and others use both within the society, others lean towards one way or to the other, depending on the socioeconomic strata of the individuals involved. TOURNAMENT SPECIES -Males have distinct and exaggerated physical characteristics that differ from Females -Males are larger than Females -Males highly aggressive and compete with one another for dominance -Females attracted to signs of health and strength. largest male in group, for protection. -higher testosterone, -males have decreased life span vs women -Males have numerous sexual partners -Females most often the only involved parent -male abandons females and offspring -very rarely produce twins -distribution of offspring focused on fewer males of the group, but highest reproductive rate per male. -Gene selection is via the dominant male combat first before mating then winner mates with ALL females PAIR BONDING SPECIES -male and female more equivalent in size (Think of animals that you cant tell gender vs the ones you can tell with a naked eye) -women attracted to mates who are more like themselves, than their opposites -females look for traits in males better suited for equal roles equal parenting unit -females delay mating, first expect to be “courted”, to assess potential mate to prove he is dedicated, consistent, and will be a provider for offspring. (Female Birds act helpless to see how a mate reacts, if he’ll hunt for and feed her worms like a baby. Testing paternal instincts) -less testosterone among males -Often females are a bit larger in size -twins much more common -equal distribution of males having offspring -females may get bored and sometimes abandon mate and offspring to find another partner to reproduce. (Women lose interest)