Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law do

    As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law does demarcate those of us who are fully human from those of us who are still principally animal. We are not equal. Speech does not qualify one as human no matter how sophisticated the parrot.

  • As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law do

    As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law does demarcate those of us who are fully human from those of us who are still principally animal. We are not equal. Speech does not qualify one as human no matter how sophisticated the parrot.

  • —“Why Do Women Engage in Naxalt?”—

    —“Question – why do women hate generalizations more than men? Women far more inclined to say “yes but not all X are like that!”, where as men get the idea that trends exist, even if some individuals are outliers to this trend. Is it to do with the risk or social ostracism or one of these female power plays?”— Herd Instinct: Fear of being ostracized, ‘left behind’, or ‘left out of resource consumption’, or having her children face the same, because despite their children’s empirical value to the tribe,women want their children to have the best opportunities for social, economic, and reproductive success. Men think of the tribe (generalization) women think of themselves (solipsism) and their offspring (individualism). Female Herd “who will be harmed by this truth”, -vs- Male Pack “what opportunity can be seized by this truth” Hence why monogamy was a compromise that succeeded by dividing labor, and while no one had perfection each person had a ‘chance’ of benefiting from the division of labor between the genders. The question is, what behavior will men demonstrate now that women are at least marginally as capable in the workforce within the boundaries of the majority of jobs ‘in the middle’ (easy jobs), we are returning to serial marriage, or single motherhood (maternalism). Without invasion by more primitive groups, we would expect to see the return to maternal households in the majority of the underclasses, and save paternal households in the upper classes – as was the case throughout most of history. With the invasion of more primitive groups we should expect to see extermination of the less competitive single motherhood maternal family by the more competitive division of labor between male producers of income and female producers of the next generation. (which is what we are seeing.) To men, everything is a disribution (bell curve). To women everything is a flat line in the making.

  • —“Why Do Women Engage in Naxalt?”—

    —“Question – why do women hate generalizations more than men? Women far more inclined to say “yes but not all X are like that!”, where as men get the idea that trends exist, even if some individuals are outliers to this trend. Is it to do with the risk or social ostracism or one of these female power plays?”— Herd Instinct: Fear of being ostracized, ‘left behind’, or ‘left out of resource consumption’, or having her children face the same, because despite their children’s empirical value to the tribe,women want their children to have the best opportunities for social, economic, and reproductive success. Men think of the tribe (generalization) women think of themselves (solipsism) and their offspring (individualism). Female Herd “who will be harmed by this truth”, -vs- Male Pack “what opportunity can be seized by this truth” Hence why monogamy was a compromise that succeeded by dividing labor, and while no one had perfection each person had a ‘chance’ of benefiting from the division of labor between the genders. The question is, what behavior will men demonstrate now that women are at least marginally as capable in the workforce within the boundaries of the majority of jobs ‘in the middle’ (easy jobs), we are returning to serial marriage, or single motherhood (maternalism). Without invasion by more primitive groups, we would expect to see the return to maternal households in the majority of the underclasses, and save paternal households in the upper classes – as was the case throughout most of history. With the invasion of more primitive groups we should expect to see extermination of the less competitive single motherhood maternal family by the more competitive division of labor between male producers of income and female producers of the next generation. (which is what we are seeing.) To men, everything is a disribution (bell curve). To women everything is a flat line in the making.

  • —“Is saying that “women’s rights are human rights” a microaggression?”—

    Of course it is, for the simple reason that women’s psychological, social, reproductive, and economic interests are in competition with men’s psychological, social, reproductive, and economic interests; and that men’s interests advance the condition of women and children, while women’s interests undermine the compromise between men and women and destroy civilization (really) by uncontrolled hyper consumption, dysgenic reproduction, and political undermining by competing groups. Without women’s votes we would never have had a left leaning president, nor immigration on a scale that has created the conditions for civil war.

  • —“Is saying that “women’s rights are human rights” a microaggression?”—

    Of course it is, for the simple reason that women’s psychological, social, reproductive, and economic interests are in competition with men’s psychological, social, reproductive, and economic interests; and that men’s interests advance the condition of women and children, while women’s interests undermine the compromise between men and women and destroy civilization (really) by uncontrolled hyper consumption, dysgenic reproduction, and political undermining by competing groups. Without women’s votes we would never have had a left leaning president, nor immigration on a scale that has created the conditions for civil war.

  • ( I hate conflict. I hate gender conflict. I fk–ing hate race conflict. And mos

    ( I hate conflict. I hate gender conflict. I fk–ing hate race conflict. And most of all I hate religious conflict. Competition, particularly signal competition creates conflict. the only solutions are nation states or regression to the bottom. empires are self destructive. They give opportunity to the worst of everything. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 20:15:00 UTC

  • As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law do

    As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law does demarcate those of us who are fully human from those of us who are still principally animal. We are not equal. Speech does not qualify one as human no matter how sophisticated the parrot.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 16:51:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035570675778576385

  • As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law do

    As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law does demarcate those of us who are fully human from those of us who are still principally animal. We are not equal. Speech does not qualify one as human no matter how sophisticated the parrot.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 12:50:00 UTC

  • The fundamental problem is producing submission to the pack (piety) when the lea

    The fundamental problem is producing submission to the pack (piety) when the leadership of the pack is just as much of a bunch of bitchy whiny egoistic a–holes as you are. Hence idealistic third party proxies, OR monarchies. My preference is monarchies backed by judges and warriors. They’re not false. And they tend to subsidize the arts and letters.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 12:39:00 UTC