Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Conflict Between Different Races is Conflict Between Different Needs

    [S]tereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences, because they survive large scale observations over many years, by many people. People see other people with similar behaviors and say ‘these people act like this’. When many people make the same constant observation they develop into stereotypes. Stereotypes reflect the majority of people who they encounter with these behaviors. And all human populations under democracy vote heavily together, and whether under democracy or not, defend each other and rely upon one another, and favor one another, In marriage, friendships, neighborhoods, and workplaces style of dress manner of speech, body language, and a thousand other ways of signaling loyalty to the group. Groups stick together. They compete. They compete for status, wealth, access to political power. This is true everywhere in the world – except among the upper midd e and upper classes that have more in common with each other than they do with their lower classes – which is why it feels often t at our upper classes conspire against us – because they unintentionally do. The problem facing black people is not that blacks are somehow inferior. The problem is that a very large percentage of the black population is either (a) below the minimum employability, or (b) in the “evil 80’s”, where people resort to criminal and impulsive behavior. Fully 2/3 of the black population is in the high risk category of early sexual maturity, high testosterone aggression, high impulsivity, extremely costly education, low employability, high untrustworthiness, high risk of immorality, and high risk of criminality. Moreover, people remember immoral and criminal, and anti-social, and rude behavior many more times as intensely as they do kindness. And so the stereotype is created by the reality of the high number of people in ANY population wit large underclasses is *true’. White people have less of this problem because for thousands of years, they killed so many of their problem people by manorialism, cold, famine, war, and hanging a lot of them every single year europeans were all genetically middle class. A tactic which they practiced on black people in America as well. Domestication was a tactic that they had used on their own people for thousands of years. Criminals were hanged and had their throats slit, and were left to rot, and not buried. Asians did the same at even greater scale. Black people didn’t. The curse of warm climates lacking winters with hard freezes haunts people of color around the world today. he same reason they have dark skin is the same reason they have large underclasses. What is the lesson? There are only two solutions for black people. 1) separatism, so that they can use norms, eduction, laws, and institutions that suit the distribution of their population. Or, 2) stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children for four or five generations, and you will be equal to or superior to whites. OR, 3, do both. This is the source of Jewish excellence. They have been forcing their smartest to have extra children, and forcing their dumbest not to have any or to leave the community altogether. The primary difference between races, civilizations, and nations, is the degree to which the lower classes have been reduced in size relative to the middle and upper. And this problem will only get worse as we and technology evolve. Arabs are in worse condition than blacks. South American Indians in better condition. But this is not a problem of the color of one’s skin. It applies to all human groups of all sizes. Either stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children or pay the price of not stopping your ‘dumb’ people from having children. Because the time has passed when we will tolerate hanging your problem people in large numbers every year. We prefer to pay people not to reproduce.  

    41203490_291400808123483_7496041640440627200_o.jpg

  • Conflict Between Different Races is Conflict Between Different Needs

    [S]tereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences, because they survive large scale observations over many years, by many people. People see other people with similar behaviors and say ‘these people act like this’. When many people make the same constant observation they develop into stereotypes. Stereotypes reflect the majority of people who they encounter with these behaviors. And all human populations under democracy vote heavily together, and whether under democracy or not, defend each other and rely upon one another, and favor one another, In marriage, friendships, neighborhoods, and workplaces style of dress manner of speech, body language, and a thousand other ways of signaling loyalty to the group. Groups stick together. They compete. They compete for status, wealth, access to political power. This is true everywhere in the world – except among the upper midd e and upper classes that have more in common with each other than they do with their lower classes – which is why it feels often t at our upper classes conspire against us – because they unintentionally do. The problem facing black people is not that blacks are somehow inferior. The problem is that a very large percentage of the black population is either (a) below the minimum employability, or (b) in the “evil 80’s”, where people resort to criminal and impulsive behavior. Fully 2/3 of the black population is in the high risk category of early sexual maturity, high testosterone aggression, high impulsivity, extremely costly education, low employability, high untrustworthiness, high risk of immorality, and high risk of criminality. Moreover, people remember immoral and criminal, and anti-social, and rude behavior many more times as intensely as they do kindness. And so the stereotype is created by the reality of the high number of people in ANY population wit large underclasses is *true’. White people have less of this problem because for thousands of years, they killed so many of their problem people by manorialism, cold, famine, war, and hanging a lot of them every single year europeans were all genetically middle class. A tactic which they practiced on black people in America as well. Domestication was a tactic that they had used on their own people for thousands of years. Criminals were hanged and had their throats slit, and were left to rot, and not buried. Asians did the same at even greater scale. Black people didn’t. The curse of warm climates lacking winters with hard freezes haunts people of color around the world today. he same reason they have dark skin is the same reason they have large underclasses. What is the lesson? There are only two solutions for black people. 1) separatism, so that they can use norms, eduction, laws, and institutions that suit the distribution of their population. Or, 2) stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children for four or five generations, and you will be equal to or superior to whites. OR, 3, do both. This is the source of Jewish excellence. They have been forcing their smartest to have extra children, and forcing their dumbest not to have any or to leave the community altogether. The primary difference between races, civilizations, and nations, is the degree to which the lower classes have been reduced in size relative to the middle and upper. And this problem will only get worse as we and technology evolve. Arabs are in worse condition than blacks. South American Indians in better condition. But this is not a problem of the color of one’s skin. It applies to all human groups of all sizes. Either stop your ‘dumb’ people from having children or pay the price of not stopping your ‘dumb’ people from having children. Because the time has passed when we will tolerate hanging your problem people in large numbers every year. We prefer to pay people not to reproduce.  

    41203490_291400808123483_7496041640440627200_o.jpg

  • The Science On Racial Differences: We Are Very Different.

    Science on racial differences

              Some people in society have been under the false impression that the only differences between the human races is that of skin colour – a belief which is patently untrue. The races, or sub-species, of mankind have evolved over many thousands of years, and – as with sub-species of non-human species – they evolved in different ways, causing many differences: some physical, some mental, some readily apparent, and some not so obvious. Many Multiculturalists even deny that races themselves exist, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.[1] Scientists across the world have been discovering more and more differences between the races, and for the political orthodoxy of Multiculturalism to deny these differences is as ridiculous as the medieval religious orthodoxy denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

    (more…)

  • The Science On Racial Differences: We Are Very Different.

    Science on racial differences

              Some people in society have been under the false impression that the only differences between the human races is that of skin colour – a belief which is patently untrue. The races, or sub-species, of mankind have evolved over many thousands of years, and – as with sub-species of non-human species – they evolved in different ways, causing many differences: some physical, some mental, some readily apparent, and some not so obvious. Many Multiculturalists even deny that races themselves exist, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.[1] Scientists across the world have been discovering more and more differences between the races, and for the political orthodoxy of Multiculturalism to deny these differences is as ridiculous as the medieval religious orthodoxy denying that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

    (more…)

  • Crime: Science Answers the Question: Geography, Economy, Neoteny and Class Size.

    Black males are (extremely) disproportionately responsible for crime, which corresponds to black disproportionality of the lower IQ curve, and the black disproportionality of the faster rate of maturity curve, and black disproportionality of the testosterone curve, and black dominance of the reverse-neoteny curve. Blacks have shorter gestation periods. Blacks have lower metabolisms useful in heat, but lower industriousness as a consequence, when this factor alone will produce as great a difference in income potential as intelligence. Stereotypes are not only a necessity of temporal and cognitive efficiency, but they are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences because they must survive daily falsification (survival from competition). Because blacks mature earlier, and are more socially dependent for judgement and experience teen status pressure earlier and more deeply, they are disproportionately affected by awareness of lower social, sexual, economic, and political market value – when in proximity to other groups (Diversity is a ‘bad’). Despite the fact that (affect of deeper maturity) have higher self confidence at conflict with signal feedback. Worse, black males are disproportionately from single mother homes. And single mothers produce the majority of children with problems, particularly with children that mature early. So it is somewhat ‘torturous’ to mix black, muslim, and Hispanic with white, asian, and jewish populations, which creates conflict when what each group needs is homogeneity so that they can develop norms, laws, and institutions that suit their rates and depths of maturity and their vastly different class distributions. The worst crime whites have done was not slavery, which was endemic, it was to copy the soviets and force integration and deprive blacks of their emerging norms and institutions, but also their emerging middle, professional, and upper classes, who ‘defected’ due to the cost of carrying the vast black underclass and laboring class, that cannot compete outside of it’s own demographic. Africans evolved to survive heat, disease gradient, parasite gradient, many predators, many many human competitors. They have superior physical traits from bones, to sprinting to hearing, to skin. This is because neoteny is dangerous in their ancestral environment wich rewards rapid and deep maturity, and they were not able due to distance from trade routes, able to institute an agrarian empire sufficiently concentrated per square mile to cause upward reproduction of the upper classes due to continuous starvation of the underclasses. The lower latitudes produce greater ability to expand the upper classes (higher neoteny), and the higher latitudes produce greater abiity to sustain the lower classes (Less neoteny). Ethnocentrism is always superior for the simple reason that we can produce norms and institutions that suit our group’s distributions without competing for norms and institutions with others that require different norms and institutions. We use the examples of ashkenazim and sub saharan african as extremes at both ends of the spectrum. But the spectrum of success at shrinking the population below the minimum necessary for self training (105) is available to every group. The question is whether the elites in any group can force this reproductive change. Because by and large that seems very difficult with the development of rifles, that produced military equality offset only by numbers, and prohibited a professional military caste from domesticating the population through agrarian production.

  • Crime: Science Answers the Question: Geography, Economy, Neoteny and Class Size.

    Black males are (extremely) disproportionately responsible for crime, which corresponds to black disproportionality of the lower IQ curve, and the black disproportionality of the faster rate of maturity curve, and black disproportionality of the testosterone curve, and black dominance of the reverse-neoteny curve. Blacks have shorter gestation periods. Blacks have lower metabolisms useful in heat, but lower industriousness as a consequence, when this factor alone will produce as great a difference in income potential as intelligence. Stereotypes are not only a necessity of temporal and cognitive efficiency, but they are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences because they must survive daily falsification (survival from competition). Because blacks mature earlier, and are more socially dependent for judgement and experience teen status pressure earlier and more deeply, they are disproportionately affected by awareness of lower social, sexual, economic, and political market value – when in proximity to other groups (Diversity is a ‘bad’). Despite the fact that (affect of deeper maturity) have higher self confidence at conflict with signal feedback. Worse, black males are disproportionately from single mother homes. And single mothers produce the majority of children with problems, particularly with children that mature early. So it is somewhat ‘torturous’ to mix black, muslim, and Hispanic with white, asian, and jewish populations, which creates conflict when what each group needs is homogeneity so that they can develop norms, laws, and institutions that suit their rates and depths of maturity and their vastly different class distributions. The worst crime whites have done was not slavery, which was endemic, it was to copy the soviets and force integration and deprive blacks of their emerging norms and institutions, but also their emerging middle, professional, and upper classes, who ‘defected’ due to the cost of carrying the vast black underclass and laboring class, that cannot compete outside of it’s own demographic. Africans evolved to survive heat, disease gradient, parasite gradient, many predators, many many human competitors. They have superior physical traits from bones, to sprinting to hearing, to skin. This is because neoteny is dangerous in their ancestral environment wich rewards rapid and deep maturity, and they were not able due to distance from trade routes, able to institute an agrarian empire sufficiently concentrated per square mile to cause upward reproduction of the upper classes due to continuous starvation of the underclasses. The lower latitudes produce greater ability to expand the upper classes (higher neoteny), and the higher latitudes produce greater abiity to sustain the lower classes (Less neoteny). Ethnocentrism is always superior for the simple reason that we can produce norms and institutions that suit our group’s distributions without competing for norms and institutions with others that require different norms and institutions. We use the examples of ashkenazim and sub saharan african as extremes at both ends of the spectrum. But the spectrum of success at shrinking the population below the minimum necessary for self training (105) is available to every group. The question is whether the elites in any group can force this reproductive change. Because by and large that seems very difficult with the development of rifles, that produced military equality offset only by numbers, and prohibited a professional military caste from domesticating the population through agrarian production.

  • The Purpose of Social Hierarchies

    —-“The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allocate limited resources, such as mates and food (Sapolsky, 2005), facilitate social learning (Henrich & Mcelreath, 2003), and maximize individual motivation (Halevy et al, 2011; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). By definition, some individuals within the hierarchy – those at the top – will be afforded more resources and benefits than others, thus affecting morbidity and mortality. Despite that fact that there are always losers in this scenario, social hierarchies are highly pervasive across human cultures (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and they appear to emerge naturally in social groups (Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980; Chase, Tovey, Spangler-Martin, & Manfredonia, 2002; Gould, 2002; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Further, this group organization is not strictly a product of human cognition, as almost every group-living species demonstrates a natural tendency to organize into a social hierarchy (Sapolsky, 2004; 2005) where the higher-ranking members possess more power, influence, and advantages than the lower-ranking members (Fragale, Overbeck, & Neale, 2011; Mazur, 1985; Zitek & Tiedens, 2012).”—

  • The Purpose of Social Hierarchies

    —-“The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allocate limited resources, such as mates and food (Sapolsky, 2005), facilitate social learning (Henrich & Mcelreath, 2003), and maximize individual motivation (Halevy et al, 2011; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). By definition, some individuals within the hierarchy – those at the top – will be afforded more resources and benefits than others, thus affecting morbidity and mortality. Despite that fact that there are always losers in this scenario, social hierarchies are highly pervasive across human cultures (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and they appear to emerge naturally in social groups (Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980; Chase, Tovey, Spangler-Martin, & Manfredonia, 2002; Gould, 2002; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Further, this group organization is not strictly a product of human cognition, as almost every group-living species demonstrates a natural tendency to organize into a social hierarchy (Sapolsky, 2004; 2005) where the higher-ranking members possess more power, influence, and advantages than the lower-ranking members (Fragale, Overbeck, & Neale, 2011; Mazur, 1985; Zitek & Tiedens, 2012).”—

  • “The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allo

    —-“The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allocate limited resources, such as mates and food (Sapolsky, 2005), facilitate social learning (Henrich & Mcelreath, 2003), and maximize individual motivation (Halevy et al, 2011; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). By definition, some individuals within the hierarchy – those at the top – will be afforded more resources and benefits than others, thus affecting morbidity and mortality. Despite that fact that there are always losers in this scenario, social hierarchies are highly pervasive across human cultures (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and they appear to emerge naturally in social groups (Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980; Chase, Tovey, Spangler-Martin, & Manfredonia, 2002; Gould, 2002; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Further, this group organization is not strictly a product of human cognition, as almost every group-living species demonstrates a natural tendency to organize into a social hierarchy (Sapolsky, 2004; 2005) where the higher-ranking members possess more power, influence, and advantages than the lower-ranking members (Fragale, Overbeck, & Neale, 2011; Mazur, 1985; Zitek & Tiedens, 2012).”—

    ( h/t Bill Joslin )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 22:06:00 UTC

  • “No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via edu

    —“No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via education or instruction. A high IQ just makes it cheaper.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 18:09:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037764650094551041