Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • THERE IS NO REASON TO COMPLICATE THINGS; EMERGENCE IS COMPLICATED ENOUGH by @[11

    THERE IS NO REASON TO COMPLICATE THINGS; EMERGENCE IS COMPLICATED ENOUGH

    by @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes]

    Everybody knows Occam’s Razor; when you take that razor to human behavior and cut it in half, this is what emerges: Packs and Herds.

    Packs [masculine, thinking bias, eugenic (selects for specialty)]

    “Acceptance to a pack requires contribution; you’re good only for your value.”

    Herds [feminine, feeling bias, dysgenic (selects for conformity)]

    “Acceptance to a herd requires only blending in; you’re good only for camouflage.”

    No more NAXALT arguments; we all know, not all X are like that! But, you don’t get to boil-down a trend to a single data point and use that datum to disprove said trend; that’s called lying. This means stereotypes are accurate, as they with-stand the market of ideas, and behavioral evidence (data) to counter the stereotypical outcomes isn’t mounting.

    This shouldn’t upset anyone. Having a bare-bones (a skeleton) framework like this is incredible. The insights that can come from proper frameworks can’t be overstated.

    *h/t Curt Doolittle as there aren’t any others (that I know of AND I look, hard [link educators below if you have suggestions]) that produce as much intellectual output publicly; and I see no others fostering as much intelligent debate or facilitating as much actual learning as he. [Arguably Jordan Peterson, but Peterson has been slow to move his ideas forward; Maps of Meaning still being his under-rated masterwork and still being explained {This Pack/Herd split can be gleaned from that work as well as Erich Neumann’s:The Origins and History of Consciousness} but it’s not made explicit; the work meshes nicely together.]

    Curt has also closed holes in personality by concretizing the mapping onto brain structure/function: https://propertarianism.com/…/human-brain-regions-functions/

    “We ought not destroy competing packs to benefit the herds. Herds can’t respond efficiently to rapidly changing environments; what you get instead of problem solving is panic.

    Panic among animals shortens their time horizons (they make quicker decisions less thought through) for shorter term gains. This mistake accumulates until the day of reckoning comes about. The day all of your “not planning for the future” comes back to haunt you.

    Strong feelings are not the equivalent to being correct. There isn’t a feel good substitute for truth; no matter how much we’d like there to be!”

    I abhor virtue signaling; scoring cheap points offends my being; life isn’t a game (although easier if framed as such). The best version of everyone else makes a better world for ME! I am acting in my self-interest. I have been PM’d many times (warning of my offences) and blocked many more; this is good, I prefer to know where people stand; because many are standing on intellectual IEDs (emotional explosion is right under the surface). I intentionally use Facebook to incite (there’s an insight joke in there I’m sure). Invite ALL people to the table [humans do some of there deepest bonding over food {and information is meta-food}] and share with them.

    https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10103452526650821Updated Sep 27, 2018, 9:46 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 09:46:00 UTC

  • MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION) The Moral

    MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION)

    The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)

    SELF (ACTION) – ASCENDENT BIAS

    1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom

    OTHERS FEMALE BIAS – THE HERD

    2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating

    3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm

    COMMON – ESTABLISHED MALE BIAS – THE PACK

    4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal.

    5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion

    6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation.

    (M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 07:23:00 UTC

  • male pack reciprocity -vs- female herd proportionality

    male pack reciprocity
    -vs-
    female herd proportionality

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 05:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045188343443714049

  • male pack reciprocity -vs- female herd proportionality

    male pack reciprocity

    -vs-

    female herd proportionality

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 01:48:00 UTC

  • AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN C

    AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN COGNITIVE LOAD OF PERSONALITY TRAIT, NOT TRAIT DIFFERENCES.

    —“there are no differences between Blacks and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=297800657483498&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-26 17:27:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1045002038059380737

  • AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN C

    AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN COGNITIVE LOAD OF PERSONALITY TRAIT, NOT TRAIT DIFFERENCES, AND ERGO – SIZE OF UNDERCLASSES.

    —“there are no differences between Blacks and Whites on four of the seven personality constructs. Blacks are slightly more extroverted and emotionally stable, and Whites are slightly more agreeable. … (but) differences in the Big 5 are moderated by the cognitive loading of the personality scales.”— Tate and McDaniel [1]

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-26 13:27:00 UTC

  • MORE WE KNOW, THE MORE NATURE THE LESS NURTURE. Which is a good thing. Because .

    https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168/THE MORE WE KNOW, THE MORE NATURE THE LESS NURTURE.

    Which is a good thing. Because … well….

    Plomin is an authority. and the debate is over.Updated Sep 26, 2018, 3:32 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-26 03:32:00 UTC

  • It’s Time to Choose Our Future

    (FB BAN FOR 30 DAYS FOR THIS POST) The female of our species, or more correctly, the female mind in our species, is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism, and even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus; and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction that never ceases. This is the reason why women’s testimony has been discounted throughout history; why the cancer of abrahamism was spread through women; why women defected against their men and their civilization yet again, to feminism-postmodernism; and why there are continuous calls for “women must be heard”; and then, not surprisingly, counter-to-all-evidence that “women must be believed”. The female lacks the degree of male agency because she is more dependent upon the panic of herd than the hunting of the pack. It is rather obvious that once given the franchise under the presumption of agency, that women took out their anger on the church in europe, and on men in america. It’s rather obvious that as much as marxism was designed to appeal to and rally men at the bottom, that feminism and postmodernism were designed to appeal to and rally women as was christianity. It is rather obvious that women’s urge to nest and preen are more easily manipulated by advertising marketing and media. But Truth is Truth. The feminine mind lacks agency regardless of the sex of its bearer. And we cannot both preserve our civilization which is the originator of truth, reason, science, and all that comes from it by once again submitting to the herd of the female in this modern era as we did in the ancient. “Herd Panic”, and “herd consensus”, as well as the series solipsism, psychosis, and disapproval, shaming, ridicule, outburst, rallying gossiping and reputation destruction as a means of obscuring the truth due to lack of agency and fear of falling out of sync with the herd, must become part of our conscious vocabulary and argument such that we bring the distinction between lack of agency, falsehood and fear, versus agency, truth and reason. Lacking agency means you are not yet human and therefore not worthy of or capable of reciprocity any more than is a child – but require parenting. It is truth that in modernity we have greater prosperity and as such greater ability to absorb the damage of the feminine mind than in the past. But that reservoir is not limitless. That same prosperity however does leave us a choice: we can oppress one another, or we can revolt and separate, and develop feminine (failing) dysgenic orders and return to the animals and another dark age, or masculine competitive eugenic orders, that will continue our transcendence. It’s time to choose which of those consequences we will pursue.

  • It’s Time to Choose Our Future

    (FB BAN FOR 30 DAYS FOR THIS POST) The female of our species, or more correctly, the female mind in our species, is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism, and even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus; and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction that never ceases. This is the reason why women’s testimony has been discounted throughout history; why the cancer of abrahamism was spread through women; why women defected against their men and their civilization yet again, to feminism-postmodernism; and why there are continuous calls for “women must be heard”; and then, not surprisingly, counter-to-all-evidence that “women must be believed”. The female lacks the degree of male agency because she is more dependent upon the panic of herd than the hunting of the pack. It is rather obvious that once given the franchise under the presumption of agency, that women took out their anger on the church in europe, and on men in america. It’s rather obvious that as much as marxism was designed to appeal to and rally men at the bottom, that feminism and postmodernism were designed to appeal to and rally women as was christianity. It is rather obvious that women’s urge to nest and preen are more easily manipulated by advertising marketing and media. But Truth is Truth. The feminine mind lacks agency regardless of the sex of its bearer. And we cannot both preserve our civilization which is the originator of truth, reason, science, and all that comes from it by once again submitting to the herd of the female in this modern era as we did in the ancient. “Herd Panic”, and “herd consensus”, as well as the series solipsism, psychosis, and disapproval, shaming, ridicule, outburst, rallying gossiping and reputation destruction as a means of obscuring the truth due to lack of agency and fear of falling out of sync with the herd, must become part of our conscious vocabulary and argument such that we bring the distinction between lack of agency, falsehood and fear, versus agency, truth and reason. Lacking agency means you are not yet human and therefore not worthy of or capable of reciprocity any more than is a child – but require parenting. It is truth that in modernity we have greater prosperity and as such greater ability to absorb the damage of the feminine mind than in the past. But that reservoir is not limitless. That same prosperity however does leave us a choice: we can oppress one another, or we can revolt and separate, and develop feminine (failing) dysgenic orders and return to the animals and another dark age, or masculine competitive eugenic orders, that will continue our transcendence. It’s time to choose which of those consequences we will pursue.

  • They call it mindfulness, and we call it free will or agency. But it’s the same

    They call it mindfulness, and we call it free will or agency. But it’s the same thing: how much distance do you have from your impulses and intuitions such that you can reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 13:39:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1044582193987825664