Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • NPCBC, NPCNN, NPCR (h/t below)

    NPCBC, NPCNN, NPCR

    (h/t below)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 13:34:00 UTC

  • Just want to take a moment to point out that Overton Window of Fashion passed ‘T

    Just want to take a moment to point out that Overton Window of Fashion passed ‘The Sartorialist’ by last year. Men are becoming men again. it’s just SLOWLY happening.

    We we men. We’re slow that way.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 13:18:00 UTC

  • WE DON’T HAVE TO DEHUMANIZE SJWs ONLY EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE NPC’s. Um. They don’t

    WE DON’T HAVE TO DEHUMANIZE SJWs ONLY EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE NPC’s.

    Um. They don’t have to dehumanize SJWs. Because if Agency demarcates humans from animals, then they were never human in the first place and all this discourse is really fruitless because NPC’s (Those Lacking Agency) can’t in fact choose. Only follow instructions (scripts.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 12:55:00 UTC

  • HUMANS WRITE CODE, NPC’S RUN CODE #NPC It’s much easier for Neuro-Commoners to b

    HUMANS WRITE CODE, NPC’S RUN CODE

    #NPC It’s much easier for Neuro-Commoners to be infected by the NPC Virus. They have less if any agency, and are dependent upon one another for scripts they can run. Humans write code. NPC’s run code.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 12:53:00 UTC

  • NPC’s lack agency. That’s why they’re NPC’s

    NPC’s lack agency. That’s why they’re NPC’s.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 12:44:00 UTC

  • THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING —“lots of

    THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING

    —“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov

    Because you’re confusing what people intend. Instead it matters:

    1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception)

    2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises,

    3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce,

    4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    And;

    2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants.

    And;

    3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction).

    And;

    4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia.

    5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • NEW TERM COINED: “Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by inc

    NEW TERM COINED:
    “Neuro-Commoner.”

    This corrects the term “neurotypical”, by including it’s class position.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 22:31:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050876619798323200

  • “Neuro-Commoner”

    October 12th, 2018 6:31 PM

    NEW TERM COINED:“Neuro-Commoner.” This corrects the term “neurotypical“, by including it’s class position. 😉

  • Lean Mean Information Processing Machines

    October 12th, 2018 4:48 PM LEAN MEAN INFORMATION PROCESSING MACHINES

    —“Researchers discovered Aspergers individuals scores are much higher when they are evaluated by a test called Ravens Progressive Matrices, which encompasses reasoning, novel problem-solving abilities, and high-level abstraction. By comparison, scores for non-Aspergers individuals are much more consistent across different tests. Interestingly, Asperger participants performance on Ravens Matrices was associated with their strongest peaks of performance on the traditional Wechsler. A previous study by the same group found very similar results for autistic individuals as well, whose peaks of ability are perceptual, rather than verbal as in Asperger individuals. This observation suggests that individuals with autism spectrum disorders have a common information processing mechanism for different aspects of information (verbal vs. perceptual).”—

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025372 (h/t: @[100011784153824:2048:Drew Schibsted] )

  • IQ by Major (colleges Do Not Produce This Data on Purpose)

    October 12th, 2018 12:47 PM IQ BY MAJOR (COLLEGES DO NOT PRODUCE THIS DATA ON PURPOSE) [T]here are five different measures we use to answer this question: 1) the iq of high school students applying for university (we have their iq scores from standardized tests) 2) the sat scores of college students by major 3) the gre scores of grad students by major 4) the long term tracking of students from high school to life. 5) the lifetime performance of all degree holders by socio economic status. Most of these tests show volatility because 1) weschler is the best measure but only available in high school students, 2) mathematics appears to be the best functional test of intelligence at the high end, and ‘verbal ability’ was added to raise the measure of girls/women on tests, 3) the personality trait ‘industriousness’ is so influential on performance 4) sat scores test education, gre scores select upward, 5) colleges and universities vary vastly in the capability of students they attract and the difficulty of the major they provide. 6) smaller numbers of men go to college and tend to have higher abilities, and larger numbers of women go to college regardless of their abilities. 7) girls mature much earlier, and boys much later, so IQ stabilizes in adulthood (and any advances evaporate), and we have no means of IQ testing after 23 when this stabilization occurs other than lifetime performance. The numbers in the the OP reflect an effect which is well understood in the data: more women go to college than men by far now, and that lowers the score of women to the median because of regression to the mean at scale. Moreover, some degrees have a negative impact on lifetime earnings (social work, sociology, education). This is important for the simple reason that most published proxies for intelligence of gender and occupation use the number of degrees independent of major as a proxy for IQ which tends to vastly overstate or understand the biological intelligence, functional intelligence, of demographic areas. None of which is complicated. But the reminder needs to be out there constantly that this is how aggregates are produced.