Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • I think its that these religoins attract high disgust personalities

    I think its that these religoins attract high disgust personalities


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-26 18:32:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067123871311151106

    Reply addressees: @JoseNoway1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067113685745729536


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1067113685745729536

  • SIGNALS AND RELIGION by Luke Weinhagen Signals are like a drug. You get the dopa

    SIGNALS AND RELIGION

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Signals are like a drug. You get the dopamine hit from doing the signalling without having to expose yourself to the costs of doing the being.

    Signals are passive. Being is active. Your actions are always the expression of your truth .Where your passive state does not match your active state, your passive state is a lie. It is the exposure of this lie that people are responding to.

    It is the trappings of these belief systems that are, and should be, under attack first. The trapping are the passive decorations of belief, not the costly actions of belief. One can wear them and signal their belonging and righteousness. These are merely the demands the religion makes of its believers. Stripping this away is the first attack. There is no action here so there is no agency here. The response is all upset

    Once the trapping are stripped away you can know what the religion actually demands of its adherents. You learn what actions one must take as a practitioner, not just one that signals belief, but puts that belief into action. Where the attack on religion meets the practitioner is where agency begins to be available. It is at this point where practitioner of and critics of can meet with cooperation, boycott or violence. Where we have the opportunity to strip away those actions that impose an external cost and use the good that remains to help guide men to transcendence.

    Cooperation to remove the errors and lies and retain that which allows transcendence.

    Boycott to deny the external costs of errors and lies and allow the practitioners able to do so to keep their faith with full internal accounting. (Bill’s “Ending Brother Wars”)

    Violence to end the external costs of error and lies for practitioners unable to practice full accountability.

    (my guess is that when we get to a point where natural law is implemented, we will see cooperation, boycott and violence line up with Christianity, Judaism and Islam)

    In the exploration of religious belief, dogma and ideology I think Curt’s recent “No More Lies” post is one of his most important (even if you believe he got every single detail wrong) as it shows the effect of stripping away the trappings –

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156800621732264


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-26 11:46:00 UTC

  • CREATING THE HIGH-DISGUST PERSONALITY BIAS (pls discuss) by Anne Summers I would

    CREATING THE HIGH-DISGUST PERSONALITY BIAS

    (pls discuss)

    by Anne Summers

    I would argue 2 things… Abrahamic religions are attractive to, and create high disgust personalities. It’s the high disgust, low tolerance mind set that will “win the day”.

    (“The Most Intolerant Always Wins”)

    Abrahamic religions aren’t the problem, from looking at it from your point of view, it’s the high tolerance nature of the European.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-26 10:55:00 UTC

  • HOW IT FEELS TELLS US NOTHING. THE POISON TASTES GOOD TO THE RAT Meth, Heroin, C

    HOW IT FEELS TELLS US NOTHING. THE POISON TASTES GOOD TO THE RAT

    Meth, Heroin, Cocaine all feel good. Sugar feels good. Wheat feels good. Pornography feels good. The fake affections of prostitutes feel good. Comforting lies feel good. Hyperconsumption feels good. Virtue signaling feels good. Feeling good isn’t a test of anything other than the sensations we evolved as hunter gatherers. We have developed many means under agrarianism, pastoralism, civilization, industrialism, and the sciences, by which to achieve sensations that we could not obtain from the natural world except as subtle cues to scarcity. That something feels good (or bad) in the moment tells us very little about whether it is cumulatively good for us, for those around us, for our people, civilizations, and man. The opiates of the masses indeed do feel good. They are however extremely BAD for us. In fact, they are genocidal.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 13:27:00 UTC

  • It is extremely clear that among the masculine and feminine biases – in particul

    It is extremely clear that among the masculine and feminine biases – in particularly the need for community – favors the verbal, illusory, feminine, and conformist in some pools, and the actionable, existential masculine, and disruptive in others. Gender biases expressed at group levels at all scales. What is not clear is how absolutely rare the disruptive is – nor how – counter to intuitions – it’s the most important evolutionary trait for any civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 12:17:00 UTC

  • “The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which

    — “The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which has become the new religious orthodoxy and the new sins” — Dax Rayner

    (via Brandon Hayes)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 08:42:00 UTC

  • ( as a general rule, we need to stop the decline in the distribution – particula

    ( as a general rule, we need to stop the decline in the distribution – particularly since 95-97 produces a cliff – by redistribution of reproduction to the left of the spectrum and immigration of those same peers. We are not increasing productivity by importing low end consumers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 13:52:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065603919047467008

    Reply addressees: @johann_theron @ronellepretor @RobinEnochs @PrisonPlanet @AZRaider @MarkSKrikorian @GoodwinMJ @Janice4Brexit @michaeljohns @SecNielsen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065522974571339776


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johann_theron

    Via @curtdoolittle
    “If 20% people in your country don’t have IQ > 122, then your country will NEVER prosper.”

    (Don’t import low IQ or psychopathic peoples)

    @ronellepretor @robinenochs @PrisonPlanet @AZRaider @MarkSKrikorian @GoodwinMJ @Janice4Brexit @michaeljohns @SecNielsen

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065522974571339776

  • ( In interviews, it takes me a while to understand the other person’s ‘frame’, s

    ( In interviews, it takes me a while to understand the other person’s ‘frame’, so that I can match it without losing them. So when an interview or conversation starts, in the background, I’m trying to create a ‘plan’ of how to educate the other person. As I build up a bit of understanding, and build out that plan, I can intuit their frame and I can stop working so hard to self monitor my speech. So that’s when the conversation ‘gets going’. I mean, I have to create a chain of reasoning rather than oversimplify the ideas, since that’s a substantial part of the difference in my work. So I feel like I’m working pretty hard in these interviews because if I don’t then I almost always lose the interviewer and the audience. (And then Megan disciplines me for a few weeks…) I’m quite a bit different in person, or on stage because those problems are less challenging in those venues. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 07:38:00 UTC

  • The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to ident

    The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to identify. The bureaucratic mind is easy to identify. The house-spook or field-spook mind is easy to identify. The entrepreneurial mind is easy to identify. The working class mind is easy to identify. The labor mind is easy to identify. The (((tribal))) and female minds are easy to identify – on the use of frame alone, and the age and generation minds are easy to identify. The ease of identifying a class of mind is merely experience in doing so and reading the tells. You learn by LISTENING.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-20 07:21:00 UTC

  • WHY DOES ANYONE DO WHAT THEY DO? Why does anyone do what they do? Incentives. Yo

    WHY DOES ANYONE DO WHAT THEY DO?

    Why does anyone do what they do? Incentives. You can encourage someone to seize incentives they did not previously know of, but you cannot convince people NOT to seize opportunities and incentives that they DO know of. That’s why we invented disapproval, shaming, punishing, norms, laws, traditions and rules uncountable.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-19 09:17:00 UTC