Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • It’s just domestication syndrome

    It’s just domestication syndrome.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 03:54:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769573179058487465

    Reply addressees: @KirkegaardEmil

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769467287117889627

  • RT @JayMan471: For the record, while I suspect genotypic IQ in Haiti is maybe ab

    RT @JayMan471: For the record, while I suspect genotypic IQ in Haiti is maybe about 75 or so, Haiti is an argument for why the abysmally lo…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 03:53:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769572831765934501

  • RT @TheRabbitHole84: Racial groups rating each other

    RT @TheRabbitHole84: Racial groups rating each other

    RT @TheRabbitHole84: Racial groups rating each other: https://t.co/gOwbsM0Gua


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 03:31:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769567259909922921

  • SEX DIFFERENCES A substantial insight you can obtain from my work is the radical

    SEX DIFFERENCES
    A substantial insight you can obtain from my work is the radical divergence between the sexes in empathizing vs systematizing. The unambiguity:

    —“….gender differences in Big Five personality traits are ‘small’ to ‘moderate,’ with the largest differences occurring for agreeableness and neuroticism (respective ds = 0.40 and 0.34; women higher than men). In contrast, gender differences on the people(empathizing)–things(systematizing) dimension of interests are ‘very large’ (d = 1.18), with women more people-oriented and less thing-oriented than men. Gender differences in personality tend to be larger in gender-egalitarian societies than in gender-inegalitarian societies, a finding that contradicts social role theory but is consistent with evolutionary, attributional, and social comparison theories. In contrast, gender differences in interests appear to be consistent across cultures and over time, a finding that suggests possible biologic influences.”— Emil Kirkegaard


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 01:53:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769542660199497728

  • SEX DIFFERENCES A substantial insight you can obtain from my work is the radical

    SEX DIFFERENCES
    A substantial insight you can obtain from my work is the radical divergence between the sexes in empathizing vs systematizing.

    —“….gender differences in Big Five personality traits are ‘small’ to ‘moderate,’ with the largest differences occurring for agreeableness and neuroticism (respective ds = 0.40 and 0.34; women higher than men). In contrast, gender differences on the people(empathizing)–things(systematizing) dimension of interests are ‘very large’ (d = 1.18), with women more people-oriented and less thing-oriented than men. Gender differences in personality tend to be larger in gender-egalitarian societies than in gender-inegalitarian societies, a finding that contradicts social role theory but is consistent with evolutionary, attributional, and social comparison theories. In contrast, gender differences in interests appear to be consistent across cultures and over time, a finding that suggests possible biologic influences.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 01:53:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769542014012420096

  • Yes. 😉 (…”and put back shopping carts”… lol ) Also, extroversion and openne

    Yes. 😉 (…”and put back shopping carts”… lol )

    Also, extroversion and openness are approximate proxies for intelligence, and they have the highest heritability.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 00:06:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769515728363778079

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769512194608418849

  • The Big Lie Of Limited Genetic Differences Also: claiming that statistical diffe

    The Big Lie Of Limited Genetic Differences
    Also: claiming that statistical differences in genetic composition imply the equality of those differences is not only pseudoscientific but false and deceptive – because not all mutations, variations, and expressions produce equally selective effects.
    We know the direction of evolution favors neotenic selection (domestication syndrome) because of the extraordinary advantage of increases in cooperation by increases in agency (self regulation).
    The rest of the variations that persist are minor in comparison – usually local adaptation to food and disease sources.
    Neotenic evolution prolongs gestation, childhood (sexual maturity), and lifespan, producing increases in neural development (agency, self regulation) and adaptation (intelligence), as well cooperation by the suppression of impulsivity and aggression. The phenotypic expression that’s rather obvious is reduction of migration of stem cells from the neural tube retaining childhood features into adulthood.
    We don’t know how many changes have been necessary to produce domestication syndrome, but as we can can see from our domestication of animals, the behavioral and physical expressions are the same.
    It should not be terribly challenging to survey the most neotenous populations of the four major races (african, south eurasian, european, and east eurasian) and discover how many of those variations are encoded in the genome and how many are simply regulations of expression.
    The four races are separated by african -> south eurasian (1SD), south eurasian to european (1SD) -> European to east asian(½SD) with all other groups consisting of hybrids with almost perfect demonstration of equilibration between the gene pools.
    The four races, for this reason, differ in class sizes because class size roughly consists variation in intelligence and self regulation, and those variations expressed in capacity for scale of responsibility.
    The resulting differences in class sizes result in the visible differences in intelligence.
    And this is why group intelligence (measured by country, measured by ethnicity) is the single most important property of a population with the greatest determination of outcome of all properties of man whether genetic, developmental, cultural, institutional, or geographic.

    No more lies.
    Lies prevent us from the optimum polities with the optimum governments and the optimum policies: homogeneity produces a reduction of conflict.

    Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer @Glace15840573


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 20:41:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769464027132899328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769460311860424802

  • That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES d

    That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES differs between the races. This absolutely positively unquestionably true. And trying to personalize the truth as an attack on Musk is just intellectually dishonest.
    And will stansil is the most absurd left wing propagandist.
    You interviewed young people who are on the extreme edge of leftist thought. And not those who have careers that specialize in differences.
    In fact even someone as dedicated to NOT advancing racism as Dr Reich, who runs the best genetic research firm in the world, has cautioned that we must come to terms with rather large differences in the genetic expression of racial groups.
    The largest differences are:
    (a) Evolutionary neoteny and it’s consequences
    (b) The impact of neotenic differences in evolution on our self regulation and intelligence.

    Every counter argument is a lie.
    Quite by accident, I specialize in sex and group differences in lying.
    As far as I know I’m the leading researcher in the world on this subject.
    And the author of the above video, and Will Stancil, and the marginal researcher from Harvard are all engaging in lying. Where lying means they are seeking to justify a falsehood and a prior rather than disambiguate and testify to the evidence as it exists.

    We solved IQ before 2000. We solved sex differences by 2012. We solve race differences by 2018. These differences are easily understood. Their cause is easily understood.

    One would need a superior theory in order to compete with the rather obvious data.

    We are very clear that the postwar pseudoscientific attempt to falsify darwinian evolution natural selection and group differences caused by geographic isolation and speciation and hybridization as humans spread across the continents has been as intentional a pseudoscientific pursuit as was marxist economics and postmodern literature.

    The game is up.

    We must learn to govern despite our differences rather than the pretenses that we have none.

    Reply addressees: @JoshLekach


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 18:32:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769431605532037122

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769378838675329510

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: @notkavi Blacks (e.g., Mississippi) have low suicide rates rel

    RT @Steve_Sailer: @notkavi Blacks (e.g., Mississippi) have low suicide rates relative to whites and American Indians. Catholic and Jewish w…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 11:10:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769320454882304184

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: @charlesmurray I think progressivism is more a complaint about

    RT @Steve_Sailer: @charlesmurray I think progressivism is more a complaint about sex than death — that some people are more sexually attra…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 11:09:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769320061511008634