“WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?”
(core)
—“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”–
The Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by undermining, poisoning the well, and reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, and solving for face or consent — Versus the Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” of approval or rejection vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.
Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We bear the shame ourselves. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it.
In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.
GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.
This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony.
Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.
Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.
Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.
Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.
Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.
Judaism to undermine, Christanity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and far west use the male, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.
The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 02:34:00 UTC