Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • PROP THOUGHT PROVIDES STOIC REWARDS (author gave me permission to share) (this i

    PROP THOUGHT PROVIDES STOIC REWARDS

    (author gave me permission to share)

    (this is not an uncommon observation)

    —“Hi Curt

    Can I share something with you..?

    I’m trying to formulate some thinking around the implications of P … particularly in how Operationalism etc may relate to “individual well being”.

    Background: I’m going through a difficult situation with child custody right now… A lot high stress exchanges, bad feelings, shaming, baiting by from ex wife, gossip in local community. (rrgsm)

    However, I’m also getting a great deal satisfaction learning to incorporate testimonials into daily life. And it’s helping these immediate circumstances.

    Seriously: Tell people to focus on ONE particular video “Propertarianism – Testimonialism: Epistemology”

    Now, just thinking through some observations: As I shift my thinking towards P’s Operationalism and Testimonial epistemology…I’m finding a correlative shift of experience in my emotional states.

    Quite strikingly so.

    And I’m now wondering if there must be some direct causality between adopting the conceptual frameworks of P

    and subsequent real time changes in neurochemical/cortical function. e.g. that using P in an daily capacity instantiates higher cortical activity and accelerates and reinforces optimum levels of cognitive performance. And I think it’s because modes of thinking with P causes adrenal “fight-flight” activity (and clouded judgement) to subside.

    Somehow the INTERNAL COHERENCY of P seems to be a significant factor. So, does the multi-dimensional coherency of the conceptual approach (P) have some direct resonant relationship towards cortical functioning?

    Has this angle been discussed anywhere? Do you think it is possible to describe the emergent neurochemical basis (that allows for clear thinking) but as a ramification for having adopted P (Operationalism and Testimonialism) in particular?

    Cheers!”—

    (Bill Joslin Explains)

    Endocrine stress: P derived conclusions allow the hypothalamus to calm after acquisition (no more effort to needed to support or uphold the conclusion) – a high stressed CORT driven endocrine aligns with floating conclusions which require constant effort to maintain.

    The RESULT being a stoic calm opposed to a stoic calm being the practice to achieve calmness: “Odin grants a hard heart”

    FWIW: King of the hill learning might actually be a biological imperative for learning P as it’s an Adrenal (i.e. not CORT) driven process.

    –Bill Joslin

    —

    ( Curt: P => Stoicism. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 17:41:00 UTC

  • By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences mor

    By: Bill Joslin

    Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses.

    Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy.

    Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years.

    Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family.

    (via Brandon Hayes)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 16:17:00 UTC

  • “How do you get women to leave the workforce? Reduce incentives for them to choo

    —“How do you get women to leave the workforce? Reduce incentives for them to choose a career over family? If so how would that work?”—John Smith

    CLARIFICATION

    It’s not important that women leave the work force so much as that we lower the burden of not being in the work force so that women work for luxuries, socialization, and joy rather than out of economic necessity at the expense of family.

    There are women who will always feel the drive for achievement just like men do. There are plenty of women however, who would prefer to maintain a comfortable middle class lifestyle, while raising their children without compromise.

    HOW:

    1. Distribute liquidity (money supply) directly to consumers, instead of thru the financial system.

    2. Eliminate Consumer Interest on durable goods.

    3. Restore voluntary disassociation, so it’s not necessary to ‘buy a home where good schools are’ rather than have good schools by prohibiting peoples who ruin them. We can make most neighborhoods good neighborhoods again -without much difficulty.

    4. Eliminate subsidy for non-degrees in non-subjects.

    5. Eliminate communal property, alimony, and child support.

    6. Tax Freedom for self-support of 4 or more children.

    7. Involuntary Sterilization of dependent mothers.

    8. Restore universal male service, and continual fitness for service through age 60.

    9. Reduce junior and high school to half time and part time work thereby eliminating jobs for immigrants.

    10. This ends the ignorance, desocialization, and lack of agency an of teenagers such that they do not enter maturity with pent up sexual, social, economic, frustrations.

    We subsidize bad behavior. end the subsidies and the behavior will end.

    —“Those solutions lighten the burden of raising a nuclear family and help people avoid debt pitfalls. So that definitely helps women choose not to prioritize work over family. However, there is social status and wealth you can get from choosing a career over family. Women, like all humans, like wealth and social status. What’s stopping a female from becoming career oriented because she wants wealth and social status?.”–John Smith

    Women are not like men. They are much more signal driven. Change the signals and change the behavior. We will never turn back the clock. But we can rebalance the distribution.

    —“Very interesting Curt, thank you.”–John Smith

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 13:27:00 UTC

  • RADICAL CHANGE TO REVERSE RADICAL CHANGE The returns on low investment parenting

    RADICAL CHANGE TO REVERSE RADICAL CHANGE

    The returns on low investment parenting in exchange for additional income by women’s entry into the workforce, then absorbed by taxation and redistributed to the underclasses and immigrants has been catastrophic in addition to dysgenic. Instead, return to high investment parenting, high returns commons, and reduction in signaling costs between peoples capable of high trust order, with the resulting high returns is superior to the continuation of this suicide by finance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:33:00 UTC

  • NEXT STEP IN EVOLUTION IS HERE. WE MUST REORGANIZE TO EXPLOIT IT. THE NEXT STEP

    http://expand-your-consciousness.com/autistic-teenager-higher-iq-einstein-path-noble-prize/THE NEXT STEP IN EVOLUTION IS HERE. WE MUST REORGANIZE TO EXPLOIT IT. THE NEXT STEP IN HIGH INVESTMENT PARENTING.

    My view is that autistics (like me) are the next step in neoteny, and that this next step in our ‘evolution’ require an additional leap in high investment parenting, just like homo-sapiens required an additional leap in high investment parenting.

    RE: http://expand-your-consciousness.com/autistic-teenager-higher-iq-einstein-path-noble-prize/

    “LIfe Skills” are a female code word for “don’t leave us behind in evolutionary development”. The feminine mind fears leaving behind, the masculine mind fears not running ahead.

    Women demonstrably infantilize generations at every opportunity.

    Our next revolution in government is to undo the damage done by women’s infantilization of the polity, economy, and civilization, by eliminating the artificial construct we call childhood, and adding 15 years back to our productive development, and participation.

    My grandmother knit and sold mittens by the time she was four. Children were usually employed (particularly girls) by ages of five or six. Boys began their trades at seven. Boys commended ships at the age of twelve. Generals at the age of 14. We are graduating people from college with 100K in debt that don’t understand compound interest, basic economics, or the natural inequality of peoples – all because of the demands of women to ‘maintain influence and control’ – because they naturally lack the ability to do so by dominance in competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:07:00 UTC

  • In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re

    In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:32:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101475357025320966

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101019162305024000

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://t.co/Mb495FDRm4 https://t.co/xpUEQrZiDt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101019162305024000

  • It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neu

    It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 13:30:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101474751657230336

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101019162305024000

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://t.co/Mb495FDRm4 https://t.co/xpUEQrZiDt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101019162305024000

  • so·cial·ite [ˈsōSHəˌlīt] NOUN socialites (plural noun) —“a [female] person who

    so·cial·ite

    [ˈsōSHəˌlīt]

    NOUN

    socialites (plural noun)

    —“a [female] person who is well known in fashionable society and is fond of social activities and entertainment.”–

    (ie: A Seller)

    Synonyms

    —“a [male] person who is known as a ladies’ man, womanizer, philanderer, rake, roué, rich man about town, ladykiller”—

    ( ie: A Buyer)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_150357994

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53292243_10157020122247264_1503579947665457152_n_10157020122242264.jpg SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)Jaromír MiškovskýBag over head now Appstore iBag™.Mar 1, 2019, 10:09 AMEric Blankenburghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_a3oY1ND_8Mar 1, 2019, 11:11 AMSCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES

    (I’m only guilty once.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-01 09:12:00 UTC

  • Will to Submission for the female. Will to Power for the Male. You are welcome t

    Will to Submission for the female. Will to Power for the Male. You are welcome to submission. And you are welcome to the ancient world’s inversion of reality the same way that Postmodernists invert reality to destroy you. (And us.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 22:55:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101254539699720193

    Reply addressees: @AugustinianCoop @HHBenedictXVII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101240063541706752

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101240063541706752