(FB 1551450142 Timestamp) so·cial·ite [ËsÅSHÉËlÄ«t] NOUN socialites (plural noun) —“a [female] person who is well known in fashionable society and is fond of social activities and entertainment.”– (ie: A Seller) Synonyms —“a [male] person who is known as a ladies’ man, womanizer, philanderer, rake, roué, rich man about town, ladykiller”— ( ie: A Buyer)
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
(FB 1551449560 Timestamp) SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES (I’m only guilty once.)
(FB 1551449560 Timestamp) SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES (I’m only guilty once.)
-
(FB 1551449560 Timestamp) SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES (I’m only guilty once.)
(FB 1551449560 Timestamp) SCIENCE OF BEER GOGGLES (I’m only guilty once.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551447331 Timestamp) YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTROYED ITS CREDIBILITY â —“Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://osf.io/4ukq5 “— Rolf Degen It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics. In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551447331 Timestamp) YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTROYED ITS CREDIBILITY â —“Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://osf.io/4ukq5 “— Rolf Degen It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics. In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551397685 Timestamp) WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine. Yes, itâs evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women. Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance. Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior. While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it. Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much. Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551397685 Timestamp) WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine. Yes, itâs evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women. Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance. Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior. While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it. Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much. Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551561470 Timestamp) By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses. Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy. Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years. Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family. (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551561470 Timestamp) By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses. Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy. Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years. Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family. (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551551252 Timestamp) —“How do you get women to leave the workforce? Reduce incentives for them to choose a career over family? If so how would that work?”—John Smith CLARIFICATION It’s not important that women leave the work force so much as that we lower the burden of not being in the work force so that women work for luxuries, socialization, and joy rather than out of economic necessity at the expense of family. There are women who will always feel the drive for achievement just like men do. There are plenty of women however, who would prefer to maintain a comfortable middle class lifestyle, while raising their children without compromise. HOW: 1. Distribute liquidity (money supply) directly to consumers, instead of thru the financial system. 2. Eliminate Consumer Interest on durable goods. 3. Restore voluntary disassociation, so it’s not necessary to ‘buy a home where good schools are’ rather than have good schools by prohibiting peoples who ruin them. We can make most neighborhoods good neighborhoods again -without much difficulty. 4. Eliminate subsidy for non-degrees in non-subjects. 5. Eliminate communal property, alimony, and child support. 6. Tax Freedom for self-support of 4 or more children. 7. Involuntary Sterilization of dependent mothers. 8. Restore universal male service, and continual fitness for service through age 60. 9. Reduce junior and high school to half time and part time work thereby eliminating jobs for immigrants. 10. This ends the ignorance, desocialization, and lack of agency an of teenagers such that they do not enter maturity with pent up sexual, social, economic, frustrations. We subsidize bad behavior. end the subsidies and the behavior will end. —“Those solutions lighten the burden of raising a nuclear family and help people avoid debt pitfalls. So that definitely helps women choose not to prioritize work over family. However, there is social status and wealth you can get from choosing a career over family. Women, like all humans, like wealth and social status. What’s stopping a female from becoming career oriented because she wants wealth and social status?.”–John Smith Women are not like men. They are much more signal driven. Change the signals and change the behavior. We will never turn back the clock. But we can rebalance the distribution. —“Very interesting Curt, thank you.”–John Smith