(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550344302 Timestamp) —“Teaching women philosophy is like teaching boys abstinence.”—Nikolai Petroff (ouch. But there is a grain of truth in that) Did y’all see how oxford is dumbing down the classics degree because women can’t pass it? Damn. What is this world coming to.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550341174 Timestamp) KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky) Level 1. Preconventional Morality The earliest stage of moral development, obedience, and punishment is especially common in young children, but adults are also capable of expressing this type of reasoning. At this stage, Kohlberg says, children see rules as fixed and absolute. Obeying the rules is important because it is a means to avoid punishment. At the individualism and exchange stage of moral development, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinzâs needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests. Level 2. Conventional Morality Often referred to as the “good boy-good girl” orientation, the interpersonal relationships stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice,” and consideration of how choices influence relationships. This stage is focused on maintaining social order. At this stage of moral development, people begin to consider society as a whole when making judgments. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing oneâs duty and respecting authority. Level 3. Postconventional Morality The ideas of a social contract and individual rights cause people in the next stage to begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but members of the society should agree upon these standards. Kohlbergâs final level of moral reasoning is based on universal ethical principles and abstract reasoning. At this stage, people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550344302 Timestamp) —“Teaching women philosophy is like teaching boys abstinence.”—Nikolai Petroff (ouch. But there is a grain of truth in that) Did y’all see how oxford is dumbing down the classics degree because women can’t pass it? Damn. What is this world coming to.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550341174 Timestamp) KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky) Level 1. Preconventional Morality The earliest stage of moral development, obedience, and punishment is especially common in young children, but adults are also capable of expressing this type of reasoning. At this stage, Kohlberg says, children see rules as fixed and absolute. Obeying the rules is important because it is a means to avoid punishment. At the individualism and exchange stage of moral development, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinzâs needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests. Level 2. Conventional Morality Often referred to as the “good boy-good girl” orientation, the interpersonal relationships stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice,” and consideration of how choices influence relationships. This stage is focused on maintaining social order. At this stage of moral development, people begin to consider society as a whole when making judgments. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing oneâs duty and respecting authority. Level 3. Postconventional Morality The ideas of a social contract and individual rights cause people in the next stage to begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but members of the society should agree upon these standards. Kohlbergâs final level of moral reasoning is based on universal ethical principles and abstract reasoning. At this stage, people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420779 Timestamp) PATTERNS OF SPEECH Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet entirely empirical) like Michael comments and how other people (unsophisticated, without worldly experience, and entirely sentimental or anecdotal) comment. I ought to do a study of categories of comments just to show people how wise, smart, ignorant, and stupid people comment on a ignorant-wise, stupid-smart grid just to illustrate by pattern recognition what different people think like and act like. wise people ask. smart people tell ignorant people reject stupid people retaliate
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420779 Timestamp) PATTERNS OF SPEECH Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet entirely empirical) like Michael comments and how other people (unsophisticated, without worldly experience, and entirely sentimental or anecdotal) comment. I ought to do a study of categories of comments just to show people how wise, smart, ignorant, and stupid people comment on a ignorant-wise, stupid-smart grid just to illustrate by pattern recognition what different people think like and act like. wise people ask. smart people tell ignorant people reject stupid people retaliate
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550461054 Timestamp) THE SCIENCE OF RELIGIOSITY IN THREE POINTS Negative correlation between intelligence and religion. Greater negative correlation for dogma than behavior. In other words people demonstrate ethical behavior under the advice of the religion’s wisdom literature but ignore the dogma.
- First, intelligent people are less likely to (need to) conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma.
Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs.
Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
In other words, we cannot NOT have some sort of intuitionistic training of some form. Women are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of genetics. The lower classes are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of ability. “RELIGION” SOLVES THE NEURAL ECONOMY PROBLEM BY SOLVING THE MINDFULNESS PROBLEM.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550460291 Timestamp) You notice it’s been the cucks that cry about civil war and not the pagans. Test is successful. Purely indirect empirical evidence. There is no better evidence of the difference between those of us with the natural religion of our people worshiping our people, and the unnatural religion of others worshipping falsehoods.