(FB 1543761156 Timestamp) THESE STRATEGIES MAP TO THE THREE ROLES 1 – Ascendant-Male (Libertarian Productive), 2 – In-Demand-Male (Conservative), and; 3 – Female-and-Female-Allied-Male (Consumptive). Physics and Economics in Everything.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761156 Timestamp) THESE STRATEGIES MAP TO THE THREE ROLES 1 – Ascendant-Male (Libertarian Productive), 2 – In-Demand-Male (Conservative), and; 3 – Female-and-Female-Allied-Male (Consumptive). Physics and Economics in Everything.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761020 Timestamp) MORAL INTUITIONS MAP TO GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES OF ASCENDANT, DOMINANT, FEMALE-ALLIED, and FEMALE STRATEGIES We ride the elephant of our genes.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a photo.
(FB 1543761020 Timestamp) MORAL INTUITIONS MAP TO GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGIES OF ASCENDANT, DOMINANT, FEMALE-ALLIED, and FEMALE STRATEGIES We ride the elephant of our genes.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543674852 Timestamp) WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES? (important explanations) —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Å tÄpán Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness. So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction. And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens. Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex. The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity. Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.) Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency). I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543674852 Timestamp) WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES? (important explanations) —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Å tÄpán Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness. So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction. And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens. Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex. The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity. Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.) Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency). I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543850706 Timestamp) We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection – at an unrecoverable cost to your kin. They are not worthy of your doing otherwise. The most important choices in history are those that increase or decrease kin.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543781466 Timestamp) Statistically speaking, women are better with credit and safe-investing (conformity, obedience, and risk aversion), and men better with money, finance, and entrepreneurship (risk). As usual, women are better gatherers and men better hunters.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543850706 Timestamp) We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection – at an unrecoverable cost to your kin. They are not worthy of your doing otherwise. The most important choices in history are those that increase or decrease kin.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543768102 Timestamp) DISTANCE Distance from sentience (people who are in comas) Distance from consciousness (people who have no self or others) Distance from self (people who never disconnect from the self) Distance between another and self (people who ‘waken’ upon interaction with those whom they are close) Distance from another (people who mate closely, regardless of others ‘team’) Distance from kin group (People who mate closely, and form extended traditional family) Distance from circle (people who mate with circle of friends) Distance from others (people who live think feel entirely within the herd)