(FB 1542551183 Timestamp) REVERSING LOW RATES OF REPRODUCTION —“I would like to hear your opinion on that. What are your suggestions to reverse low fertility rate? How much are you concerned about this? Any idea on how to improve incentives for women to have more children?”—-Paulo Eduardo Marques If you reverse the disincentives to middle class reproduction and reverse the incentives for underclass reproduction and you reverse immigration, restore the family as the insurer as a unit of measure, and zone areas of economic opportunity for families then the problem will sort itself out.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542495373 Timestamp) —“You do not “choose a side” you pursue a genetic bias and continuously optimize.”—Micah Pezdirtz
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542559032 Timestamp) THE HIERARCHY OF LIMIT TESTS (SH-T TESTS) 1) children test the limits of mothers 2) women test the limits of men 3) men test the limits of other men 4) mankind tests the limits of nature.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542558043 Timestamp) IDEALS VS LIMITS by Bill Joslin The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to moral foundations asserted as universal and well… An ideal…. Opposed to the notion that all concepts exist with in limits (boundaries and context). By doing so, following a moral foundation which doesn’t acknowledge proper conditions which allows that action to exist has said action producing different and often opposite effects (ideal morals often result in immoral outcomes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557522 Timestamp) THE NATURAL ORDER by Bill Joslin Patriarchy is older than humans. Patriarchy evolves naturally because nature rewards ability and action (and nothing else). Patriarchy is driven by female sexual selection in all animals (including humans until the counter culture). Females with offspring produce demands (food, protection, shelter etc). Males provide supply (build shelters, provide protection, find food etc) and limits to consumption. Men are better equipped to secure communities (and nations) than women. Further to that men are expendable (do not produce children, can mate in seconds then die etc – where as women need gestation time and to raise children i.e. expensive) thus men are a better choice for dangerous work (protections, hunting, high-risk occupations). Women who chose men who are better able to provide and this increase their likelihood to survive. Those who choose differently will not thrive. Those men better disposed to these task will rise above others. This results in patriarchy. Patriarchy will always rise, if not explicitly it will be implicit (even the modern feminist manifestation only exists because of the support by a stack of powerful men ) When our laws take in consideration natural phenomena and also what undergirds these phenomena (survival strategies) then a proper patriarchy will be restored. A proper aristocracy will be restored. Islam won’t do this. Why? It’s a River Delta survival strategy adapted to a desert people (raider’s strategy). It scales up well, but crumbles under its own weight and tends to destroy human flourishing. Anglos got it right – velocity via natural law (judge discovered law), empiricism and shallow -via negativa- moral foundations (which results in velocity). This produces the best survival strategy Where this has failed has been universalism and idealistic moral foundations both of which are a result of Abrahamic rhetoric – the first middle eastern invasion of Europe .
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542551183 Timestamp) REVERSING LOW RATES OF REPRODUCTION —“I would like to hear your opinion on that. What are your suggestions to reverse low fertility rate? How much are you concerned about this? Any idea on how to improve incentives for women to have more children?”—-Paulo Eduardo Marques If you reverse the disincentives to middle class reproduction and reverse the incentives for underclass reproduction and you reverse immigration, restore the family as the insurer as a unit of measure, and zone areas of economic opportunity for families then the problem will sort itself out.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542495373 Timestamp) —“You do not “choose a side” you pursue a genetic bias and continuously optimize.”—Micah Pezdirtz
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542572175 Timestamp) —“Humans intuit and organize as packs and herds, mixed as together as one. Women intuitively construct a herd. Men intuitively construct a pack. Polygamy is the crudest solution of this competition between pack and herd –monogamy the ultimate balance of pack and herd. Monogamy (pairing off) is the optimum nash equilibrium possible – no individual has his or her optimum but together they have the optimum for all.”—Michael D. Abbott I’ll augment that a bit in that packs of men domesticated herds of females before they domesticated herds of other herd animals, and partnered with wolves(dogs), who are the other pack animals. The fact that women have always been property of males offset by the care of fathers and brothers for their daughters (once they understood such a thing) is antithetical to the modern mind, but it is the reason females still demonstrate herd instincts as prey and males still demonstrate pack instincts as predators, and why civil societies form marriages as the means of satisfying the demands of both.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542572175 Timestamp) —“Humans intuit and organize as packs and herds, mixed as together as one. Women intuitively construct a herd. Men intuitively construct a pack. Polygamy is the crudest solution of this competition between pack and herd –monogamy the ultimate balance of pack and herd. Monogamy (pairing off) is the optimum nash equilibrium possible – no individual has his or her optimum but together they have the optimum for all.”—Michael D. Abbott I’ll augment that a bit in that packs of men domesticated herds of females before they domesticated herds of other herd animals, and partnered with wolves(dogs), who are the other pack animals. The fact that women have always been property of males offset by the care of fathers and brothers for their daughters (once they understood such a thing) is antithetical to the modern mind, but it is the reason females still demonstrate herd instincts as prey and males still demonstrate pack instincts as predators, and why civil societies form marriages as the means of satisfying the demands of both.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542716470 Timestamp) The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to identify. The bureaucratic mind is easy to identify. The house-spook or field-spook mind is easy to identify. The entrepreneurial mind is easy to identify. The working class mind is easy to identify. The labor mind is easy to identify. The (((tribal))) and female minds are easy to identify – on the use of frame alone, and the age and generation minds are easy to identify. The ease of identifying a class of mind is merely experience in doing so and reading the tells. You learn by LISTENING.