Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Q: End Psychology and Continue with Cognitive Science, or Continue the Reformati

    Q: End Psychology and Continue with Cognitive Science, or Continue the Reformation of Psychology as Intended by Cognitive Scientists?

    In my understanding, the discipline of psychology, if it exist at all, consists of the discovery and documentation of cognitive abilities and biases that affect our behavior.
    Yes this is all biological, or more reductively, just physics at play.
    The cognitive scientists revolted against psychology precisely because it had no scientific basis. At present psychology is being reverse colonized by cognitive science. Though as you’re demonstrating, psychology being (a) the means of feminine manipulation and undermining (b) the contemporary equivalent of Astrology. So for the public and to end the public use of this pseudoscience, it might be better to just burn the discipline at the pseudoscientific stake, and just fully adopt the cognitive science framing.
    I’m not sure we shouldn’t reform the discipline so that it is free of freudian feminine bias and simply the science of cognitive biases and resulting behavior just as we treat biology as processes with deterministic ranges of output and resulting consequences to homeostasis and behavior.
    You might be right that we should abandon the term, and adopt a new one that is devoid of this feminine mental disease in the field. But I feel the more responsible and durable solution is to purge and reform the field so that it is free of the psuedoscience and fraud and manipulation that is endemic to the feminine mind, and the minds of those who produced that pseudoscience.
    I might be wrong.
    Happy to hear opinions.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @Meta_Trav


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 16:00:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776278832674177024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768288775384482281

  • PRIVILEGE IS JUST WHITENESS WHICH IS JUST TRUSTWORTHINESS WHICH IS JUST RESPONSI

    PRIVILEGE IS JUST WHITENESS WHICH IS JUST TRUSTWORTHINESS WHICH IS JUST RESPONSIBILITY
    It’s not privilege if you earned it. And white people earn it through practicing “whiteness”.

    What is “whiteness”? It’s adherence to and preservations of, and insurance of, the institutions… https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1770517795718975732


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:50:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776276140375580826

  • Most people in RL’s orbit should cluster around simiar scores. There are only ab

    Most people in RL’s orbit should cluster around simiar scores. There are only about four personality type clusters at macro scale. At the resolution of the OCEAN we see greater precision


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-04 23:03:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776022876069470321

    Reply addressees: @GhengisStark @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775996889160204598

  • I’ll happily answer any pseudoscience claims. After IQ, personality traits and f

    I’ll happily answer any pseudoscience claims. After IQ, personality traits and facets are the most accurate measure in psychology, and after that, stereotypes are the most accurate measure in Social Science. Even criticisms of MBTI are due to (a) the set of questions isn’t large enough (b) the resulting measures are only a bit different from Big5/6 Ocean. With some measures quite accurate (the corners) and others more variable. Big 5/6 facets are extraordinarily accurate, though my work (our work) has explained they are largely differences in before, during, and after information processing. And even then facets are measures of sex differences in evolutionary strategy, brain organization, and the resulting personality.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-04 23:02:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776022585760755712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775995108912955839

  • Its partly to do with bad teeth in the past. Smiling is a status symbol for thos

    Its partly to do with bad teeth in the past. Smiling is a status symbol for those with good teeth. (Really)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 20:31:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775622183986876801

    Reply addressees: @lerpclide40920

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775620469384982664

  • He’s a typical dark triad loser desperate for attention to sedate his life as a

    He’s a typical dark triad loser desperate for attention to sedate his life as a loser.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 18:25:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775590456572698739

    Reply addressees: @poodlebeenz @Clyatt__

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775578884236275849

  • WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININ

    WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININE
    GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Cognition:
    Feminine vs Masculine
    In Time vs Over Time
    Empathizing vs Systematizing
    Consuming vs Capitalizing
    Irresponsibility vs Responsibility
    Devotion vs Loyalty
    Small Scale vs Large Scale
    Herd vs Packs Global vs National
    Dysgenic vs Eugenic
    Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
    Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)

    AND GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Limits:
    Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
    –vs–
    Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.

    THEREFORE
    Males must take responsibility for imposing limits on feminine hyperconsumption and limit feminine consumption to capital production and responsibility for it: Reproduction and the production of responsible offspring capable of continuous evolution under a condition of prosperity.

    OTHERWISE
    The feminine will destroy the civilization from within by hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibility for continuing the western tradition of maximization of individual responsibility for private and common producing a continuously eugenic and evolutionary and prosperous society.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 17:28:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775576013117730816

  • I know y’all think it’s silly but i learn about the psychology of others when th

    I know y’all think it’s silly but i learn about the psychology of others when they attack me. They can’t comprehend that I”m immune to it, and it’s all just a research program for me.
    On facebook I used to start king of the hill games to run these experiments. But on Twitter I…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-02 02:21:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774985364169531404

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774984721975710066

  • (French culture is cognitively feminine)

    (French culture is cognitively feminine)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-02 02:06:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774981723819827450

    Reply addressees: @auny_marie @AndreAn97444856 @MinClaydough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774980276751315176

  • Again, all you are doing is repeatedly demonstrating the feminine technique of t

    Again, all you are doing is repeatedly demonstrating the feminine technique of trying to shame your betters into not leaving you behind.

    If you had any achievements in life. If you could conduct an adult and rational argument. If you had any point at all other than soothing your ego, then you would. But you dont, and it’s likely you can’t, because you lack the agency to exert such intellectual honesty over the influence of your animal instincts.

    I’ve built a series of hundred million dollar companies, bought them around the world, lived around the world, worked in justice and intel, retired early, and solved a series of the ‘hard problems’ in the history of thought. Then opened and institute and begun training others who are willing and able – most of which are extraordinary in their capacity to produce insight. I have demonstrated my competency in multiple fields. What have you done? Why do you have confidence in your instincts, intuitions, thoughts, and convictions? They appear childlike and trivial to me.

    Either you can comprehend my work and that of the others at the institute or you can’t. If you can’t that’s fine. If you can’t grasp why we use this particular vocabulary paradigm grammar and operational logic then that’s either another lack of ability or lack of effort or both.

    You seem to think you are special rather than one of the stream of stereotypical nitwits who are somewhere between failures, outcasts, or underachievers, desperate to find dominance expression in anonymous social media to satisfy your self image and status deficit.

    The staff regularly admonishes me for even paying you the tiniest bit of attention but I do find that about one percent of the time the individual has the capacity to overcome his intuitions or assumptions and then consider the possibility of learning.

    It’s just another science experiment for me.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @AndreAn97444856 @MinClaydough


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-02 00:38:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774959582168621056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774955085249871893