Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Men don’t have a higher risk of mental illness, women do – a lot higher. Men hav

    Men don’t have a higher risk of mental illness, women do – a lot higher. Men have a higher incidence of criminality. So anti-social behavior in men and women expressed differently. Women pretend to commit suicide for attention. Men don’t do it for attention, and succeed.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-28 01:08:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155283890052972544

    Reply addressees: @spacerxn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155283058532204544

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155283058532204544

  • COMPETITION, COMPETITION EVERYWHERE, AND NOT AN INDEX (MEASUREMENT) TO BE FOUND.

    COMPETITION, COMPETITION EVERYWHERE, AND NOT AN INDEX (MEASUREMENT) TO BE FOUND.

    You see, ‘you’ as in what you perceive as the self, are continually presented with competitions from which you (we) select winners. In the case of voluntary action, if you conceive of it, it’s already pre-processed and you simply ‘let the greyhound out of the box’ to act.

    In every human era we develop models. we are still working with the physical machine model of the brain, the electrical model of thought, the justificationary model in logic – but these are not how anything in nature or man operates. Instead, nature uses competition. And everything we do is not maintained against a MEASUREMENT but against COMPETING forces. This is one of the most important lessons I’m trying to teach you in the Course “Foundations”. There is no memory of things, but of the prediction of things. There is no plan of action, but competing plans of action. There is no BASELINE or prescription for a human being – other than survival and reproduction. Our thoughts are not linear but infinitely recursive with a slow forgetting curve that we perceive as ‘us’ (our conscious self), that is maintained as a continuous circuit in very evident and obvious areas of the brain.

    –“basal ganglia primarily in action selection – in helping to decide which of several possible behaviors to execute at any given time. In more specific terms, the basal ganglia’s primary function is likely to control and regulate activities of the motor and premotor cortical areas so that voluntary movements can be performed smoothly. Experimental studies show that the basal ganglia exert an inhibitory influence on a number of motor systems, and that a release of this inhibition permits a motor system to become active. The “behavior switching” that takes place within the basal ganglia is influenced by signals from many parts of the brain, including the prefrontal cortex, which plays a key role in executive functions.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 15:36:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508489372620332

  • “The biggest fault of current economists is not realizing the fact that human ca

    —“The biggest fault of current economists is not realizing the fact that human capital is basically tied to the genetic capital of a nation.”—Arby Hyde

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:37:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508257250186476

  • I believe in the evidence of distributions of differences in ability and consequ

    I believe in the evidence of distributions of differences in ability and consequent sexual, social, economic, intellectual and political market value demonstrate classes are genetic, hence low rotation; and that one should not provide false comfort to neurocommoners.

    Virtue signalling, and imposes costs upon the normative commons. I also believe commoners should not tempt the hubris of Dunning Kruger by speaking to their betters without concern for disciplinary response.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:36:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508252277783226

  • (…more) There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devo

    (…more)

    There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.

    The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.

    Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.

    I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.

    Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:30:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508228226103202

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508224120466758

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM (updated) I am, first, and foremost a follower of Natural Law. 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) A Pagan (Student and debtor to the heroes of history) 2) An Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), and 3) A Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. iv) faith in the success of having done so, for me and my people despite the risk and cost. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.: “The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.” (more….)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508224120466758

  • ” Curt, I’m going to propose a new definition of feminism, and you can tell me w

    —” Curt, I’m going to propose a new definition of feminism, and you can tell me what you think: Feminism is below replacement fertility rates. That’s it. It’s no more complex than that. If women are occupied with raising children, they won’t have time to destroy civilization.”—John Reeves

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:26:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508211993523988

  • CONSCIOUSNESS Working (thinking about) with this disambiguation: . Dead . . Brai

    CONSCIOUSNESS
    Working (thinking about) with this disambiguation:

    . Dead
    . . Brain Dead
    . . . Comatose
    . . . . “Unconscious” (this word is problematic)
    . . . . . Asleep, Sleeping
    . . . . . . Alert, Alertness (monitoring)
    . . . . . . . Aware, Awareness (sense-disambiguation)
    . . . . . . . . Conscious, Consciousness (valuation, judgement)
    . . . . . . . . . Executing (Executive function)
    . . . . . . . . . . Planning
    . . . . . . . . . . . Calculating
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Computing

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:25:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508207035570103

  • Men are physical super-predators, and Women are social super-predators. Hierarch

    Men are physical super-predators, and Women are social super-predators. Hierarchies in both.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:24:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508204838759228

  • YOUR FRAME IS UTILITARIAN AND CORRESPONDS TO YOUR DEGREE OF AGENCY, AND YOUR AGE

    YOUR FRAME IS UTILITARIAN AND CORRESPONDS TO YOUR DEGREE OF AGENCY, AND YOUR AGENCY YOUR DEMONSTRATED ABILITY

    Points of view don’t matter. Votes do. Money does. Budgets do. Demographic distribution does. “Our” folk are a for profit polity. Eliminate the others, eliminate political competition for power, restore the constitution and natural law so these things must be negotiated, and we’re all good.

    The right uses data. They just use HYPERBOLE to illustrate the kantian imperative of ‘what if a lot of people do this”? and that’s why they (we) use hyperbole. Because it changes the MORAL INTERPERSONAL CONTEXT into the POLITICAL CONTEXT.

    So I disagree.

    Empirical is empirical is empirical.
    Period.

    We frame our world by our agency. Those of us who have had power and responsibility and wealth think at political and economic scale. SImple people don’t.

    That’s why we have middle class philosophy and aristocratic class law, and lower class religion: differences in agency and different demands from our peers. simple, market, and political

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:22:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508195155044727

  • HOW CONSCIOUSNESS “RESTORES” Michio Kaku describes the stages of consciousness w

    HOW CONSCIOUSNESS “RESTORES”

    Michio Kaku describes the stages of consciousness which are close enough:
    … My body in space (space)
    … … Others in my near space (environment)
    … … … Future spaces (time)

    Unfortunately I have a lot of (painful) experience with the process of gradually restoring consciousness.

    The Monitor (yeah, that’s ‘you’ – with 1/10 second of memory.)
    … The Body (position, orientation, condition) 1/2 second mem.
    … … The Space (surrounding the body) (3 seconds of mem)
    … … … Others (in the space) (10 seconds of memory
    … … … … … The Context ( minutes of memory)
    … … … … … … And Past ( remembering ‘you’)
    … … … … … … … The Future ( ‘what now?’)
    … … … … … … … … Whatever was on your mind (what plans snd strategies have a I got going on).

    And this both of our descriptions are compatible, and also reflect the brain structure and organ responsibility

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508151040973459