Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • So those are the reasons marriage evolved. It’s the nash equilibrium where every

    So those are the reasons marriage evolved. It’s the nash equilibrium where everyone has the best possible for all even if no one has the optimum possible. Humans are naturally serially monogamous. It’s farming, property, eugenics that made long term monogamous marriage useful


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:13:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188549305247903747

    Reply addressees: @OfSalamis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188548985516113923


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @OfSalamis None of that really holds up given that in history 70% of women reproduced and 30% of men. So throughout history reproduction has been asymmetric.Marriage evolved to control conflcit, property and responsibility for offspring, thereby shielding the population from hazard of care.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188548985516113923


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @OfSalamis None of that really holds up given that in history 70% of women reproduced and 30% of men. So throughout history reproduction has been asymmetric.Marriage evolved to control conflcit, property and responsibility for offspring, thereby shielding the population from hazard of care.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188548985516113923

  • QUESTION ON POLYGAMY Because it just came up again, opinions on polygamy, for ea

    QUESTION ON POLYGAMY

    Because it just came up again, opinions on polygamy, for each:

    1. Scientific,
    2. Pragmatic
    3. Moral
    4. Traditional
    5. Christian

    Personally I think it’s like… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494070044523224&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 19:36:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188539979175215105

  • THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES Life separates plant from mineral. C

    THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES

    Life separates plant from mineral.
    Consciousness separates animals from plants.
    Agency separates man from animals.
    And not everyone has agency…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494039801192915&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:35:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188524685169958914

  • CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT DEMARCATE MAN FROM ANIMAL – AGENCY DOES —“We seem to ha

    CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT DEMARCATE MAN FROM ANIMAL – AGENCY DOES

    —“We seem to have this intuition that we are more than mere animals. What’s your take on this, Curt?”–Josh Gonzalez

    Can… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494030681193827&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:18:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188520254168809472

  • THE UTILITY AND DISUTILITY OF POLYGAMY by Martin Štěpán Polygamy works just fine

    THE UTILITY AND DISUTILITY OF POLYGAMY

    by Martin Štěpán

    Polygamy works just fine when the group’s strategy is to conquer other groups and take their women but in a society that is a closed system, there is a finite number of women and letting them naturally distribute in Pareto distribution will leave disenfranchised men with the only option of conquering men from their own society to have a chance at a woman of their own.

    The parallel zero-sum game to his I can think of is land. If all land in the nation’s territory was owned by the few leaving most men without realistic chance to own any by legal means, they will go to war.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 16:53:00 UTC

  • History is unkindly truthful. About 30% of women are undesirable and fit only fo

    History is unkindly truthful. About 30% of women are undesirable and fit only for labor. About 70% of men are undesirable and fit only for labor. What’s not obvious is that by the continuous production of eugenics in europe, we drastically reduced undesirable men and women, producing a majority genetic middle class, such that monogamy, the nuclear family, and property, were possible – even if some of us remained poor due to limited agrarian opportunity – making possible the colonial expansion using reserves of the genetic middle class. Y’all take this miracle of western civlization for granted. Now if we apply eugenics to the lower classes, filter out the intolerable, problematic, costly, and unproductive and keep pace with automation, and if we return to an emphasis on physical fitness, manners, and norms, we can hopefully restore the ‘desirability’ of enough men and women to restore demand for the family as the compromise between the genders. But if not we’re gonna return to the poverty of the rest of the world – a world that within one or two generations might just return to starvation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 16:26:00 UTC

  • QUESTION ON POLYGAMY Because it just came up again, opinions on polygamy, for ea

    QUESTION ON POLYGAMY

    Because it just came up again, opinions on polygamy, for each:

    1. Scientific,

    2. Pragmatic

    3. Moral

    4. Traditional

    5. Christian

    Personally I think it’s like prostitution: something you would not want for your own children, but is understandable for people who ‘otherwise fail’.

    Under P-Law it’s not marriage, but an exchange of powers of attorney, including for the internal sexual commons.

    I can’t think of it other than negatively.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 15:36:00 UTC

  • THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES Life separates plant from mineral. C

    THE CHOICE – AND OUR CIVILIZATION’S CHOICES

    Life separates plant from mineral.

    Consciousness separates animals from plants.

    Agency separates man from animals.

    And not everyone has agency.

    —Ryan Drummond

    Thus we have a choice.

    – Evolve the rest of man into agency (aryanism, africanism)

    – Cooperate at our current level of agency (hinduism)

    – Farm the rest of man that lacks agency (asianism)

    – Devolve man into the lack of agency (judaism and islam)

    —Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 14:35:00 UTC

  • CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT DEMARCATE MAN FROM ANIMAL – AGENCY DOES —“We seem to ha

    CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT DEMARCATE MAN FROM ANIMAL – AGENCY DOES

    —“We seem to have this intuition that we are more than mere animals. What’s your take on this, Curt?”–Josh Gonzalez

    Can you ask that a little more precisely?

    My point is that consciousness and agency are different things, and the point of demarcation between human and animal appears to be agency not consciousness.

    There are many humans that are still largely animal, and without domestic training are no better than any other farm animal. There are others that with very little training continuously develop agency.

    Western civlization is organized to recursively produce agency, in order to increase the numbers of the aristocratic noble, and middle classes (those with agency).

    Western civilization is not organized to preserve lack of agency – That’s judaism, christianity and islam. The failure of the jews to accomplish anything other than parasitism before conversion to aristotelianism, the christians to accomplish anything other than dark agees, and cathedrals that drained the economy, and the muslims the destruction of five great civilizations of the ancient world like cancer in human form.

    The Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese are right to insulate. The Europeans are right to domesticate. The europeans should also insulate. The africans have done nothing we can blame them for, except being outside of trade routes. THe persians may or may not be lost. The christians have converted christianity into a germanic folk religion(finally). The world faces only one remaining cancer, and that is abrahamism in jewish undermining, and islamic destruction. Otherwise Eurasian and African People are united in working for a better world for all.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 14:17:00 UTC

  • “I usually tell myself it’s cynical to think MOST women don’t reciprocate enough

    —“I usually tell myself it’s cynical to think MOST women don’t reciprocate enough – but it’s a common enough occurrence that it’s important to test such things before any commitments.

    One… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=493348134595415&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-26 18:55:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188167372877848583