Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

(DM: So I’ll translate both directions. (a) evolution provided such that the masculine and feminine divide the labor of sense perception. (b) neither is very good at the other’s division of labor. (c) throughout our history we have gadually had the upper classes (males) raise the middle then the lower, then the women, and now immigrants from less developed countries into our polities. (d) every time we do so the group ‘risen’ from their previous status agency and opportunity for consumption bring with them the bad habits (crimes) of their classes. Each Class seeks to maintain it’s rent seeking and irresponsibility while obtaining the benefits of new weath and opportunity – while NOT taking on that new responsibility necessary given their new agency. (e) the enlightenment and its wars were the result of the middle class ascent. the marxist catastrophe the result of the labor class ascent. (f) the present crisis the rsult of the female ascent. And the female ascent enabled the immigration and ascent of hostiles. (g) if women didn’t vote, work in govt, teach in education, or control the academy, or consume the products of advertisers, or consume the credit(debt) of the financial sector, none of what we currently experience would ave happened – men, and white men are simply outvoted by women and parasites. (h) Why? because the female instinct is responsibility for her children, and the socialization of responsibility of all else upon others and particularly men. In other words all female behavior is reducible to responsibility evasion. (i) as such yes, you are correct that we must restore male responsibilyt for private and common – in no small part because only men CAN be responsible for the common. But to do so requires political reformation so that women are no longer able to undermine the caapcity and will of men to maintain responsibiliyt, status, and sexual marketplace value necessary for family formation in the absence of that ability. (j) Our organization’s mission includes explaining the anti-social behavior of women outside of the family and friends; to equally suppress female antisocial behavior as we have the mail; to educate women and men in thir differences in antisocial behavior and how to compensate for them by regulating one another; andf finally to outlaw female antisocial behavior and to give women a house of government of their own, restoring a marketplace between the classes. Which is exactly what the monarchy, aristocracy(senate), industry(house), family(church) evolved into the modern state. (k) with the destruction of the church and the romanticist/ Nietzschean/Darwinian/Spencerian failure to restore European religion as European philosophy and aesthetics. And again, by the national socialist attempt to do so by force, (again, both undermined because the marxists destroyed it, and women facilitated it) we lost a ‘house of family’ as part of the state. And by granting women equal status in the market for political decisions instead of granting them a separate house, we’ve ensured they destroy us from within as they did trome with Christianity from within.
That is our understanding and our mission.
Womens’ intuitions and instincts do not scale, and are cancerous when they do. This does not mean in their domain of competency they are not as equally exceptional as men are in theirs.

Reply addressees: @radiofreenw