—“The flaw is male hierarchies are infinitely scalable. Female hierarchies are not scalable; they degenerate and collapse as their social control systems weaken in groups past dunbar’s number. Sucessful grandmothers would’ve held the balance of power in tribal life. This control was then passed to churches, allowing for larger populations to work together. Men are an army; women are a coven.”—Andrew M Gilmour
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 06:10:00 UTC
ALSO: Everyone’s Machiavellian on Twitter b/c short form not only favors undermining and promotion but it’s cheap and falsification expensive, w/ near impossibility of refutation, so rallying( approval/disapproval) dominates discourse not argument (truth/falsehood).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 18:43:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214618645038587905
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214581403582644224
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
“Our results confirmed that there does indeed appear to be something unique about people who use Twitter rather than just Facebook.” https://t.co/uu4hlyq1Bi https://t.co/IeGcP6VFCh
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214581403582644224
Short form favors rallying gossip and undermining for status. Long form favors the opposite. In either case twitter people have more free Time for self promotion than peers. As young urban low production childless info workers dominate twitter users.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 18:14:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214611257317302283
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214581403582644224
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
“Our results confirmed that there does indeed appear to be something unique about people who use Twitter rather than just Facebook.” https://t.co/uu4hlyq1Bi https://t.co/IeGcP6VFCh
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214581403582644224
HEIGHT AVERSION IS GENETIC
I love it that hight aversion is genetic. In the 90’s I had to take drugs to work on the 22nd floor, and even the 9th floor in Kiev was hard on me. I’m good thru about six. Otherwise it triggers the vertigo, and once it start’s is unmanageable. I can’t even watch videos, tv, or movies of heights. The vertigo sticks for up to three days. Worst episode was that dance club in Vegas at fifty something floors with a glass floor. I just lost my vision typing this by remembering it. I did fine until I broke my concentration. Once I did in like three seconds it was over. I had to keep my eyes closed and hug the wall all the way down. My sister can’t do bridges. They don’t bother me. Neither do planes. And I don’t have a problem on mountains, just buildings. It’s something about flatness – any time my brain can imagine the ground as a wall it’s over. I did this sales call once on the thirty-something’th floor of the Darth Vader building in Seattle. I sat in a chair and pressed my left foot down crossed legs, and pushed my right knee upward under the table for an anchor. The entire time the room was doing the whole carousel thing and I maintained composure. We got the deal. Really. The staff had no idea. Not until we got near the elevator and I couldn’t control it any longer. lol Truth is I think it was one of our few project failures. Company was in deeper trouble than they let on. They needed a contractor but wanted someone to take the liability. Doesn’t work that way. You want staff and cheap get a body shop. You want liability then you pay for it. That’s how tech works. But don’t ask for one and then try to morph it into the other. We did like 2500 projects a year last I recall. Always within 3%. Pretty much never failed. No matter what it takes. A good firm whether advertising, marketing, or tech, can only hold so many customers in the portfolio at any time and take ownership of success. Customer acquisition is like 250K. Much better to hold them. So if you gotta eat profit it’s totally worth it. But you gotta fire customers regularly if they don’t appreciate it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 15:49:00 UTC
Just pointing out that (((Undermining))) and conflict generation is the instinctive female strategy and that their (((Elites))) are the antithesis – mirror image – of western civilization’s Creation, Innovation, Cooperation by Markets, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Heroism, Truth.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:41:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214542695668101121
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214365242773397505
IN REPLY TO:
@StefanMolyneux
Seth Rich
Vegas Shooting
Jeffrey Epstein
9/11 + Saudis
Russia Collusion hallucination
Impeachment of Trump over Biden crimes
Awan brothers infiltration of Congress
Law has abandoned morality.
Law is now politics.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214365242773397505
DIFFERENCES IN STANDARDS
by Vengefül Bobmoran
High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of *appearance* of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone.
The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us.
They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 14:53:00 UTC
ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH DEBITS AND CREDITS (MEMORY)
—“Women crave privilege and license. Men desire liberty and justice. Prove me wrong.”—Joshua Fox
Turn that statement into economic language: women desire consumption and men desire opportunity for production – the consequence of which is trading sex and reproduction for resources: a division of labor organized by voluntary exchanges.
—“To the root!”–Joshua Fox
Human behavior is all physics. It has to be.
Economics is just physics with debts and credits.
Our consciousness is just a vehicle for negotiating terms of cooperation.
Cooperation is just a means of obtaining higher returns on investments of time and calories.
Marriage – especially universal marriage – is the optimum compromise and the optimum means of calculating reproduction.
The feminists are under the impression that men will behave by current means if the compromise of marriage and therefore exchange disappears. But if universal marriage and exchange of productivity for sex and offspring without imposing costs on others no longer exists, men will either invent new ways or revert to old ways that do not require cooperation.
Women choose individually.
Men choose collectively.
Marriage and family is the compromise.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 10:43:00 UTC
ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH DEBITS AND CREDITS (MEMORY)
—“Women crave privilege and license. Men desire liberty and justice. Prove me wrong.”—Joshua Fox
Turn that statement into economic language: women desire consumption and men desire opportunity for production – the consequence of which is trading sex and reproduction for resources: a division of labor organized by voluntary exchanges.
—“To the root!”–Joshua Fox
Human behavior is all physics. It has to be.
Economics is just physics with debts and credits.
Our consciousness is just a vehicle for negotiating terms of cooperation.
Cooperation is just a means of obtaining higher returns on investments of time and calories.
Marriage – especially universal marriage – is the optimum compromise and the optimum means of calculating reproduction.
The feminists are under the impression that men will behave by current means if the compromise of marriage and therefore exchange disappears. But if universal marriage and exchange of productivity for sex and offspring without imposing costs on others no longer exists, men will either invent new ways or revert to old ways that do not require cooperation.
Women choose individually.
Men choose collectively.
Marriage and family is the compromise.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 10:38:00 UTC
MALE AND FEMALE
We have the same reaction to insult and rejection, but it doesn’t interfere with our thinking. Conversely, once females hit puberty and their nervous systems evolve to encompass children (or others or abstractions in the absence of children) it affects women’s thinking. We divide the labor of everything, including the short term (women and the vulnerable) and the long term (men and the tribe).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 19:13:00 UTC
We do not dispute the obvious, only the intuitive. Men and women do not differ in task performance: the concrete – at least over time, but we differ in bias: the intuitionistic – at least in the immediate.
When all other knowledge, reason, and experience fails, we are left with intuition, and the female herd empathic-interpersonal consumptive dysgenic of numbers will compete with the male analytic-political pack productive eugenic of quality for the simple reason that these are our reproductive strategies.
Even as such, they are useful like most generalizations at scale, when we are discussing aggregates and biases, since men and women each contain a portfolio of traits and various masculine to feminine biases.
This axis (protecting children regardless of males who are in charge versus protecting assets including territory, resources, women, children from other men who would deprive us of them) is pervasive and when a bias is evident and it is counter-rational, it is this bias driving it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 18:36:00 UTC