Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

I didn’t say that trauma also can destroy normal development – just the opposite

I didn’t say that trauma also can destroy normal development – just the opposite. I wasn’t and am not trying to have that discussion. My purpose is to remove the presumption that is not a developmental problem, and as such it’s not a ‘choice’.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 17:09:08 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221117813865185280

Reply addressees: @GloriousMale @wait4itto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221111060196941826

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221111060196941826

January 25, 2020
Sorry boss. Data is data and I do data. So far the data points to birth defect c

Sorry boss. Data is data and I do data. So far the data points to birth defect caused in utero during early development, but is insufficient to cause the body to reject the fetus. We don’t know the cause as there are too many candidates. But the result is developmental failure.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 16:25:29 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221106828412686337

Reply addressees: @GloriousMale @wait4itto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221105995759439873

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221105995759439873

January 25, 2020
Well, you know that’s the conservative disgust response. I understand. On the ot

Well, you know that’s the conservative disgust response. I understand. On the other hand, if it’s a birth defect it doesn’t ‘spread’ so to speak. All we can do is limit public displays of anti-family, and sexual hedonism.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 16:15:12 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221104238291554305

Reply addressees: @GloriousMale @wait4itto

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221079825420640258

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221079825420640258

January 25, 2020
I think we can say the vulnerability runs in families. I think we can say it’s a

I think we can say the vulnerability runs in families. I think we can say it’s a developmental defect. It may be an externality to a genetic disposition, but I haven’t seen any evidence it’s genetically transmitted and if so wouldn’t account for increase in risk with each son. https://twitter.com/WALLABEEDON/status/1220957529196331008

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 12:28:37 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221047217076756480

https://twitter.com/WALLABEEDON/status/1220957529196331008

January 25, 2020
(No but that doesn’t mean that a mother’s immune system’s reaction to T, or some

(No but that doesn’t mean that a mother’s immune system’s reaction to T, or some other related response, doesn’t cause developmental failure – esp since % risk increases with each son.)

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 12:24:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221046274255880192

Reply addressees: @wait4itto @Nalo_Nei

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220961741099524096

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220961741099524096

January 25, 2020
THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT WAS A SHAM

THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT WAS A SHAM https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1220667371028975618

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 12:22:17 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221045623102889985

https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1220667371028975618

January 25, 2020
RT @DegenRolf: The originator of one of the most famous psychology experiments o

RT @DegenRolf: The originator of one of the most famous psychology experiments of all time fails to refute the claim that it was a sham. ht…

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 11:56:23 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221039106710560768

January 25, 2020
left handedness is, as far as I know due to under development in utero and early

left handedness is, as far as I know due to under development in utero and early birth. most of these issues are developmental failures.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 11:52:59 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221038249197625344

Reply addressees: @WALLABEEDON

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220957529196331008

IN REPLY TO:

@WALLABEEDON

@curtdoolittle Homosexuality can be genetic. Left-handedness has a 32% correlation, counterclockwise sworl pattern on crown of head has a 66% correlation. 93% of humans have a clockwise sworl. Of the 7% that do not, 66% are self-professed Gay/lesbian.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220957529196331008

January 25, 2020
This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the

This paper is accessible, from 2016, and summarizes the findings from across the decades. It’s rather obvious that “The fraternal-birth-order effect” is currently the most convincing cause, and its heritability, a most convincing vulnerability.

http://psi.sagepub.com/content/17/2/45.full.pdf

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 01:51:14 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220886816510873600

Reply addressees: @JayMan471

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@JayMan471 BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@JayMan471 BTW 2: So far in the two or three times you’ve disagreed with me it’s because you are rushing to judgement. I realize that the world is full of idiots you must defend your time and space against. But I’m not one of them. -hugs

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220881087024586752

January 25, 2020
Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testos

Agreed. That doesn’t nullify the (a) runs in families (b) second son, (c) testosterone and immune system theories. As for the viral is merely that I can’t falsify the hypothesis, so I’m not willing to take it off the shelf.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 00:52:02 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220871916350853121

Reply addressees: @JayMan471

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220856582881320965

IN REPLY TO:

@JayMan471

@curtdoolittle https://t.co/9dwH4INWnX

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220856582881320965

January 25, 2020