Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • keep proving my point. Feminine means of undermining by accusation without evide

    keep proving my point.
    Feminine means of undermining by accusation without evidence and feminine conflation of approval with truth.
    You’re embarrassingly obvious.
    It’s somewhere between humorous and depressing.
    It means you’re unreformable and you and those who behave as you do…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 17:14:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786444151178903734

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786441839941169249

  • “Otto Weininger’s famous book ‘Sex and Character’.”– Honestly, I just work with

    –“Otto Weininger’s famous book ‘Sex and Character’.”–

    Honestly, I just work with the science. I came to similar conclusions by my study of the female-jewish-abrahamic-marxist sequence of warfare (Sedition) and a study of sex differences in lying (linguistic analysis) and then cognition (neuroscience).

    But since then I tend to read philosophy and the history of group conflict (especially with the feminine jews) to understand (a) what went wrong, (b) why were are almost uniquely vulnerable to it (c) how to articulate it in law such that it is possible to outlaw.

    The fact that theologians, philosophers, historians, and scientists like myself come to roughly the same conclusion, with simple increases in precision due to the spectrum of precision of our cognitive paradigms, is perhaps the best evidence that the findings are correct.

    That said it’s a lot easier to understand Weininger (and many other authors) than it is the rather brutal scientific and operational proof in my work that they’re correct. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @KarlRadl @WalterIII


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 17:09:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786443024010027008

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786413225648472419

  • (staying on message) DYSGENIC FERTILITY AND DYSGENIC IMMIGRATION Average IQ scor

    (staying on message)
    DYSGENIC FERTILITY AND DYSGENIC IMMIGRATION
    Average IQ scores in the United States have been declining in recent decades. This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as the “Flynn effect in reverse” or “dysgenic fertility.”

    The study published in the journal…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 16:00:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786425608894923222

  • (staying on message) DYSGENIC FERTILITY AND DYSGENIC IMMIGRATION Average IQ scor

    (staying on message)
    DYSGENIC FERTILITY AND DYSGENIC IMMIGRATION
    Average IQ scores in the United States have been declining in recent decades. This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as the “Flynn effect in reverse” or “dysgenic fertility.”

    The study published in the journal “Intelligence” in 2018 by Michael Woodley of Menie and colleagues analyzed data from several large-scale IQ studies conducted in the United States over the past century.
    They found that average IQ scores had been increasing until around the 1960s, but have since declined slightly. The authors suggest that this decline could be due to a number of factors, including declining rates of cognitive ability in the population, and changes in the composition of the population.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 16:00:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786425608810983425

  • RT @NoahRevoy: In most marriages, the husband has a male cognitive bias and the

    RT @NoahRevoy: In most marriages, the husband has a male cognitive bias and the wife has a female bias.

    What does that mean?

    It means you…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 13:08:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786382427272655130

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @AutiStrike @ThruTheHayes -“If people act rationally accordin

    RT @curtdoolittle: @AutiStrike @ThruTheHayes -“If people act rationally according to sex, personality, intelligence, class, and culture, th…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-02 15:36:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786057220976693343

  • I have a sort of rule. Ridicule is unconstructive. It’s for women. Because that’

    I have a sort of rule. Ridicule is unconstructive. It’s for women. Because that’s all they’re capable of – disapproval. That’s why I dislike memes. For men, at least in matters of economics, politics, and geostrategy, can we just make adult arguments free of loading and framing,…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-01 22:07:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785793263489728701

    Reply addressees: @NydxkPols @wizardofemerald @alexandrosM

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785786481715659162

  • SEX DIFFERENCES DISCUSSIONS ARE SILLY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS This is silly. We keep

    SEX DIFFERENCES DISCUSSIONS ARE SILLY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS
    This is silly. We keep trying to frame sex differences in the context of economic productivity and political influence, instead of why the sexes evolved as the do. Women need to mature enough to reproduce quickly and to extend their nervous systems by hyper empathizing to account for the challenge of mentally observing, caring for, and regulating the minds, behavior, and development of thier offspring and to do so by the spectrum of ‘seductive’ care taking and emotional regulation.
    The males (who are unfortunately, more disposable, and replacable) have to instead, mentally track the condition of territory, resources, and assets that must be systematically understood because it’s partly beyond their perception. This is the opposite need of the female.
    So, women mature earleir and LESS than men, who mature later and more. But what does later and MORE mean? It means instead of empathizing with what’s in front of you IN-TIME, men systematize what’s NOT in front of the OVER-TIME. So the sex differences effectively result in a division of labor in time given sex roles. This plays out as women favor attention and consumption and externalization of resonsibility (for status) and men favor accumulation of capital and responsibility for it (for status) and status is just the measure of the discount on opportunities for cooperation, and cooperation is a discount on time, whether in-time(short term) or over-time(long term).
    Now, what I suppose my work has taught me, is that all human developmental behavior occurs because of minor – very minor – bias in biochemistry, neurological composition, and most importantly neurological organization (what connects to what and how much).
    So, it’s perhaps easier for me to understand and explain sex differences in development and maturity because I understand the (very simple) set of rules that cause sex differences and variation between us in addition to those sex differences.
    At present we’re writing this section of the book, but somehow I feel it’s not as good as my courseware becasue there in slides I can use graphics, illustrations, diagrams, and videos.
    But really, In my foundations and methods work, I try to list ‘dimensions’ which are the ‘levers’ that cause variation between us. And the variation between the sexes is just a few of those ‘levers or knobs’ and our vast diferences in behavior, especially at the extremes, are the product of just variation in those dimensions.
    It’s disturbingly simple.
    BUT it’s only disturbingly simple if you seek to know what is and why FIRST instead of justify what you want or wish it was.
    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @FeminaStudiosa @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-01 19:59:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785761000135741442

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785757633191834060

  • It means prolongation of development including neural development – or stated di

    It means prolongation of development including neural development – or stated differently, it means extending the duration of cognitive plasticity and therefore adaptation. IE this is why learning is harder after twenty six or so – for most people.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-01 19:40:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785756121107398859

    Reply addressees: @matteo_pilgrim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785731300197896596

  • We all perceive possibility given our perception of our own agency. In other wor

    We all perceive possibility given our perception of our own agency. In other words do not project your ability and judgement onto the ability and judgement of others, who, for various reasons, are more able to compromise with others, follow demonstrated leadership, bear costs and risks, and bear the burden of bringing about change.
    In other words, black pills are just an attempt to ‘guilt’ others when it is the speaker of the black pills that is guilty. 😉
    -Hugs

    Reply addressees: @Raudenbusch1 @alexandrosM


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-01 17:28:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785722917499678720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1785717426564260237