RT @curtdoolittle: Q: CURT: “WHAT DOES TOXIC FEMININITY CONSISTS OF?”
Toxic Femininity consists of the natural expression of female instin…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 17:57:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787179734822015010
RT @curtdoolittle: @WomanPissedoff Quite the opposite.
SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 17:56:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787179652940796153
RT @curtdoolittle: Q:”CURT: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FEMALE MIND?”
(in a word: ‘prey’. (fear))
1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is e…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 17:56:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787179622716645418
RT @Scientific_Bird: New study shows that, in Finland and Norway, the relationship between cognitive ability and income becomes *steeper* i…
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 02:28:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786946103515943356
Evidence of dysgenia…. https://twitter.com/gum__cuzzler/status/1786815627291726290
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 02:16:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786942931242262552
–“I’m not sure collectives are deep enough to know exactly why they feel a revulsion towards genius. But it does seem to be a constant thing.”–@SunshineSorrow1
Explanation:
It’s (a) forcing adaptation (a cost) (b) questioning their own certainty and agency (a cost) (c) producing insecurity and vulnerability (a cost) (d) provoking resistance to influence or persuasion they cannot comprehend – or at least, can’t without investment they’re unwilling or unable to make.
Reply addressees: @SunshineSorrow1
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 01:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786932913252020224
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786928178054742020
It’s easy to equate personality with religion and while there is a minor difference in susceptibility to superstition and religion, that’s all.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-04 21:06:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786865124705235322
Reply addressees: @KareMHaret
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786855875111501890
Difference for me is submission and evasion vs dominance and evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-04 19:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786843519895646403
Reply addressees: @rikstorey @FlashGorgone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786843295961817151
THE EVIDENCE OF THE EMERGING SHIFT IN HUMAN METAPHYSICS
What we are seeing is enough generations of experience with computers modifying the metaphysics of the human mind so that all fields whether computation, ai, genetics, biology, technology, language, and economics are all… https://twitter.com/stephen_wolfram/status/1786472715244785977
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-04 19:38:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786842855933182165
I see, so your argument is that incompatible group strategies, the internal class, and sex strategies, and the regional and class factional and generational strategies might be unified by a philosophical system that tolerated preservation of some of the supernatural, but that across peoples (ethnicities, civilizations) the demand for the frame of reference and its accessibility given the diversity of hte division of labor and classes means that religion will at some level need to convey the foundational narrative that maintains the group strategy? I mean, look at theology to atheism around the world and it’s almost a parallel for iq and development.
Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley @SRCHicks
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-03 20:04:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786487068585000960
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1786482372214497432