Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF SH-T TALKING AND SH-T TESTING TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides

    THE SOCIAL UTILITY OF SH-T TALKING AND SH-T TESTING

    TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides mindfulness. It provides safe competitive dominance play while showing respect at the same time. It requires self regulation. It requires cunning. It allows public accusation and admission of truths. It is desensitizing. It builds trust. I can’t say enough good about it. Whereas GSRRM does the opposite. The techniques of GSRRM and Sh-t_Testing as the via-negativa undermining vs Sh-t Talking and Bragging as the via-positiva advocating explain the social utility of each.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-03 09:18:00 UTC

  • RELATIONSHIP WISDOM Things I know how to do that seem to work. – Be funny. – Be

    RELATIONSHIP WISDOM

    Things I know how to do that seem to work.

    – Be funny.

    – Be affectionate.

    – Be supportive constantly

    – Listen when necessary

    – Be a gentleman when necessary.

    – Make her look good to her friends.

    – Be tasteful.

    – Make money.

    – Fix things.

    – Lift heavy things.

    – Be scary when necessary.

    – Make her coffee.

    – Rub her feet.

    – Wash her hair.

    – Feed her chocolate

    – Bring flowers.

    – Buy her clothes.

    – Cook (a lot)

    – Do Laundry. Dust. Vacuum. Sew buttons etc now and then.

    Things I know I do that don’t seem to work.

    – Avoid shopping without threats of bodily harm.

    – Forget everything it’s possible to forget. (Everything)

    – Leave my clothes next to the bed.

    – Pile papers and books on my desk.

    – Forget to turn off CEO-Me

    – Forget to turn off Philosopher-Me

    – Pretend I don’t know the answer or how to do it.

    – Ignore all attempts to ‘alter my priorities’

    – Express more frustration at being interrupted.

    – Fail to ignore stupidity

    – Appreciate beautiful women now and then.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 19:01:00 UTC

  • THE ERRORS OF OUR THINKING AT BOTH BOTTOM AND TOP Dunning-Kruger overconfidence

    THE ERRORS OF OUR THINKING AT BOTH BOTTOM AND TOP

    Dunning-Kruger overconfidence expresses a lack of ability. However, educational overconfidence expresses a lack of skepticism. Half truths whether theological, philosophical, historical, scientific, or formal, are sources of ignorance by providing us with overconfidence.

    Mathiness has been the source of formal, philosophical, and scientific (physical and social) ignorance. Philosophical sophistry has been the source of most of the rest of pseudo intellectual ignorance. And of course theological – a monopoly conflating all the falsehoods plus false promise – is the most ignorance inducing of all.

    It appears that there are a very small number of fundamental laws that can be taught to everyone at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the suppression of the parasitism of the elite classes.

    ===

    edit:

    Paragraph one – low end of the spectrum

    Paragraph two – high end of the spectrum

    Paragraph three – curing the problems of the high AND low ends of the spectrum

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 10:19:00 UTC

  • Mothers provide training wheels for adulthood. Adulthood requires you do without

    Mothers provide training wheels for adulthood. Adulthood requires you do without them. Men deny you political influence unless you do without them.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 08:05:00 UTC

  • Sometimes parents must be patient with their children; spouses must be patient w

    Sometimes parents must be patient with their children; spouses must be patient with their mates; teachers must be patient with students; executives must be patient with their employees. Because we all must ‘own’ our decisions and our status-self-image system, as well as our cognitive investment in current network of ideas, plans, and habits resists pressure to adapt – except at our own speed and on our own terms. So people must own their adaptation – because they must weigh the costs and benefits and come to own their choices. Sometimes it takes minutes, sometimes hours, sometimes months, and sometimes years. So plant seeds rather than persuade, convince, or coerce. And leave the door open. And resist the call of pride in saying “I told you so”. Instead deliver the reward of “I hoped you would.”

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 12:12:00 UTC

  • I’m stating that the genetic differences between human groups are degree of neot

    I’m stating that the genetic differences between human groups are degree of neoteny, dimorphism, rates and depths of maturity and so “domestication” – and that east asians and europeans practiced agrarian eugenics that eradicated the lower classes. Africans & Middle East didn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 01:39:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256035436725710848

    Reply addressees: @SherryLeigh5 @nb_617

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256033865128345606

  • Is it privilege, or earned reputation, or demonstrated superiority?

    Is it privilege, or earned reputation, or demonstrated superiority?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 01:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256029158297272320

    Reply addressees: @LynMCain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256027712885600256

  • I thought it was just empirical evidence of the difference between the behavior

    I thought it was just empirical evidence of the difference between the behavior of races, subraces, and classes.

    Or are you suggesting there is no neotonic, developmental, class size, and cultural therefore behavioral difference between races, subraces, and classes?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 01:13:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1256028848942190592

    Reply addressees: @nb_617

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255955780118831104

  • (female) Empathizing<--------------->Systematizing (male) (submission)agreeablen

    (female) Empathizing<—————>Systematizing (male)

    (submission)agreeableness<->disagreeableness(dominance)

    Interpersonal<———————————>Political

    Desirable or not <————————-> True or Not

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 09:57:00 UTC

  • Simple version: Resources. Novelty, symmetry, calories. Try to figure out how it

    Simple version: Resources. Novelty, symmetry, calories. Try to figure out how it is reducible to this.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 09:47:00 UTC