Feb 3, 2020, 7:07 AM by Eliza Thentor I realised this is my conflict with my daughter. ” Unregulated women ” . She is surrounded by girls who are much much less regulated than she is, and many are spoiled. One particular, who I thought, after a few conversations with mother, that mother was very shallow and something was not right. I learned last week, the woman has been years on anti-anxiety tablets and could not stay at home and therefore “had” to go to work because of muh anxiety and depression. This mother showers the girl with lots lots of money, out of guilt. So I try to regulate my daughter (as I come from a military father who regulated us) and she causes a big confusion at home, because her friends probably nag her or give her “advice” about me on the phone.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Unregulated (Without Limits) Women
Feb 3, 2020, 7:07 AM by Eliza Thentor I realised this is my conflict with my daughter. ” Unregulated women ” . She is surrounded by girls who are much much less regulated than she is, and many are spoiled. One particular, who I thought, after a few conversations with mother, that mother was very shallow and something was not right. I learned last week, the woman has been years on anti-anxiety tablets and could not stay at home and therefore “had” to go to work because of muh anxiety and depression. This mother showers the girl with lots lots of money, out of guilt. So I try to regulate my daughter (as I come from a military father who regulated us) and she causes a big confusion at home, because her friends probably nag her or give her “advice” about me on the phone.
-
Ideological Motivations, Options and Outcomes
Ideological Motivations, Options and Outcomes https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/ideological-motivations-options-and-outcomes/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:16:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264651430834683904
-
Ideological Motivations, Options and Outcomes
Feb 3, 2020, 10:25 AM People who want status or attention because they are rejected by the groups they work, live, or associate with, seek some sort of means of feeling they are winning – so they find a single lever (libertarianism, leftism, a philosophical frame, or a religion) and double down on it because it is their only means of obtaining some sense of success in the world through the expression of their preferences by dominance rather than by cooperation. This is an understandable human behavior. We cannot expect people to not negotiate or advance (or bully) for obtaining resources, status, cooperation, in a world where all three are scarce. … However, regardless of our preferences and wants we can argue for reciprocity or we can argue for irreciprocity. Or we can simply act irreciprocally by conquest if negotiation does not succeed, and separation is not possible. So one can argue in concert with the physical world or not. One can argue in concert with the social world or not. One can act in concert with the social world or not. But the reverse of each of those statements cannot be said, without one being a fool, a liar, and a thief – and thereby abandoning your sovereignty and entering into a condition of war where all morality is off the table. P is a method. That method defines reciprocity. And it states the limit of that reciprocity. And beyond that reciprocity there is no moral question – only war.
-
Ideological Motivations, Options and Outcomes
Feb 3, 2020, 10:25 AM People who want status or attention because they are rejected by the groups they work, live, or associate with, seek some sort of means of feeling they are winning – so they find a single lever (libertarianism, leftism, a philosophical frame, or a religion) and double down on it because it is their only means of obtaining some sense of success in the world through the expression of their preferences by dominance rather than by cooperation. This is an understandable human behavior. We cannot expect people to not negotiate or advance (or bully) for obtaining resources, status, cooperation, in a world where all three are scarce. … However, regardless of our preferences and wants we can argue for reciprocity or we can argue for irreciprocity. Or we can simply act irreciprocally by conquest if negotiation does not succeed, and separation is not possible. So one can argue in concert with the physical world or not. One can argue in concert with the social world or not. One can act in concert with the social world or not. But the reverse of each of those statements cannot be said, without one being a fool, a liar, and a thief – and thereby abandoning your sovereignty and entering into a condition of war where all morality is off the table. P is a method. That method defines reciprocity. And it states the limit of that reciprocity. And beyond that reciprocity there is no moral question – only war.
-
Solving the Female Question (FQ) is More Important.
—“Solving the Female Question (FQ) I sense is more important than the Religious or Christian Question. I appreciate this line of research.”—Bryan Nova Brey —“The Cog-Fem and Female\Herd persuasion\argument suppression stuff is still what I’ve gotten the most value out of from this circle. So I strongly suspect you’re correct.”—Grant Cameron McPhee —“Not everybody is religious, I have yet to meet a man who is interested in celibacy and doing his own laundry”—Ryan Williams
-
Solving the Female Question (FQ) is More Important.
—“Solving the Female Question (FQ) I sense is more important than the Religious or Christian Question. I appreciate this line of research.”—Bryan Nova Brey —“The Cog-Fem and Female\Herd persuasion\argument suppression stuff is still what I’ve gotten the most value out of from this circle. So I strongly suspect you’re correct.”—Grant Cameron McPhee —“Not everybody is religious, I have yet to meet a man who is interested in celibacy and doing his own laundry”—Ryan Williams
-
Why Does It Appear that The Relationship Between Intelligence and Income Disappe
Why Does It Appear that The Relationship Between Intelligence and Income Disappearing https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/why-does-it-appear-that-the-relationship-between-intelligence-and-income-disappearing/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 14:58:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264571396539256836
-
Why Does It Appear that The Relationship Between Intelligence and Income Disappearing
WHY DOES IT APPEAR THAT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE AND INCOME DISAPPEARING
—“Great study, but very puzzling that intelligence does not predict income in this study. Too young age at follow-up? Intelligence income relationship is confounded by age (at younger ages, lower intelligence people make more money). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wps.20763”—Emil O W Kirkegaard @KirkegaardEmil
(Short version: college eduction is no longer a proxy for intelligence). We have a set of problems in making that assessment.
(a) between women and underclass preference for pseudoscience, the use of degrees as proxy for intelligence has been eliminated.
(b) IQ doesn’t determine wealth: conscientiousness does.
(c) IQ determines complexity of work.
(d) BUT IQ also determines rate of adaptation, abstractions, error (and FRAUD) detection. So while we can make wealth anywhere on the spectrum there’s an increasing premium on learning, error detection, and abstraction (engineering, tech, law, finance, science, mathematics).
(e) the net (uncomfortable truth) is that, confirming tradition, there is a premium on ethics and discipline at the bottom and middle with increasing incentive for ‘cheating’ hidden in complexity at the top (finance, economics, politics), with the middle holding moral high ground. (Which is why I specialize in expansion of the law to reverse the innovations in free riding, cheating, fraud, parasitism, and predation made possible by the expansion of complexity during the 20th century. Particularly using math, econ, and academic pseudosciences. 😉 )
-
Why Does It Appear that The Relationship Between Intelligence and Income Disappearing
WHY DOES IT APPEAR THAT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTELLIGENCE AND INCOME DISAPPEARING
—“Great study, but very puzzling that intelligence does not predict income in this study. Too young age at follow-up? Intelligence income relationship is confounded by age (at younger ages, lower intelligence people make more money). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wps.20763”—Emil O W Kirkegaard @KirkegaardEmil
(Short version: college eduction is no longer a proxy for intelligence). We have a set of problems in making that assessment.
(a) between women and underclass preference for pseudoscience, the use of degrees as proxy for intelligence has been eliminated.
(b) IQ doesn’t determine wealth: conscientiousness does.
(c) IQ determines complexity of work.
(d) BUT IQ also determines rate of adaptation, abstractions, error (and FRAUD) detection. So while we can make wealth anywhere on the spectrum there’s an increasing premium on learning, error detection, and abstraction (engineering, tech, law, finance, science, mathematics).
(e) the net (uncomfortable truth) is that, confirming tradition, there is a premium on ethics and discipline at the bottom and middle with increasing incentive for ‘cheating’ hidden in complexity at the top (finance, economics, politics), with the middle holding moral high ground. (Which is why I specialize in expansion of the law to reverse the innovations in free riding, cheating, fraud, parasitism, and predation made possible by the expansion of complexity during the 20th century. Particularly using math, econ, and academic pseudosciences. 😉 )