Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Rates of Reproduction

    Jan 4, 2020, 11:17 AM

    1. Family members in USA and Canada. from 1500’s onward.
    2. Common eight, ten, twelve children. Almost universal.
    3. Common to lose a wife in childbirth and have two.
    4. Birthrate Lasts through civil war, industrial revolution. Then drops to six then to four, then three, now to two or even one.
    5. Almost universally husband and wife 5 years apart.
    6. Very common for english protestant men to marry french protestant then french catholic women. (disagreeableness an obedience)
    7. But very class driven.
    8. Both sides of family start out military. Paternal stays military. As usual, middle ranks.
    9. Prosecution of French proceeded that of Irish.
    10. English tended to be more middle class, french more lower classes.
    11. Both sides of the family originate in normandy, Dolietta’s going to England with the norman conquest, but then to the states, and the french left to Newfoundland, New Brunswick, or the Quebec settlements on the St Laurence river. After the french lose, 1M french move to the states.
    12. Poor French women were ‘russian brides’ of New France (Quebec). I only see one or two of those. All colonies were private entrepreneurial ventures, not state funded until they became strategic. Families were recruited. Men recruited, and when necessary, women (wives) recruited. The farther north the more likely they were to return to europe upon fulfillment of their contract. This is important since we don’t think of mothering and running a household as a career, but a woman’s choice was to be some other house-owning woman’s servant, or to get her own house, and so it was almost always preferable to have your own house, husband, and children to assist in the labor of running a household and farm.
    13. My family’s ‘legendary’ prosecution of the catholics in every way possible is somewhat funny since a lot of the maternal line is french, and a lot of it is clearly catholic, and at least one of my maternal great-x grandmothers was prohibited from practice of her religion upon marriage.
    14. No ‘irish’ until my paternal grandmother’s era, but they were pre-famine colonists, all from the east of Ireland, and it was three or four generations after integration.
    15. The men in my family are all over the middle class – probably because they’ve been literate since at least the 900s – military, reverends, lawyers, craftsmen, businessmen, fewer “ordinary” farmers, but even artists. The english tradition was farming in farm season and craftsmanship in off season, and warfare during the warring (high testosterone) summer months.
    16. All new englanders are inbred. Seriously. Until the Irish and Italians everyone was somehow related. 😉
    17. I love my NE people. they’re political ass clowns. But I love them anyway. And they make good business people and soldiers. They just need a monarchy to keep from virtue signaling themselves to death.
  • Rates of Reproduction

    Jan 4, 2020, 11:17 AM

    1. Family members in USA and Canada. from 1500’s onward.
    2. Common eight, ten, twelve children. Almost universal.
    3. Common to lose a wife in childbirth and have two.
    4. Birthrate Lasts through civil war, industrial revolution. Then drops to six then to four, then three, now to two or even one.
    5. Almost universally husband and wife 5 years apart.
    6. Very common for english protestant men to marry french protestant then french catholic women. (disagreeableness an obedience)
    7. But very class driven.
    8. Both sides of family start out military. Paternal stays military. As usual, middle ranks.
    9. Prosecution of French proceeded that of Irish.
    10. English tended to be more middle class, french more lower classes.
    11. Both sides of the family originate in normandy, Dolietta’s going to England with the norman conquest, but then to the states, and the french left to Newfoundland, New Brunswick, or the Quebec settlements on the St Laurence river. After the french lose, 1M french move to the states.
    12. Poor French women were ‘russian brides’ of New France (Quebec). I only see one or two of those. All colonies were private entrepreneurial ventures, not state funded until they became strategic. Families were recruited. Men recruited, and when necessary, women (wives) recruited. The farther north the more likely they were to return to europe upon fulfillment of their contract. This is important since we don’t think of mothering and running a household as a career, but a woman’s choice was to be some other house-owning woman’s servant, or to get her own house, and so it was almost always preferable to have your own house, husband, and children to assist in the labor of running a household and farm.
    13. My family’s ‘legendary’ prosecution of the catholics in every way possible is somewhat funny since a lot of the maternal line is french, and a lot of it is clearly catholic, and at least one of my maternal great-x grandmothers was prohibited from practice of her religion upon marriage.
    14. No ‘irish’ until my paternal grandmother’s era, but they were pre-famine colonists, all from the east of Ireland, and it was three or four generations after integration.
    15. The men in my family are all over the middle class – probably because they’ve been literate since at least the 900s – military, reverends, lawyers, craftsmen, businessmen, fewer “ordinary” farmers, but even artists. The english tradition was farming in farm season and craftsmanship in off season, and warfare during the warring (high testosterone) summer months.
    16. All new englanders are inbred. Seriously. Until the Irish and Italians everyone was somehow related. 😉
    17. I love my NE people. they’re political ass clowns. But I love them anyway. And they make good business people and soldiers. They just need a monarchy to keep from virtue signaling themselves to death.
  • Differences in Standards

    Jan 5, 2020, 2:53 PM by Vengefül Bobmoran High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of appearance of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone. The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us. They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.

  • Differences in Standards

    Jan 5, 2020, 2:53 PM by Vengefül Bobmoran High trust people require not only the absence of conflict of interest, but also the absence of appearance of conflict of interest, as the appearance itself is enough to erode trust and imposes a huge cost on everyone. The left applies the bare minimum ghetto ethic (no provable conflict of interest – cheap, easy deniability and pilpul) to its own, but will gladly apply our standards (no appearance of conflict of interest – expensive compliance) to us. They don’t even care about maintaining trust; they just intuit the huge costs of adherence to our standards and attack us with it, in the same way that they use the judicial process itself, rather than the judgement, as a weapon. This also explains how they can suddenly be more Catholic than the Pope when criticizing us: it’s all about maximizing the costs (damages) they can impose.

  • Male and Female Brains Are Different

    Male and Female Brains Are Different http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ene-femjvI&fbclid=IwAR0mnCIT6sS6CnSQPG7GlIebGLPAc8ohVNXA1ByBCvaFuzY1dixMm1MQ8Vc https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/male-and-female-brains-are-different/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 20:56:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265386287604748288

  • Height Aversion Is Genetic

    Height Aversion Is Genetic https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/height-aversion-is-genetic/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:18:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089913654931456

  • Height Aversion Is Genetic

    Jan 7, 2020, 3:49 PM I love it that height aversion is genetic. In the 90’s I had to take drugs to work on the 22nd floor, and even the 9th floor in Kiev was hard on me. I’m good thru about six. Otherwise it triggers the vertigo, and once it start’s is unmanageable. I can’t even watch videos, tv, or movies of heights. The vertigo sticks for up to three days. Worst episode was that dance club in Vegas at fifty something floors with a glass floor. I just lost my vision typing this by remembering it. I did fine until I broke my concentration. Once I did in like three seconds it was over. I had to keep my eyes closed and hug the wall all the way down. My sister can’t do bridges. They don’t bother me. Neither do planes. And I don’t have a problem on mountains, just buildings. It’s something about flatness – any time my brain can imagine the ground as a wall it’s over. I did this sales call once on the thirty-something floor of the Darth Vader building in Seattle. I sat in a chair and pressed my left foot down crossed legs, and pushed my right knee upward under the table for an anchor. The entire time the room was doing the whole carousel thing and I maintained composure. We got the deal. Really. The staff had no idea. Not until we got near the elevator and I couldn’t control it any longer. lol Truth is I think it was one of our few project failures. Company was in deeper trouble than they let on. They needed a contractor but wanted someone to take the liability. Doesn’t work that way. You want staff and cheap get a body shop. You want liability then you pay for it. That’s how tech works. But don’t ask for one and then try to morph it into the other. We did like 2500 projects a year last I recall. Always within 3%. Pretty much never failed. No matter what it takes. A good firm whether advertising, marketing, or tech, can only hold so many customers in the portfolio at any time and take ownership of success. Customer acquisition is like 250K. Much better to hold them. So if you gotta eat profit it’s totally worth it. But you gotta fire customers regularly if they don’t appreciate it.

  • Height Aversion Is Genetic

    Jan 7, 2020, 3:49 PM I love it that height aversion is genetic. In the 90’s I had to take drugs to work on the 22nd floor, and even the 9th floor in Kiev was hard on me. I’m good thru about six. Otherwise it triggers the vertigo, and once it start’s is unmanageable. I can’t even watch videos, tv, or movies of heights. The vertigo sticks for up to three days. Worst episode was that dance club in Vegas at fifty something floors with a glass floor. I just lost my vision typing this by remembering it. I did fine until I broke my concentration. Once I did in like three seconds it was over. I had to keep my eyes closed and hug the wall all the way down. My sister can’t do bridges. They don’t bother me. Neither do planes. And I don’t have a problem on mountains, just buildings. It’s something about flatness – any time my brain can imagine the ground as a wall it’s over. I did this sales call once on the thirty-something floor of the Darth Vader building in Seattle. I sat in a chair and pressed my left foot down crossed legs, and pushed my right knee upward under the table for an anchor. The entire time the room was doing the whole carousel thing and I maintained composure. We got the deal. Really. The staff had no idea. Not until we got near the elevator and I couldn’t control it any longer. lol Truth is I think it was one of our few project failures. Company was in deeper trouble than they let on. They needed a contractor but wanted someone to take the liability. Doesn’t work that way. You want staff and cheap get a body shop. You want liability then you pay for it. That’s how tech works. But don’t ask for one and then try to morph it into the other. We did like 2500 projects a year last I recall. Always within 3%. Pretty much never failed. No matter what it takes. A good firm whether advertising, marketing, or tech, can only hold so many customers in the portfolio at any time and take ownership of success. Customer acquisition is like 250K. Much better to hold them. So if you gotta eat profit it’s totally worth it. But you gotta fire customers regularly if they don’t appreciate it.