Nov 4, 2019, 9:55 AM www.researchgate.net researchgate.net https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331565083_Evidence_For_Bias_Of_Genetic_Ancestry_In_Resting_State_Functional_MRI?fbclid=IwAR1LW8E8QvKg6p-G-RNPWbQy57JJQxk57RnR9Bnzhy0cqWQ8yDUhHIpJfLU Well, now that we can tell your race and ethnicity from brain scan activity, the end is nigh for indifferences. Not only are physical differences in the brain obvious, not only are behavioral differences demonstrated by that brain obvious, but the internal operation of the brain is different. (Those researchers are brave to publish.)
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always fram
Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM
—“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person
by Brandon Hayes: Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂 You’re simply mistaking things. In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms. Shaming to maintain order. GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos). Shaming isn’t wrong. Subversion is. –The Propertarian Institute– ^He’s good. 😉 1 -So violence can be used to: … (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law. 2 – Shaming can be used to: … (a) subvert norms or enforce norms. 3 – The difference is: … (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime. … (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct … (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct. 4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to … (a) suppress truth … (b) undermine those who speak truth … (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.
-
Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM —“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always fram
Nov 9, 2019, 5:30 PM
—“I guess my question is: Why is the feminine always framed as negative or wrong? I understand GSRRM would be wrong for a male. But isn’t there an appropriate application? Is it only among women? Should it have any reach beyond that? Please excuse if I’m out of line here. I ask in all sincerity.”— New Person
by Brandon Hayes: Intellectual honesty will never be met with hostility here. 🙂 You’re simply mistaking things. In the case of stigma (scarlet letter) you’re talking about norms. Shaming to maintain order. GRSM is shaming to undermine order (create chaos). Shaming isn’t wrong. Subversion is. –The Propertarian Institute– ^He’s good. 😉 1 -So violence can be used to: … (a) violate law, or (b) enforce law. 2 – Shaming can be used to: … (a) subvert norms or enforce norms. 3 – The difference is: … (a) cost and severity of punishment must fit the crime. … (b) shaming is cheap to perform and to correct … (c) violence is expensive to perform and to correct. 4 – GSRRM (undermining) can be used to … (a) suppress truth … (b) undermine those who speak truth … (c) undermine societies that operate by trust and truth.
-
So Yeah, It’s Actually True that Europeans Are Genetically Superior. so Now What?
Nov 10, 2019, 4:47 PM
—“Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of many Western populations. We propose that part of this variation can be traced back to the action and diffusion of the Western Church, the branch of Christianity that evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Specifically, we propose that the Western Church’s transformation of European kinship, by promoting small, nuclear households, weak family ties, and residential mobility, fostered greater individualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality. By combining data on 24 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both Church exposure and kinship, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions, and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.”—
Correct, which is what Emmanuel Todd has said for three decades and what HBD-Chick specializes in. Now, the reason the church did this was purely evil: so that it could break up the large landholding families and gradually acquire the land, so that by the end of the high middle ages, half the land in europe, and half the capital was dead, and the surpluses were being used to build cathedrals etc (20% of gdp in particular). So the way to look at it is, that he church failed as a political force, and t failed to build ‘corporate europe’ but in doing so in parallel with aristocratic Manorialism, they created a genetic meat grinder for familism, creating our high tolerance and high pro-sociality. Now, the argument is that this is (a) an existing northern european disposition, (b) exacerbated by the church and (c) brought to fruition by manorialism, which (d) eventually reacted against church corruption, producing protestantism, and the conversion of christianity into a folk religion (non-institutional) and therefore ending the Byzantine conquest of roman empire, and subsequent conquest of europe. So, now that we know we’re genetically unique and SUPERIOR, then how do we preserve those millennia of capital inheritance.
-
So Yeah, It’s Actually True that Europeans Are Genetically Superior. so Now What?
Nov 10, 2019, 4:47 PM
—“Recent research not only confirms the existence of substantial psychological variation around the globe but also highlights the peculiarity of many Western populations. We propose that part of this variation can be traced back to the action and diffusion of the Western Church, the branch of Christianity that evolved into the Roman Catholic Church. Specifically, we propose that the Western Church’s transformation of European kinship, by promoting small, nuclear households, weak family ties, and residential mobility, fostered greater individualism, less conformity, and more impersonal prosociality. By combining data on 24 psychological outcomes with historical measures of both Church exposure and kinship, we find support for these ideas in a comprehensive array of analyses across countries, among European regions, and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds.”—
Correct, which is what Emmanuel Todd has said for three decades and what HBD-Chick specializes in. Now, the reason the church did this was purely evil: so that it could break up the large landholding families and gradually acquire the land, so that by the end of the high middle ages, half the land in europe, and half the capital was dead, and the surpluses were being used to build cathedrals etc (20% of gdp in particular). So the way to look at it is, that he church failed as a political force, and t failed to build ‘corporate europe’ but in doing so in parallel with aristocratic Manorialism, they created a genetic meat grinder for familism, creating our high tolerance and high pro-sociality. Now, the argument is that this is (a) an existing northern european disposition, (b) exacerbated by the church and (c) brought to fruition by manorialism, which (d) eventually reacted against church corruption, producing protestantism, and the conversion of christianity into a folk religion (non-institutional) and therefore ending the Byzantine conquest of roman empire, and subsequent conquest of europe. So, now that we know we’re genetically unique and SUPERIOR, then how do we preserve those millennia of capital inheritance.
-
Human Faculties
Nov 13, 2019, 9:28 AM
1. sense (neurons-nerves) 2. disambiguation (constant relations - cortex), 3. perception(integration-prediction - cortex), 4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion)) 5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex), 6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex) 7. and release of actions;
-
Human Faculties
Nov 13, 2019, 9:28 AM
1. sense (neurons-nerves) 2. disambiguation (constant relations - cortex), 3. perception(integration-prediction - cortex), 4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion)) 5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex), 6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex) 7. and release of actions;
-
The Series of Grammars of Psychology
The Series of Grammars of Psychology https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-series-of-grammars-of-psychology/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:42:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265503554980188161
-
The Series of Grammars of Psychology
Nov 24, 2019, 11:41 AM (important) (read this)
—”is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard
I think that it is always better to use this series:
- Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)
- Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)
- Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)
- Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)
Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)
This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories) (repost) Edit
-
The Series of Grammars of Psychology
Nov 24, 2019, 11:41 AM (important) (read this)
—”is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard
I think that it is always better to use this series:
- Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)
- Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)
- Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)
- Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)
Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)
This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories) (repost) Edit