Oct 14, 2019, 10:12 AM Women voluntarily pair with men, (a) to defend against involuntary pairing with other men; (b)to gain access to resource and defense, (c) status (market value) largely among women, (d) to capture genes, attention and resources and keep them away from other women, (e) mates will sacrifice more than all other combined except mothers for children (ie: friendship), (f) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than all other individual actions. This produces the emotional reaction of friendship: ready access to attention and care. Our emotions evolved to inform us that these are the optimum actions. Marriage is only an optimum under property. As we can see reversing in modernity. Successful people with assets stay together. Poor without them far less so. I can explain that also but it’s not very ‘nice’.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Recommended Reading
Oct 14, 2019, 1:40 PM Evolutionary Psychopathology: A Unified Approach amazon.com (thanks Eric Bumpus) Available in our Library and Libgen. 2018 book. Expensive. Not popular. However, if combined with Baron Cohen’s books on autism and gender differences in brain you will sort of have the via positiva and via negativa understanding.
-
Recommended Reading
Oct 14, 2019, 1:40 PM Evolutionary Psychopathology: A Unified Approach amazon.com (thanks Eric Bumpus) Available in our Library and Libgen. 2018 book. Expensive. Not popular. However, if combined with Baron Cohen’s books on autism and gender differences in brain you will sort of have the via positiva and via negativa understanding.
-
Consiousness
Consiousness https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/consiousness/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:07:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265691069888499713
-
Consiousness
Oct 14, 2019, 9:35 PM Consciousness: awareness of change in state of self (non-body), of spatial model of self (body), of space around self, of objects in the space around self, of place and location, of others, as the spatial movement of others, and the model in the mind of others. This is the sixth sense (biologically it is, this is how the mind constructs experience – just like a 3d video game.). We can imitate (act masculine bias), sympathize (incentives), empathize (feelings – feminine bias). We divide the the world into locations, boundaries, objects, places within the location (space), direction of movement, head direction, speed, and distance. We do this all predictively with about two seconds to compose a context, and updated about every tenth of a second. So we are continually predicting everything including the actions (imitation), thoughts (sympathy) and feelings (empathy) of others. The male brain is specialized from back to front (speed) independent of empathy, and the female brain is specialized laterally (context) independent of speed. All of us vary from masculine to feminine brain structures. This difference is large, and I think it’s on the scale of 1.5SD. Empathizing is time consuming. And it biases you to consensus, just as systematizing is consuming but biases you to truth. This is why women are better at telling you what an individual thinks or feels, and men are better at predicting the behavior of groups. (about .2-.6SD) averaged, with wide variation in individuals. So the female mind process vastly more information and communicates vastly more information between individuals and the male mind is far more concerned with groups and urgencies. In other words, ancient stereotypes are correct. Like all stereotypes – they are the most accurate measure in the social sciences.
-
Consiousness
Oct 14, 2019, 9:35 PM Consciousness: awareness of change in state of self (non-body), of spatial model of self (body), of space around self, of objects in the space around self, of place and location, of others, as the spatial movement of others, and the model in the mind of others. This is the sixth sense (biologically it is, this is how the mind constructs experience – just like a 3d video game.). We can imitate (act masculine bias), sympathize (incentives), empathize (feelings – feminine bias). We divide the the world into locations, boundaries, objects, places within the location (space), direction of movement, head direction, speed, and distance. We do this all predictively with about two seconds to compose a context, and updated about every tenth of a second. So we are continually predicting everything including the actions (imitation), thoughts (sympathy) and feelings (empathy) of others. The male brain is specialized from back to front (speed) independent of empathy, and the female brain is specialized laterally (context) independent of speed. All of us vary from masculine to feminine brain structures. This difference is large, and I think it’s on the scale of 1.5SD. Empathizing is time consuming. And it biases you to consensus, just as systematizing is consuming but biases you to truth. This is why women are better at telling you what an individual thinks or feels, and men are better at predicting the behavior of groups. (about .2-.6SD) averaged, with wide variation in individuals. So the female mind process vastly more information and communicates vastly more information between individuals and the male mind is far more concerned with groups and urgencies. In other words, ancient stereotypes are correct. Like all stereotypes – they are the most accurate measure in the social sciences.
-
Feeling Good Isn’t a Test of Anything
Oct 16, 2019, 7:38 PM Meth, Heroin, Cocaine all feel good. Sugar feels good. Wheat feels good. Pornography feels good. The fake affections of prostitutes feel good. Comforting lies feel good. Hyperconsumption feels good. Virtue signaling feels good. Feeling good isn’t a test of anything other than the sensations we evolved as hunter gatherers. We have developed many means under agrarianism, pastoralism, civilization, industrialism, and the sciences, by which to achieve sensations that we could not obtain from the natural world except as subtle cues to scarcity. That something feels good (or bad) in the moment tells us very little about whether it is cumulatively good for us, for those around us, for our people, civilizations, and man. The opiates of the masses indeed do feel good. They are however extremely BAD for us. In fact, they are genocidal. ~Curt Doolittle
-
Feeling Good Isn’t a Test of Anything
Oct 16, 2019, 7:38 PM Meth, Heroin, Cocaine all feel good. Sugar feels good. Wheat feels good. Pornography feels good. The fake affections of prostitutes feel good. Comforting lies feel good. Hyperconsumption feels good. Virtue signaling feels good. Feeling good isn’t a test of anything other than the sensations we evolved as hunter gatherers. We have developed many means under agrarianism, pastoralism, civilization, industrialism, and the sciences, by which to achieve sensations that we could not obtain from the natural world except as subtle cues to scarcity. That something feels good (or bad) in the moment tells us very little about whether it is cumulatively good for us, for those around us, for our people, civilizations, and man. The opiates of the masses indeed do feel good. They are however extremely BAD for us. In fact, they are genocidal. ~Curt Doolittle
-
Never Attribute to The Moral What Is Merely Self Interest
Never Attribute to The Moral What Is Merely Self Interest https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/never-attribute-to-the-moral-what-is-merely-self-interest/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:53:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265687633138790401
-
Charles Murray Puts It on The Line
Charles Murray Puts It on The Line https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/charles-murray-puts-it-on-the-line/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 16:50:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265686727882092549