Mar 24, 2020, 3:57 PM Let me help. Class measures your sexual, social, economic, political, military market value. One can work to improve those market values. One can ride on those market values. One can depreciate those market values. Like intelligence, class tends to scale evenly across all market values, except at the extremes. There are poor, attractive aristocrats and wealthy attractive entertainers. But as a general rule, class like stereotypes is the second a most accurate measure in social science.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
The Obvious Trade Offs: Agency vs Reaction Time
Mar 25, 2020, 11:32 AM Neoteny gives us opportunity for agency.
—“In 1991, Richard Lynn tested 1,468 9-year old children consisting of Blacks from South Africa, East Asians from Hong Kong and Japan, and Whites from Britain and Ireland. The content of the tests involved flipping a switch after one or more lights came on. Lynn found that the decision times (the time taken to make a decision about what to do) had a low correlation with IQ data on Raven’s Progressive Matrices tests also administered during the same study, and that movement times (the time taken to execute the decision) did not show any correlation. He found that the Asians had the fastest decision times, followed by the Whites, and then by the Blacks. He also determined that the Black children had movement times that were substantially faster than those of Whites and Asians on certain tests.[95] Studies by Jensen have shown similar patterns in response time on tests of arithmetic[96] and international studies by Lynn have also asserted the same trend.[97]”—
-
The Obvious Trade Offs: Agency vs Reaction Time
Mar 25, 2020, 11:32 AM Neoteny gives us opportunity for agency.
—“In 1991, Richard Lynn tested 1,468 9-year old children consisting of Blacks from South Africa, East Asians from Hong Kong and Japan, and Whites from Britain and Ireland. The content of the tests involved flipping a switch after one or more lights came on. Lynn found that the decision times (the time taken to make a decision about what to do) had a low correlation with IQ data on Raven’s Progressive Matrices tests also administered during the same study, and that movement times (the time taken to execute the decision) did not show any correlation. He found that the Asians had the fastest decision times, followed by the Whites, and then by the Blacks. He also determined that the Black children had movement times that were substantially faster than those of Whites and Asians on certain tests.[95] Studies by Jensen have shown similar patterns in response time on tests of arithmetic[96] and international studies by Lynn have also asserted the same trend.[97]”—
-
Predators and Parasites
Mar 28, 2020, 3:52 PM
“We’re apex predators. The problem is they’re apex parasites. Parasites are the most effective weapon against apex predators.”
That’s the narrative. How does one obtain restitution from the parasite?
-
Predators and Parasites
Mar 28, 2020, 3:52 PM
“We’re apex predators. The problem is they’re apex parasites. Parasites are the most effective weapon against apex predators.”
That’s the narrative. How does one obtain restitution from the parasite?
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
The Difficult Idea to Get Across https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-difficult-idea-to-get-across/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:43:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265986956338528256
-
The Difficult Idea to Get Across
Apr 1, 2020, 12:27 PM (important) When I say “the big problem is switching people from idealism (homogenous bias) under which each person seeks whatever bias fits his, to realism (heterogeneous bias) that is aware of the market competition. In other words, monopoly is endemic in western moral thinking bcause we’ve been homogenous since our beginnings. So we have no means of defense against the LIE of the value of diversity. This is yet another example of the f—king stupidity of libertarian tropes (sophistry). If you build high trust high value commons, then diversity increases transaction costs that all ancestors worked to reduce. So the reason we seek SOME diversity is to increase novelty because we seek to hyper-consume cheap novelty (consumption that destroys commons) rather than expensive novelty (innovation, continued capitalization of commons). I don’t know how to explain this more simply. I would appreciate anyone who could. Leftists spend down inheritance to feed herd instinct for numbers.
-
Man’s Competitive Advantage
Man’s Competitive Advantage https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/mans-competitive-advantage-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 04:27:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265862142470828032
-
There Never Can Be
Apr 14, 2020, 11:29 AM No there aren’t any civilizations led by female intellectuals so to speak – there never can be – the female strategy of undermining, hyper-consumption, hypergamy and equality is unsurvivable – a violation of evolutionary law. That doesn’t stop the jewish intellectuals from advancing the female group strategy despite the fact that all it can ever achieve is equilibrium (western civilization prior to enfranchisement) but that all female civilizations always and everywhere are defeated and always will be.
-
There Never Can Be
Apr 14, 2020, 11:29 AM No there aren’t any civilizations led by female intellectuals so to speak – there never can be – the female strategy of undermining, hyper-consumption, hypergamy and equality is unsurvivable – a violation of evolutionary law. That doesn’t stop the jewish intellectuals from advancing the female group strategy despite the fact that all it can ever achieve is equilibrium (western civilization prior to enfranchisement) but that all female civilizations always and everywhere are defeated and always will be.