Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • How to Say No

    'HOW TO SAY NO.
Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: "cross your arms, palms outward, and say no". If you don't do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It's that simple. I've only encountered it once - when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It's absolutely clear, doesn't really need vocalization or expression. It means 'break contact'. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.'
    HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: “cross your arms, palms outward, and say no”. If you don’t do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It’s that simple. I’ve only encountered it once – when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It’s absolutely clear, doesn’t really need vocalization or expression. It means ‘break contact’. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.
  • How to Say No

    'HOW TO SAY NO.
Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: "cross your arms, palms outward, and say no". If you don't do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It's that simple. I've only encountered it once - when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It's absolutely clear, doesn't really need vocalization or expression. It means 'break contact'. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.'
    HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: “cross your arms, palms outward, and say no”. If you don’t do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It’s that simple. I’ve only encountered it once – when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It’s absolutely clear, doesn’t really need vocalization or expression. It means ‘break contact’. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.
  • We Must Fix One Way or The Other – Now.

    Mar 14, 2020, 12:13 PM If you’re a man living in the USA you don’t know how much more relaxed you are in an eastern block country where men still naturally act like men, women like women, and treat each other as men and women expect to be treated. This “unnatural” condition inspired by the left, is something we must fix one way or the other – now.

  • Omniscient and Omnipotent, Not Omnipresent

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:16 PM

    —“Hey Curt – When you speak about Agency, I often see you define the highest point of Agency as omniscience and omnipresence. You stop short of mentioning omnipotence – why is that? …. Say you possess full Agency, you’re omniscient and omnipresent, and not limited by ignorance, intelligence, impulse, your body, technology, a lack of resources or the external impediments placed on you by others…does that not make you omnipotent, also?”—

    I don’t make that mistake. Others do. I don’t correct them because I assume they’re just confused. If I ever said anything like that it’s an autocorrect error. Omniscient (knowledge) is practically possible within limits. Omnipotent (action) is practically possible within limits Omnipresence (everywhere at once) is impossible regardless of limits because it’s by definition unlimited. The christian claim is that god is omnipresent. That’s where people are getting the error from. Christianity.

  • Omniscient and Omnipotent, Not Omnipresent

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:16 PM

    —“Hey Curt – When you speak about Agency, I often see you define the highest point of Agency as omniscience and omnipresence. You stop short of mentioning omnipotence – why is that? …. Say you possess full Agency, you’re omniscient and omnipresent, and not limited by ignorance, intelligence, impulse, your body, technology, a lack of resources or the external impediments placed on you by others…does that not make you omnipotent, also?”—

    I don’t make that mistake. Others do. I don’t correct them because I assume they’re just confused. If I ever said anything like that it’s an autocorrect error. Omniscient (knowledge) is practically possible within limits. Omnipotent (action) is practically possible within limits Omnipresence (everywhere at once) is impossible regardless of limits because it’s by definition unlimited. The christian claim is that god is omnipresent. That’s where people are getting the error from. Christianity.

  • Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?

    Mar 18, 2020, 12:39 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict.

    1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard.

    —“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.

  • Why Does the Left Have to Lie and Deny Differences?

    Mar 18, 2020, 12:39 PM The Left= Female Conflict Strategy: Deny, Avoid, Substitute Approval for Truth, Justify, Use Sophistry, Ad Hominem(gsrrm), Rally, Undermine, Strawman, Bait Into Conflict, Bait Into Hazard, Free Ride, Rent Seek, Hyperconsumption, Hypergamy, “Unconscious: The Men Will Take Care of It” The left has to lie. WHY? The suite of programs we have seen in marxism, communism, socialism, Neo-Marxism(cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism(political correctness) are an attempt to undermine every single system of class and gender harmony in tripartite western civilization from within by the false promise of freedom from evolutionary pressures (Darwin), under the pretense that admittedly meritocratic and eugenic western civlization oppressed rather than incrementally domesticated ourselves. And that this strategy – the cause of our successes – is antithetical to the female reproductive strategy, female cognition, and the female group strategy of intellectuals behind marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD-Denialism. We enfranchised this hostile intellectual group, and women at roughly the same time, and gave elites at practicing the female group strategy, and an audience of easily deceived newly enfranchised females, on top of our traditional underclasses, a market to ply with 51% of the vote, 70% of consumption of government services, and 70% of consumer spending. And we did not give them time to integrate into the franchise, rule of law, meritocracy, and to absorb the shock, before the postwar campaign to undermine western civlization through them. Marxism, postmodernism, feminism together are just a repeated of judaism, christianity islam to undermine the aristocratic empires of the ancient world. And we saw the loss of the arts, letters, culture, civilization and genomes of five great civilizations civilization reduced to dysgenia, decline, regression, ignorance, and superstition. The female group conflict strategy? ie: bait others into conflict.

    1. Feminine Undermining: Interpersonal and Social Superpredators 2. Female advocacy strategy: “heaping undue praise”, give everyone a prize, giving false compliments. 3. Female Conflict Strategy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, straw manning, and reputation destruction without end (destruction). 4. Female anti-social behavior: promiscuity, impulsivity, drugs, alcohol, lying, needling, conflict generation, attention seeking, shrilling, outraging. 5. Female Technique: Seduction: False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard.

    —“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty; By Pretense of Plausible Deniability; Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s); And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), And Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, And Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”— False promise of freedom from low status and agency. False promise of ability to rule and develop agency. Destruction of civlization culture, arts, knowledge, traditions. The repeat of the christian destruction of the ancient world. Through women and slaves in the old world. Through women and immigrants in the new world. If not for immigrants we would have defeated them. Democracy by 92 Intelligence differences by 99 Gender differences by 12 Group differences in 19 Science would have won. They won by the immigration act. Not by ideas. The romans were too tolerant. So are we. The only way to defeat a social superpredator is with a physical superpredator.

  • Pragmatic? Or…

    Mar 18, 2020, 7:22 PM

    —“I’m pragmatic – why am I reading this if I know that the need for women to raise children is going to destroy that beautiful essay on law or that poetry of grammar that you just wrote.”—

    I want to know whether you are pragmatic or simply advocating islamisation, or orthodoxy, or dictatorship, meaning we must coddle our women and lie, and abandon the european rule of law project. All I hear so far is criticisms of western behavior, and demand for either russian authority, or islamic authority, but I don’t hear anything western about it. I don’t hear how we continue the benefits of western civilization. One of the techniques of Critique is to criticize without offering a superior alternative, in order to justify a status quo. This is how the jewish intellectuals undermined western civlization with Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida et al, and the thousands and thousands of advocates. So, what’s your solution instead? Is it islam?

  • Pragmatic? Or…

    Mar 18, 2020, 7:22 PM

    —“I’m pragmatic – why am I reading this if I know that the need for women to raise children is going to destroy that beautiful essay on law or that poetry of grammar that you just wrote.”—

    I want to know whether you are pragmatic or simply advocating islamisation, or orthodoxy, or dictatorship, meaning we must coddle our women and lie, and abandon the european rule of law project. All I hear so far is criticisms of western behavior, and demand for either russian authority, or islamic authority, but I don’t hear anything western about it. I don’t hear how we continue the benefits of western civilization. One of the techniques of Critique is to criticize without offering a superior alternative, in order to justify a status quo. This is how the jewish intellectuals undermined western civlization with Boas, Freud, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Friedan, Derrida et al, and the thousands and thousands of advocates. So, what’s your solution instead? Is it islam?

  • The High Range Correlates Negatively with Indicators of Disorder and Deviance

    The High Range Correlates Negatively with Indicators of Disorder and Deviance https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-high-range-correlates-negatively-with-indicators-of-disorder-and-deviance/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 21:18:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266116699482398726