Category: Evolutionary Computation and Systems

  • You are confusing the organizing capacity of cellular cooperation limited to tri

    You are confusing the organizing capacity of cellular cooperation limited to trial and error with the organizing capacity of sentinent cooperation that can predict alternatives and choose by rational incentives.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 08:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736669943595212804

    Reply addressees: @NewAlexandria

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736602268806308257

  • Darwinian calculation of evolutionary superiority (advantage) by adversarial com

    Darwinian calculation of evolutionary superiority (advantage) by adversarial competition. Meaning the lower half serves the purpose of incentivizing the upper alf what not to do more so than any other purpose.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 09:16:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735227231914402252

    Reply addressees: @NWOBruh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735135261984477276

  • Yes this is my project: “formal operational construction of the logics of the hi

    Yes this is my project: “formal operational construction of the logics of the hierarchy of disciplines from first principles produced by the procss of of evolutionary computation.”
    (Cardinal > Ordinal > Natural > Operational)
    Yes, I think as you do in geometry and we begin with geometry as the first logic (grammar).
    Instead of notations (symbols) we use operational grammar (essentially programming language) because it’s easier to read but ‘wordy’.
    But yes it is reducible to notation (for those of us who are supernerds at least).
    I (we) focus on publishing books instead of papers, and we are trying to get the first book out the door.
    So we work with one first principle, a hierarchy of rules of ternary logic, each describing the exprssion of ternary logic, and we work with a set of rules of operational grammar that basically convert sentences into statements of equilibriuim.
    So yes. We say (i say) it looks like english but it’s just math or programming.

    Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-13 11:52:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1724032567668551680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1723968724363874387

  • BTW: also presumes that even instincts are not the result of accumulated experie

    BTW: also presumes that even instincts are not the result of accumulated experience recorded in genetics instead of repetition of experiences via traditions in memories.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 17:58:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720500836541796701

    Reply addressees: @bojenkins_s @AleMartnezR1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720491298665459905

  • ALl of existence is just an effort do use trial and error to compute persistence

    ALl of existence is just an effort do use trial and error to compute persistence of stable relations of negative-entropy – defeating the dark forces of time and ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 17:43:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719772170086228115

    Reply addressees: @BlakeAn77455669

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719762190176002102

  • King of the hill game. Research

    King of the hill game.

    Research


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-30 18:14:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719055181277536512

    Reply addressees: @2by4Value @jcallahanbryant @Gene76244311

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718986285094687174

  • What happens if you don’t plan for the future in subsaharan africa or the brazil

    What happens if you don’t plan for the future in subsaharan africa or the brazillian rain forest?
    What happens if you don’t plan for the future along the ice sheet?
    (selection)
    AND
    What happens when you live largely outdoors in open territory?
    What happens when you live in close quarters in winter?
    (selection)
    AND
    What happens when you live in small populations near other small populations?
    What happens when you have a small isolated population amidst other small isolated populations?
    (selection)
    What happens in the disease gradient of africa vs the winter regions?
    (selection for very different things)

    Reply addressees: @madmikeross @DwightExMachina


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-13 16:55:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712874748781146112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712873393446703165

  • Odd. I wanted to make very simple points with this post, but I’m not sure they c

    Odd. I wanted to make very simple points with this post, but I’m not sure they came across.

    Part I
    1 – We are all bots. As bots, we run cultural software on a genetic operating system – and our personalities serve as negotiating agents for our genetics using presumptions and… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1711117350873829612


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-09 17:37:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711435630624837978

  • WHY DOES SEX EXIST? In the context of the hierarchy of evolutionary computation,

    WHY DOES SEX EXIST?
    In the context of the hierarchy of evolutionary computation, it’s odd that mitochondria in eukaryotes fulfill the male strategy of energy production within cells, but they’re inherited from the female. The perception it’s an oddity only makes sense when we see the emergence of sexes. Because sexes divide labor. And the emergence of sexes only makes sense in a constantly changing and ‘hostile’ environment. (Blame god it’s his idea.)

    1. Sex Evolves When Selection Changes Over Time
    2. Sex Evolves When Selection Changes Over Space
    3. Sex Evolves When Organisms Are Less Adapted to Their Environment (Stress)
    4. Sex Evolves When Populations Are Finite (Lack of Resistance)
    In other words, sexes and sex increase evolutionary computation in time when under pressure. So sex defeats time. And that’s why it exists.
    Or stated otherwise, asexuality is dangerous to organizational complexity.

    –“…even though asexual lineages do arise, they rarely persist for long periods of evolutionary time. Among flowering plants, for example, predominantly asexual lineages have arisen over 300 times, yet none of these lineages is very old.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-06 09:53:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1710231699743703040

  • It’s meaningless. All life must acquire. Life can acquire without movement, or w

    It’s meaningless.
    All life must acquire.
    Life can acquire without movement, or with movement.
    Movement increases probability though at the cost of movement.
    Memory allows for prediction, though at the cost of memory and movement.
    Involuntary cooperation allows for multipliers not possible by individual organisms at the cost of selecting predictions for the outcome of cooperation.
    Voluntary cooperation allows for multiples not possible by individual organisms and involuntary organisms, but allows for the costs of defection, cheating, harming.
    The division of temporal labor between the sexes: female short term hyperconsumption and risk evasion causing evasion of responsibility for commons, vs male long term hyper capitalization at the cost of risk mitigation, causing status by competition for responsibility for commons.
    The amount of memory (neural volume) increases the number of parallel predictions (the field of predictions) an individual human can choose from, over longer periods of time, over greater populations, and over greater complexity.
    The variation in neural volume, neural fitness (adaptation in time) determines the division of labor between individuals in addition to the division of labor between sexes creating the division of labor between classes.
    The variation in systemic knowledge, general knowledge and experience, and specific skills further determines the division of labor between individuals, classes, and sexes.
    The organization of metaphysical presumptions, group strategy, sex strategy, class strategy, individual strategy combines with the organization of individuals into families, clans, tribes, nations, civilizations, and races.
    The organization of knowledge production, invention, prediction, production distribution, trade and consumption by the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, institutions and war, organizes people with and a cross clans tribes and sometimes nations.
    This organization is habituated by metaphysical presumptions, group strategy, mythology, institutions, traditions, norms, habits, and fashions- and humans are highly resistant to modification of the accumulation of above networks of understanding and relationships – in no small part because only about ten percent of humans do and can think – the rest merely react and then way-find a justification to their reaction given the above stack of indoctrination, habits, knowledge and incentives.

    THEREFORE
    Acquisition is meaningful
    Cooperation is meaningful
    Reciprocity of cooperation is meaningful.
    Division of labor by many dimensions is meaningful
    Cooperation in overlapping networks at increasing scales is meaningful.
    Because we are all more affected by the behavior of those we share a polity with than we are our own words and deeds (actions).
    As such it is the production of commons that is more meaningful than the production of individuals.
    As such the purpose of law is to prohibit interference in the potential of cooperation in divisions of labor at increasing scales.
    And the purpose of policy is the production of commons that remove frictions to cooperation, including the reduction of free riding, irreciprocity, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, rent seeking, corruption, lawfare, and authoritarianism – granting priority to the capital produced by the inter generational family before that of the individual, who, until producing offspring is a dead weight on accumulated spectrum of physical, behavioral, and genetic capital.

    Now if you’re competent to make a judgement sufficient to hold an opinion, just in that sequence what did mises get wrong before we even begin to attack his epistemology – which upon his later years, he quietly recognized was false.

    Reply addressees: @StephaneGeyres @LudwigArisleib @FromKulak @ViandeTiede666 @paulericblanrue @arthurhomines


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 21:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708962526862487552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708943167473557720