THE METHOD II – Group Evolutionary Strategies and their Consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsreJFlB6fQ
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-10 17:58:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106212198552900210
Category: Evolutionary Computation and Systems
-
THE METHOD II – Group Evolutionary Strategies and their Consequences
-
it’s simply the discovery of institutions that continue natural selection vs tho
it’s simply the discovery of institutions that continue natural selection vs those that only slowly accept it, vs reject it, vs revolt against it.
But yeah, you know, Homo Sapiens defeats Neanderthal and Steppe Defeats Agrarian Priesthoods.
Natural selection isn’t kind.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-10 17:57:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1391814772258136071
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1391813483474325504
-
THE METHOD II – Group Evolutionary Strategies and their Consequences
THE METHOD II – Group Evolutionary Strategies and their Consequences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsreJFlB6fQ
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-10 17:55:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1391814236297433088
-
4) Taleb was lost in statistics (top down) instead of computations (bottom up) (
4) Taleb was lost in statistics (top down) instead of computations (bottom up) (positiva) and law (negativa). And you are stuck arguing with idiots over the digital structure of dna, the necessity of the bell curve, or hayek’s treatment of norms and knowledge as national capital.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-27 17:39:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387098994820751362
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray @chasrmartin @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1387098123298803716
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@charlesmurray @chasrmartin @primalpoly 3. Babbage failed to systematize computation as greater is scope than mathematics. Darwin was deprived of answering the riddle of evolution. Mathematics, physics, philosophy and economics were re-platonized, and we had Hayek’s “Century of Mysticism” (pseudoscience).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1387098123298803716
-
We learn: 1) evolution requires a continuous increase in energy transformation.
We learn:
1) evolution requires a continuous increase in energy transformation.
2) we long ago nearly exhausted our bodies.
3) we recently exhausted the planet’s capacity
There is only one problem: Underclass reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-20 18:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373346526815260678
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373346525846384641
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Evolution tells a story of an organism’s increase in adaptability by direction of calories to cognition, first by running, second by cooperation, third by technical innovation, fourth by verbal innovation, and last by cognitive innovation.
It’s just physics. 😉
What do we learn?Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1373346525846384641
-
Evolution tells a story of an organism’s increase in adaptability by direction o
Evolution tells a story of an organism’s increase in adaptability by direction of calories to cognition, first by running, second by cooperation, third by technical innovation, fourth by verbal innovation, and last by cognitive innovation.
It’s just physics. 😉
What do we learn?
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-20 18:51:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373346525846384641
-
Not that it isn’t obvious, but (a) intelligence = adaptation, (b) adaptation = e
Not that it isn’t obvious, but (a) intelligence = adaptation, (b) adaptation = evolution (c) faster evolution that produces higher capture of energy ‘wins’. (d) we are never free of the race with the red queen. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1368915274179764227
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-08 18:46:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368996475791941635
-
2. then for machines outside the body. 3. now we are producing energy for cognit
2. then for machines outside the body.
3. now we are producing energy for cognition outside of the body.
4. evolution requires innovation and adaptation and the only problem we face is population in relation to energy production.
POPULATIONS (OF UNFIT) NEED TO SHRINK
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-08 18:43:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368995806641070081
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368995805630173187
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1. Almost everyone has the formula wrong. Evolution required more bodily energy, and we consumed nearly everything on the planet available. So we started cultivating our own energy. Then we started producing energy directly for use outside the body.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1368995805630173187
-
1. Almost everyone has the formula wrong. Evolution required more bodily energy,
1. Almost everyone has the formula wrong. Evolution required more bodily energy, and we consumed nearly everything on the planet available. So we started cultivating our own energy. Then we started producing energy directly for use outside the body.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-08 18:43:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368995805630173187
-
Funny, but computational irreducibility (the inability to provide a mathematical
Funny, but computational irreducibility (the inability to provide a mathematical description for some phenomena), isn’t any different from the impossibility of introspection.
However, once you know the function (operations) you can describe all of human experience. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1368345765907693574
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-06 23:44:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368346656916275202
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1368345765907693574