RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Falsify stigmergy before entertaining conspiracy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-29 00:31:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1575282146398420992
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Falsify stigmergy before entertaining conspiracy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-29 00:31:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1575282146398420992
Evolutionary computation is only limited by available energy. The question is whether we can access and convert more energy. Dunno.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-20 21:08:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1572331944087781376
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1572330123898290176
RT @Dek01907133: @curtdoolittle @Brick28962302 It seems like with every evolutionary step, our perception of scarcity evolves and accomodat…
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-17 17:15:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1571186154845659139
RT @curtdoolittle: @pc20917967 @FlvxSurfing @ClearRealist @PhilipProudfoot All evolutionary computation since the evolution of sex as a vas…
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 02:06:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568783080214900738
RT @curtdoolittle: @FlvxSurfing @pc20917967 @ClearRealist @PhilipProudfoot Effectively we evolved to maximize in adaptation itself rather t…
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 02:06:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568783004838891526
Effectively we evolved to maximize in adaptation itself rather than just adaptation to a niche. In other words, our niche is adaptation itself: hyperadaptability.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 02:04:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568782534602891264
Reply addressees: @FlvxSurfing @pc20917967 @ClearRealist @PhilipProudfoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568782262640037889
We are ‘interesting’ in that we can be aware of these differences. And moreover, that ‘the greater the difference between the instincts of the sexes the greater the computational range of discovery possible, and the more necessary is cooperation to calculate new successes.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 02:02:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568782071027343360
Reply addressees: @pc20917967 @FlvxSurfing @ClearRealist @PhilipProudfoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568781245034942464
All evolutionary computation since the evolution of sex as a vast multiplier of possibilities, is by variation in distribution of sex differences that exploit opportunities. Only the emergence of cooperation then voluntary cooperation accelerated evolutionary computation.
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-11 02:01:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568781815791628289
Reply addressees: @pc20917967 @FlvxSurfing @ClearRealist @PhilipProudfoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568781245034942464
Please note continuity between my geostrategic predictions, with my efforts to explain the limits of sets, math, computation, operation, and simulation vs evolutionary (random) computation. And its relation to Mandelbrot-Taleb’s work: mathiness isn’t just bad in physics and econ. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1568275058346397699
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-09 16:36:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1568277065517961216
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1568275058346397699
I mean, if I talk about the problems of formation of stable relations between emergent dipoles, as a foundation for evolutionary computation in quantum theory, you wouldn’t assume you understood? Why would you understand the same logic at cognitive, behavioral social scale?
Source date (UTC): 2022-09-07 16:22:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567548968132911105
Reply addressees: @read_flint @KWintie @KevinLogan1875
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1567546461885288448