Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Too many to list. Think of it more as a reduction to first principles of the pre

    Too many to list. Think of it more as a reduction to first principles of the present state of all knowledge across all disciplines – which is, of course, my project: universal commensurability and testifiability (truth). A project that was not possible for previous generations.

    Where possible I make use of terms from existing terminology and research and then explain them causally. This should and does lower the resistance to the ideas. I avoid neologisms whenever possible. And prefer to ‘correctly’ disambiguate and define terms instead.

    Reply addressees: @bootlegapples


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:12:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769789076725489664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769788209901281661

  • RL: Hmmm…. There is a chance you will ‘give up’ and plateau if you cannot main

    RL: Hmmm…. There is a chance you will ‘give up’ and plateau if you cannot maintain the pursuit of truth regardless of consequence, from which, you then attempt to determine the possible goods. Every single philosopher who failed sought the good instead of the true. Every attempt resulted in a fantasy moral literature that was but a failed attempt to bridge religion and science for those that entertain themselves with ideas no more meaningful or important than those of fiction and myth.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 04:53:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769225402113826816

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769066707094470741

  • 1) Just as the syllogism, and just as formal logic, sets contain less informatio

    1) Just as the syllogism, and just as formal logic, sets contain less information than do operations, and constructive operations from first principles contain the most information possible (completeness).
    2) All logics are falsificationary, not justificationary.
    3) All logics…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-16 16:35:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769039895736009199

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769035867618742425

  • Correct. Hence “Construction from first principles” 😉

    Correct. Hence “Construction from first principles” 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 19:35:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767273070673186862

    Reply addressees: @Will_of_Europa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767267083614605555

  • What is the ultimate first principle in your understanding? That will help me tr

    What is the ultimate first principle in your understanding? That will help me translate your position quickly.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 18:17:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767253439975743649

    Reply addressees: @josh61597760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767253058625376364

  • We address this issue with ‘limits based reasoning, and full accounting’. Cheste

    We address this issue with ‘limits based reasoning, and full accounting’. Chesterson’s era lacked the knowledge of the universe that we have learned, and so he couldn’t think beyond the second order framework. But the general direction of his reasoning was correct. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 17:12:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767237075256955035

    Reply addressees: @FuryForth @GlitchAmer85803 @Y_Contributor @RebuildingtheA2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767042262242828564

  • Yes true, but our concern is ‘universal commensurability’ in other words we are

    Yes true, but our concern is ‘universal commensurability’ in other words we are trying to produce ‘the final logic’ across all disciplines. My work in behavioral science and logic and Michael’s work in Mathematics both achieve this end. I start with first principles, and explain…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 17:07:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767235940014051381

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767234667286040991

  • I’m probably one of the better logicians living and working today. Sophistry is

    I’m probably one of the better logicians living and working today. Sophistry is not the same as logic any more than fiction is the same as testimony. Michael Huemer is stating what the argument consists of, not that it’s correct. In other words he’s demonstrating what’s wrong…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 22:45:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766958476276678865

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766953044967670173

  • Those who deny suppress and obscure the truth are simply liars. And the success

    Those who deny suppress and obscure the truth are simply liars. And the success of the west depends upon one of its uniqueness: “truth before face regardless of cost”. It is this origin of western success that the feminine seditious dysgenic left seeks to undermine by promoting…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-10 22:07:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766948914190528740

    Reply addressees: @GlitchAmer85803 @Y_Contributor @RebuildingtheA2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766941734511190247

  • HELP: QUESTION FOR FELLOW SUPERNERDS: Here I’ve posted the same set of concepts

    HELP: QUESTION FOR FELLOW SUPERNERDS:
    Here I’ve posted the same set of concepts in three forms of prose:
    … 1) Publication Prose
    … 2) Academic Prose
    … 3) Academic Prose in Operational Language
    I recognize that I’m ‘asking a lot’ here, but please opine on which style would be preferable for the presentation of the summary of the work.

    Examples:

    1) Publication) Prose

    Title: The Emergence of Differences and Relations: A Constructive Logic of Existence

    From Homogeneity to Difference: In the beginning, there was homogeneity – a uniform, undifferentiated state of existence. However, as pressure or perturbations were introduced into this homogeneous system, differences began to emerge. These differences arose as localized fluctuations or variations in the properties or characteristics of the once-uniform existence.

    The Spectrum of Relations: As differences emerged, they gave rise to a spectrum of relations between the now-differentiated entities. These relations can range from “completely unrelated,” where the differences are merely coincidental and have no causal or dependent connection, to “necessary and persistent,” where the differences are intrinsically linked and interdependent.

    The Constructive Nature of Existence: Existence, then, can be understood as a constructive process, wherein differences and relations continuously emerge and evolve from an initially homogeneous state. This process of differentiation and relation-building gives rise to the complex tapestry of entities, phenomena, and interactions that constitute reality.

    Perception, Cognition, and Logic: The constructive nature of existence is mirrored in the functioning of the brain and the processes of perception, cognition, and logic. Neurons, the fundamental building blocks of the brain, operate by creating and manipulating differences and relations.

    Sensory inputs, which are essentially differences in stimuli, are processed by neurons to create perceptual representations. These representations are constructed through the identification and relation of differences in the input data.

    Cognition, in turn, involves the manipulation and integration of these perceptual representations to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models. This process relies on the ability of neurons to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic, then, can be understood as the systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. Logical reasoning involves assessing whether the relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions are consistent with each other and with the observed relations in reality.

    Artificial Neural Networks: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations, is also reflected in the design and functioning of artificial neural networks. These computational systems are modeled after the structure and operation of biological neurons, and they learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data.

    Just as neurons in the brain create perceptual and conceptual representations through the processing of differences and relations, artificial neural networks learn to recognize patterns, classify information, and make predictions by adjusting the strengths of the connections (relations) between their artificial neurons.

    Conclusion: The emergence of differences and relations from an initially homogeneous state is a fundamental process that underlies the constructive nature of existence. This process is mirrored in the functioning of the brain, the processes of perception, cognition, and logic, and even in the design and operation of artificial neural networks.

    2) Academic Prose
    Title: The Emergence of Differences and Relations: Towards a Constructive Logic of Existence

    Introduction: This section explores the fundamental process of how differences and relations emerge from an initially homogeneous state, and how this process explains the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and even artificial neural networks. By understanding these diverse phenomena as instances of a common constructive process, we aim to establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence.

    The Emergence of Differences: We begin with the concept of homogeneity, a uniform and undifferentiated state of existence. However, this homogeneity is unstable, and as perturbations or pressures are introduced, differences begin to emerge. These differences manifest as localized variations in the properties or characteristics of the once-uniform existence. The emergence of differences is a crucial first step in the constructive process, as it sets the stage for the formation of relations.

    The Formation of Relations: As differences emerge, they give rise to a spectrum of relations between the differentiated entities. At one end of the spectrum, we have “completely unrelated” differences, where the variations are merely coincidental and have no causal or dependent connection. At the other end, we find “necessary and persistent” relations, where the differences are intrinsically linked and interdependent. Between these extremes lies a continuum of relations with varying degrees of causal and dependent connections.

    The Constructive Process of Existence: Existence can be understood as a constructive process, continuously building upon the emergence of differences and the formation of relations. This ongoing process of differentiation and relation-building gives rise to the complex network of entities, phenomena, and interactions that constitute reality. The constructive nature of existence is not limited to the physical world but extends to the realms of perception, cognition, and logic.

    Neuronal Basis of Perception and Cognition: The brain, particularly the neuron, is a prime example of how the constructive process of differences and relations underlies perception and cognition. Neurons operate by creating and manipulating differences and relations in sensory inputs and mental representations. Sensory information, which consists of differences in stimuli, is processed by neurons to create perceptual representations through the identification and relation of these differences. Cognition, in turn, involves the manipulation and integration of perceptual representations to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models, relying on the ability of neurons to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic as the Testing of Relations: Logic can be understood as the systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. Logical reasoning involves assessing the consistency of relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions and their correspondence with observed relations in reality. By testing these relations, logic serves as a tool for validating the constructive processes of perception and cognition and ensuring their alignment with the constructive nature of existence.

    Artificial Neural Networks and the Constructive Process: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations, is also reflected in the design and functioning of artificial neural networks. These computational systems, modeled after biological neurons, learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data. Just as neurons in the brain create representations through the processing of differences and relations, artificial neural networks adjust the strengths of connections between artificial neurons to recognize patterns, classify information, and make predictions.

    Conclusion: The emergence of differences and relations from homogeneity is a fundamental constructive process that underpins the nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks. By recognizing these diverse phenomena as instances of a common constructive process, we can establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence. This constructive logic provides a framework for understanding how consistency and correspondence arise across different levels of reality, from the basic structure of existence to the highest forms of abstract reasoning.

    3) Academic Prose in Operational Language
    Title: Constructing a Logic of Existence: The Emergence of Differences and Relations

    Abstract: This section proposes a constructive logic of existence based on the fundamental process of the emergence of differences and relations from an initially homogeneous state. It argues that this process explains the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and even artificial neural networks. By demonstrating the commonality of this constructive process across these diverse phenomena, the paper aims to establish a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence.

    Introduction: The present investigation explores the fundamental constructive process that gives rise to the complex tapestry of entities, phenomena, and interactions constituting reality. It posits that this process involves the emergence of differences from an initially homogeneous state and the subsequent formation of relations between these differentiated entities. The paper argues that understanding this constructive process provides a basis for a unified constructive logic of existence, applicable across various domains, including perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks.

    The Emergence of Differences: The constructive process begins with a homogeneous state, characterized by uniformity and lack of differentiation. However, the introduction of perturbations or pressures destabilizes this homogeneity, leading to the emergence of localized variations in properties or characteristics. These variations constitute the emergence of differences, a crucial first step in the constructive process, as they provide the foundation for the formation of relations.

    The Formation of Relations: The emergence of differences necessitates the formation of relations between the differentiated entities. These relations exist on a spectrum, ranging from “completely unrelated” differences, where the variations lack causal or dependent connections, to “necessary and persistent” relations, characterized by intrinsic links and interdependence. Between these extremes, there exists a continuum of relations with varying degrees of causal and dependent connections. The formation of relations completes the constructive process, giving rise to the complex network of entities and interactions that constitute existence.

    Perception and Cognition as Constructive Processes: The constructive process of differences and relations finds expression in the functioning of the brain, particularly in the operations of neurons. Neurons engage in the creation and manipulation of differences and relations in sensory inputs and mental representations. The processing of sensory information, consisting of differences in stimuli, results in the creation of perceptual representations through the identification and relation of these differences. Cognition builds upon these perceptual representations, manipulating and integrating them to create higher-order concepts, ideas, and mental models. This process relies on the neuron’s ability to establish and modify relations between different perceptual and conceptual entities.

    Logic as the Testing of Relations: Logic operates as a systematic testing and validation of the consistency and correspondence between the relations established in perception, cognition, and the external world. The process of logical reasoning involves assessing the consistency of relations between concepts, ideas, or propositions and their correspondence with observed relations in reality. By testing these relations, logic serves as a tool for validating the constructive processes of perception and cognition, ensuring their alignment with the constructive nature of existence.

    Artificial Neural Networks and the Constructive Process: Artificial neural networks, designed to mimic the functioning of biological neurons, demonstrate the applicability of the constructive logic of existence in computational systems. These networks learn to perform tasks by identifying and manipulating differences and relations in input data. The adjustment of connection strengths between artificial neurons enables the recognition of patterns, classification of information, and generation of predictions. This process parallels the constructive process of differences and relations in the brain, showcasing the universality of the constructive logic across biological and artificial systems.

    Conclusion: The constructive logic of existence, based on the emergence of differences and relations from homogeneity, provides a unifying framework for understanding the constructive nature of existence, perception, cognition, logic, and artificial neural networks. By recognizing the commonality of this constructive process across these diverse phenomena, the paper establishes a foundation for a unified constructive logic of existence. This logic elucidates the emergence of consistency and correspondence across different levels of reality, from the fundamental structure of existence to the highest forms of abstract reasoning.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 14:49:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1766114009206374400