Category: Epistemology and Method

  • A sensory system and memory is required. Any equivalent

    A sensory system and memory is required. Any equivalent.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 09:30:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813506625136677237

    Reply addressees: @ian_wardell @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812442725439909995

  • How could you verify I’m conscious. Or how can I verify you are? It’s not diffic

    How could you verify I’m conscious. Or how can I verify you are? It’s not difficult if you try it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 00:12:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813366077428232403

    Reply addressees: @VogelfreiWeeb @1OriginalGod @RichardDawkins

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813307410364137647

  • It’s not a preference but a measure. In all my work I for decidability and full

    It’s not a preference but a measure. In all my work I for decidability and full accounting. This is the only expression of decidability and full accounting that is NOT preference. As such, yes he’s silly, no I’m not expressing a preference. And yes I could easily anticipate your…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-16 19:00:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813287611722833953

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813286965032415454

  • I know it, because I have worked on it since the eighties, and worse, I’ve falsi

    I know it, because I have worked on it since the eighties, and worse, I’ve falsified all the alternatives, I teach it, and I’ve worked in AI to demonstrate it. If you have detected some means by which the quantum background can transmit information by means we do not already know then you are talking nonsense. As far as we know, there is no means of information transmission, in the spectrum that we do not know of, and furthermore, since Consciousness is so simple and emergent then there is no necessity for doing so. If you have some argument published or available somewhere I will review it, but I do this for a living and it’s extremely unlikely you’ve discovered anything in the realm.

    Reply addressees: @1OriginalGod @RichardDawkins


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-16 18:02:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813272909093478400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813267028695748897

  • Yes, I am a legal scholar, as well as a philosopher, and behavioral and social s

    Yes, I am a legal scholar, as well as a philosopher, and behavioral and social scientist. I specialize in decidability which you would archaically refer to as ‘truth’, and the science of cooperation including law and economics. Though what I do is likely as incomprehensible to you as fundamental physics.

    Here is the explanation for a high school student. I’m afraid commonality concurrency and sovereignty are a bit of a reach for five year old’s.

    Though as usual, if you submit my prose to ChatGPT, since it understands my work, you can in fact ask it to explain it to an X year old. And it will do a fair enough job. 😉

    https://t.co/zY1yAYk8sT

    Reply addressees: @susalaesq @tribelaw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 16:07:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812881579489763328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812874188417348065

  • Oh. BTW: we worked on this today, and it’s the criteria for a truth claim. It re

    Oh. BTW: we worked on this today, and it’s the criteria for a truth claim. It requires some contemplation.

    We’ll finish the rest of the definitions at the bottom in the next few days. But they are by and large self explanatory.

    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1812644426142953908


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    McGilchrist has created a fictionalism (pseudoscience) to justify his christian fundamentalism.
    Instead, the origin of the two hemispheres is predator (left) prey (right) which should be obvious with less than ten seconds of thought.
    Nature cannot conceive, it can only solve incremental problems, and with bilateralism’s advantage in motion came the problem of synchronizing bilateralism, and solution to the bilateral brain produced the potential and demand for hemispheric dominance (priority) and as a consequence specialization. This resulted in the origin of all human differences sex, with the female (integrated and prey) bias, and the masculine (compartmentalized and predator) bias.
    You are welcome as is anyone else to watch my videos on the foundations on our YT channel to understand these matters.
    You are a good person, with moral ambitions, and you’re intellectually honest, so It’s worth my time to at least respond to you, but you should also try to recall that I’m probably one of only a handful of people on earth who understand these things at all levels of precision, and perhaps consider that just because I am kind in devoting my time to the public it does not mean it’s to be taken lightly. (Well, except when we’re all trash talking some nonsense or other as a break from the tedium and frustration of other bits of life. 😉 )
    -hugs

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1812647695464772003

  • (NLI CORE) THE CRITERIA FOR A TRUTH CLAIM Truth – In the Context of a Truth Clai

    (NLI CORE)
    THE CRITERIA FOR A TRUTH CLAIM
    Truth – In the Context of a Truth Claim, Truth consists of the promise of testimony of infallibility that has survived sufficient due diligence to promise the evasion of the imposition of involuntary costs upon any form of capital (demonstrated interest) from the temporal, to informational to normative, to institutional, to material, for the self or others. (promissory, performative, warrantied(due diligence), satisfying demand for infallibility that would impose involuntary costs upon the demonstrated interests of one’s self or others in the context in question.)
    Therefore Consisting of Demand for:
    – Infallibility – A decision upon which the resulting display word and deed impose no involuntary costs upon the demonstrated interests of one’s self or others in the context in question.
    – Decidability – Sufficient information exists, and no other information is required, such that alternatives are sufficiently improbable to impossible to satisfy the demand for infallibility in the context in question.
    Consisting of:
    – Truthfulness – Testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context in question (Tautological, Ideal, Logical, Testifiable, Demonstrated, Honest, Explanatory, Analogical.)
    Consisting of:
    – Testifiability – The limited list of dimensions to which humans are capable of testifying, and if satisfied, constitute the possibility of a truth claim.
    Consisting of Satisfying demand for:
    – – Realism – All existence consists of the persistence of constant relations between states of energy, independent of human perception, mind, belief, or preference, yet categorizable by human sense and perception, into entities(references, states, nouns), categories, processes(verbs), and consequences (state changes, nouns).
    – – Naturalism – All phenomena within existence have natural causes that can be observed, measured, described, understood as consistent and coherent with all other phenomena, and reduced to irreducible causes (first principles), using sense, perception, and logical and physical instrumentation.
    Consisting of Satisfying demand for:
    – – – Materialism (Persistence): Reality consists of physical or material entities that persist over time.
    – – – Determinism (Lawfulness): Existence operates according to consistent laws and regularities that can be discovered and described by science.
    – – – Reductionism (Reducibility): Complex phenomena can be explained by reducing them to their simpler, more fundamental components and processes.
    – – – Opportunism (Emergence): The interaction of simple elements can lead to the emergence of complex systems and opportunities for combination, recombination, innovation, adaptation, and evolution.
    – – – Scarcity (Constraint): All existence consists of limited availability of resources, which drives competition, adaptation, and evolution, influencing the behavior and interaction of organisms, shaping life and ecosystems through constraints.
    – – – Continuity (Consistency): There exists continuity between humans and the rest of the natural world, with all entities and phenomena being subject to the same natural laws and principles.
    AND
    Satisfying demand for:
    – – Identity – Categorically Consistent
    – – Logical – Internally Consistent
    – – Empirical – Externally Correspondent
    – – Possible – Operationally Possible
    – – Rational – Subjectively Rational (Bounded Rationality)
    – – Reciprocal – Reciprocally Subjectively Rational
    AND
    – – Fully accounted
    – – Within Stated Limits
    – – Within the limits of warrantability
    – – Within the limits of liability
    This is all it is possible for humans to testify to.
    If one cannot testify to these criteria then one cannot promise a truth claim.
    The reason this took millennia to solve was because it was, in fact, a very hard problem.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:24:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812644425874419712

  • It doesn’t make zero sense. It’s an example that this is a problem in every disc

    It doesn’t make zero sense. It’s an example that this is a problem in every discipline except those people within parenthesis who ‘cross borders’
    In the case there is no one on the jewish side it’s because there ISN”T anyone. This is important also because it…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-13 22:16:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812249813712576856

    Reply addressees: @Logos_Elect @mythril_bot @NatLawInstitute @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812247964129116483

  • @Mythril_bot It doesn’t make zero sense. It’s an example that this is a problem

    @Mythril_bot
    It doesn’t make zero sense. It’s an example that this is a problem in every discipline except those people within parenthesis who ‘cross borders’
    In the case there is no one on the jewish side it’s because there ISN”T anyone. This is important also because it illustrates what our different elites specialize in.
    Please ask questions and dnot make assertions. We can almost always explain.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-13 22:16:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812249813645512704

  • I always engage in good faith. However, the only reason to engage with others is

    I always engage in good faith. However, the only reason to engage with others is to produce answers that are shared with the broader audience. In other words, if you don’t want it shared, don’t say it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-12 01:32:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811574266120278232

    Reply addressees: @Draconaissance

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811571896405885269