Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Max (all) Double down on “stress” (a) wealth is the result of the amount of capi

    Max (all)
    Double down on “stress”

    (a) wealth is the result of the amount of capital you can bear responsibility for.
    (b) you gain responsibility because people give it to you.
    (c) people give responsibility to you because they think you can do something with it they can’t do as well themselves.
    (d) The more you are responsible for the more risks you have to mitigate from other people who are as equally competitive because they are equally responsible, and equally trusted.
    (e) The more risks from the more people you have to mitigate in competition with people who are equlally responsible, competitive, and mitigating,
    (f) the trade off is that the quality of opportunities for you to gain responsibility for, mitigate, and profit from, increases, so that you have inverted the supply demand curve facing all people who want to gain wealth. And the quality of people you deal with are more responsible themselves, more capable themselves, and mitigate more effectively themselves.
    (g) And eventually you run into the problem of seeking returns that are no longer from holes in the market unserved by people with more wealth than you have, but competing for commodity opportunities that require vast wealth even to participate in, and which are subject to political risk.
    (h) meanwhile all wealth is subject to entropy (depreciation).
    (i) So every step in that process increases stress.

    I don’t think it’s possible for the average person to comprehend how hard people work who have a great deal of money, nor the condition of stress they are under the entire time. Nor how prescious any time away from that stress is. Nor how impossible it is to escape it at all. You must treat every person you interact with as wanting something from you. You can only really trust a few close people. And a yacht for example is a reprieve, and worth every cent – simply because people can’t get to you. 😉

    I know myself, running companes across north america and europe, and with customers worldwide, that I can outwork most people. But there are people who can outwork me, and people for whom outworking me is simply much easier, and less stressful. You must process information and make decisions and judge people constantly.

    In other words, just as there are sports athletes there are social athletes, work athletes, and intellectual athletes. And most of us understand that atletics of each kind combines some kind of strength with one thing: endurance that is unberable and unimaginable by the majority.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @themaxstoic


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679500243765788672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679493486070976514

  • Clarification. Last paragraph: –“In other words, we make the economy better by

    Clarification. Last paragraph:
    –“In other words, we make the economy better by ending bads and then indirectly produce goods, rather than try to produce goods that always and everywhere produce bads indirectly.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:01:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679491131221102598

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679488171317293056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    TAXES DON’T SOLVE INEQUALITY. HOW TO FIX IT?
    No you cannot reduce inequality with taxes.
    You can:
    Structure your economy for employment (instead of prices) -reducing need for taxes and redistribution.
    Compensate for market failure by producing a labor economy for the production of commons – reducing need for taxes and redistribution: note that this demand is going to increase rapidly as technology continues to increase.
    Require work for redistribution – producing returns on redistribution.
    Increase employability of citizens within their ability limits – reducing need for taxes and redistribution.
    Eradicate rent seeking, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, and corruption – reducing need for taxes.
    Limit utility, bureacracy, state, and education ‘income capture’, in particularly prohibiting unions – reducing need for taxes.
    Convert consumer interest, insurance, employment, medical, and retirement savings to non-profits under the treasury, invest those ‘institutional investments’ in the economy – reducing need for taxes.
    Convert the Academy and Medical industries to professional-run, and end all administrative personnel who consume the majority of costs.
    Restore ability to hire by tests of IQ and personality thereby ending the need for 100k education debt as a substitute.
    Reduce education over 13 to part time and begin part time employment for the young. Socialization and economic education are more important than indoctrination.
    Improve education by replacing instruction with ‘gaming’.
    Continue govt funding of research but structure as public private, keeping part of the profits of R&D in the treasury reducing neede for taxes.
    Form public-private businesses for the provision of utilities (most of which would include telco, video, data, cell, and run them as non-profits.).
    End the immigration problem that seeks to keep wages low, at the expense of social destruction (bowling alone). And restore requirement for full integration before admission.

    And I can continue this list for pages and pages.

    In other words, we make the economy better by ending bads that indirectly produce goods, rather than try to produce goods that always and everywhere produce bads by externality.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1679488171317293056

  • Clarification. Last paragraph: –“In other words, we make the economy better by

    Clarification. Last paragraph:
    –“In other words, we make the economy better by ending bads and then indirectly produce goods, rather than try to produce goods that always and everywhere produce bads indirectly.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:01:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679491131124617217

  • TAXES DON’T SOLVE INEQUALITY. HOW TO FIX IT? No you cannot reduce inequality wit

    TAXES DON’T SOLVE INEQUALITY. HOW TO FIX IT?
    No you cannot reduce inequality with taxes.
    You can:
    Structure your economy for employment (instead of prices) -reducing need for taxes and redistribution.
    Compensate for market failure by producing a labor economy for the production of commons – reducing need for taxes and redistribution: note that this demand is going to increase rapidly as technology continues to increase.
    Require work for redistribution – producing returns on redistribution.
    Increase employability of citizens within their ability limits – reducing need for taxes and redistribution.
    Eradicate rent seeking, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, and corruption – reducing need for taxes.
    Limit utility, bureacracy, state, and education ‘income capture’, in particularly prohibiting unions – reducing need for taxes.
    Convert consumer interest, insurance, employment, medical, and retirement savings to non-profits under the treasury, invest those ‘institutional investments’ in the economy – reducing need for taxes.
    Convert the Academy and Medical industries to professional-run, and end all administrative personnel who consume the majority of costs.
    Restore ability to hire by tests of IQ and personality thereby ending the need for 100k education debt as a substitute.
    Reduce education over 13 to part time and begin part time employment for the young. Socialization and economic education are more important than indoctrination.
    Improve education by replacing instruction with ‘gaming’.
    Continue govt funding of research but structure as public private, keeping part of the profits of R&D in the treasury reducing neede for taxes.
    Form public-private businesses for the provision of utilities (most of which would include telco, video, data, cell, and run them as non-profits.).
    End the immigration problem that seeks to keep wages low, at the expense of social destruction (bowling alone). And restore requirement for full integration before admission.

    And I can continue this list for pages and pages.

    In other words, we make the economy better by ending bads that indirectly produce goods, rather than try to produce goods that always and everywhere produce bads by externality.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 13:49:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679488171162193920

  • Much more complex. Sort of like how germany needed russian gas, and much of the

    Much more complex. Sort of like how germany needed russian gas, and much of the world needs ukrainian grain. Except lower productivity much poorer economy and far more fragile interdependencies. But we have to think more in terms of the bronze age collapse, and how civilizations reorganized and reproduced evolutionary velocity after 800bc, very much like we have recovered from the dark ages after 1200ad.

    Reply addressees: @BlakeAn77455669


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 03:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677884597651079170

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677883144928739330

  • The counter to anti-fiat arguments, is that there is no reason one has the right

    The counter to anti-fiat arguments, is that there is no reason one has the right to preservation of the purchasing power of any asset including money, when instead value can be parked in any number of assets not constantly diluted by inflation of the money supply.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-06 19:50:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677042459447279616

    Reply addressees: @andyinsdca @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_faraharif

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677039168856420352

  • Technically speaking the function of fiat currency is to prevent the financial s

    Technically speaking the function of fiat currency is to prevent the financial sector from seeking interest as rents, with profits obtained by non-contribution to production.

    Worse it’s not clear that once we have fiat currency and borrow from our own collective future rather…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-06 19:48:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677041802472292352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677039168856420352

  • “Q: Do you see the tax dollars spent on a war and then on reconstruction after a

    “Q: Do you see the tax dollars spent on a war and then on reconstruction after as an example?”

    As I’ve said to libertarians for a few decades now, much to their disapproval, war is just another business and political operation that is the ultimate form of entrepreneurship, and it is either profitable or not. If it’s profitable, it’s usually VERY profitable. If it’s not, then it’s usually very NOT profitable. 😉

    It is very hard to make a case against conducting and winning a war. And yes, most beneficial reorganization and increase in investment occurs after wars, because *wars disrupt the existing set of networks of economic dependence* giving rise to new possible networks that would not have been possible without the opportunity for reorganization.

    This comes of as ‘war is good’. When the answer is Machiavelli’s: war is a business like any other not moral question and moral questions must be left out of war whether defensive or offensive, lest you fail for having done so.

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_faraharif


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-06 19:27:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677036595415855105

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677005165344493569

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_f

    RT @curtdoolittle: @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_faraharif “Q: What are primary methods of financial extracti…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-06 19:22:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677035327951716355

  • “Q: What are primary methods of financial extraction? I’m guessing taxes and int

    “Q: What are primary methods of financial extraction? I’m guessing taxes and interest.”

    Usury, Baiting Into Hazard, Market Manipulation, Rent Seeking are the private sector means of financial extraction through abuse of our existing laws.

    We can add of course, all the simple forms of baiting into hazard other than financial: Alcohol, Drugs, Porn etc, Prostitution, ( Marriage 😉 ) Gambling, and various forms of Scams and Fraud.

    CATEGORIES OF FINANCIAL EXTRACTION
    Taxes,
    … Interest,
    … … Usury (Predatory Lending)
    … … … Baiting into Hazard (Seduction)
    … … … … Market Manipulation
    … … … … … Rent Seeking (Capture)
    … … … … … … Bribes,
    … … … … … … … Corruption
    … … … … … … … … Proceduralism
    … … … … … … … … … Lawfare
    … … … … … … … … … … Displacements (takeovers)
    … … … … … … … … … … … Takings (seizure)
    … … … … … … … … … … … … War

    Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_faraharif


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-06 19:22:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677035301519196166

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677005165344493569