Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Q: “Curt: What international banks do you recommend?”– My favorite internationa

    –Q: “Curt: What international banks do you recommend?”–

    My favorite international bank is HSBC(Hong Kong/London). Great service. Great access. Everything works like clockwork. 😉
    My favorite private bank is Schwab(USA) but they’ve been acquired and their balance sheet was fuzzy, but I see it’s improved.
    My favorite personal bank is Swiss and I won’t name it, but all small Swiss banks are about the same if you give them at least 500k USD.
    I don’t use Panamanian or “Island” banks because I have no need to engage in hiding assets, but I’m quite knowledgeable of how to do so and have helped quite a few people do so – though it’s so much easier than just ten years ago it doesn’t require special knowledge or skill.
    My favorite consumer bank in North America is TDBank (Canada). They have the best customer service by far.
    My favorite Eastern European bank Raiffeisen Bank Aval (Austria) has been troubled by the UA/RU conflict but despite the bureaucratic procedures, they manage to get your international banking done.
    I used to use both Ukrainian (PrivatBank) and Russian (Alfa-Bank) banks, and in particular I enjoyed great customer service from PrivatBank.
    I have a particular aversion to keeping capital in the large American banks because whey they are highly stable, they are arms of the state, and the government has demonstrated third-world irresponsibility by denying juridical defense in financial matters, with president Obama doing some of the worst prosecutions of innocent financial transactions in history, and stressing non-US banks to help him.
    As for private banking (wealthy folk) I had bad experiences with one the big fellows I won’t name. Why? There is a sort of middle-weight trap in private banking where you have enough to be a customer, but not enough to matter enough so to speak. 😉 So for example my ability to ‘influence’ large banks as a CEO of a large corporation was not the same as an individual.
    Why these differences? The customer service differs based on what kind of business you’re in. And I was involved in many ‘complexities’ between the different businesses, countries, and especially when it came to intelligence work.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-08 18:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688981556386279424

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @DK_Aggie_95 @SethDillon Quite the opposite. Since cooperatio

    RT @curtdoolittle: @DK_Aggie_95 @SethDillon Quite the opposite. Since cooperation is always disproportionately productive (Beneficial), and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-07 19:17:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688630431179042816

  • And what value are those allies in other than maintaining that world trade that

    And what value are those allies in other than maintaining that world trade that benefits everyone else at the expense of the american worker?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-06 14:36:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688197427709321216

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688196322363428865

  • Most important video on economics of the year so far: Why we need to end globali

    Most important video on economics of the year so far:
    Why we need to end globalization and benefit the USA and particularly the middle class. Note that our recommended reforms include these reforms. And our solutions are a bit more aggressive.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWk-5TvzQSU


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-06 14:22:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688193712860336128

  • Most important video on economics of the year so far: Why we need to end globali

    Most important video on economics of the year so far:
    Why we need to end globalization and benefit the USA and particularly the middle class. Note that our recommended reforms include these reforms. And our solutions are a bit more aggressive.

    https://t.co/dhacZ9amlR


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-06 14:22:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1688193712768049152

  • RT @INArteCarloDoss: It’s increasingly obvious that this bull market bubble is n

    RT @INArteCarloDoss: It’s increasingly obvious that this bull market bubble is not so much about all the spurious narratives flying around…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-04 14:04:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687464579788349440

  • That’s a mistake. It’s the absence of prohibitons on labor arbitrage at the cost

    That’s a mistake. It’s the absence of prohibitons on labor arbitrage at the cost of employment causing internal asymmetry of rewards (which may require some explanation if you aren’t educated in economics.)

    Unions are one thing. Coercieve unions are yet another. Coercive unions that apply political pressure under democratic participation are even worse. Export of production means export of labor, means elimination of the power of unions, union corruption, and state use of coercion as a result.

    That’s a simple example of the absence or rule of law (of natural law) and what we call ‘full accounting’. The result of rule of law of natural law under full accounting is just ‘moral capitalism’.

    This is a relatively simple problem to fix. But creating ideological positions under democratic competition merely exacerbates the ignorance of the population by converting a practical institutional practice of maintaining rule of law of the natural law, as we do in many other aspects of life, to a moral, and then ideological and then divisive means of divide and conquer.

    Reply addressees: @liberaequa @EPoe187


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-04 13:10:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687451060833546240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687421400712110080

  • If I may ask one more question? Ok. Let’s assume the data is not improved; it’s

    If I may ask one more question?
    Ok. Let’s assume the data is not improved; it’s just been redesigned to look good. And let’s assume that the problem of data-lag confronting central banks hasn’t improved.
    But (and we’re both old enough to remember this), in previous contractions, wasn’t there was less awareness and concern spread across the economy, and more optimism?
    So isn’t there a decrease in the ‘animal spirits’ that cause rapid shifts that cause shocks that spiral?
    I was conscious of the 80s banking crisis, the early 90s recession, of the 2001 obvious problem of malinvestment, and of the 2008 obvious debt problems. All of these events were roughly predictable and obvious, but optimism and wishful thinking seemed to persist in the broader population. I don’t really see that right now.
    We know that in general the more aware people are of a risk the more likely they are to counter it assuming the incentive isn’t overwhelming – this is one of the reasons some predictions don’t manifest.
    So do you observe this same behavior or, at least from your vantage point, do you see ‘same old, same old once again’?

    Reply addressees: @VelenskiMeir


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-01 19:16:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686455874347221002

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686441575021207552

  • RT @VelenskiMeir: @curtdoolittle The data is mixed, correct. The data is reflect

    RT @VelenskiMeir: @curtdoolittle The data is mixed, correct. The data is reflecting and leaning towards a soft landing , however I can see…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-01 18:28:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686443708177059840

  • Dear Driving Markets (@VelenskiMeir) Re: Your video from today. 1) Data seems to

    Dear Driving Markets (@VelenskiMeir)
    Re: Your video from today.

    1) Data seems to be mixed, and the financial and biz sectors are signaling a softening of risk. Is there any merit to the suggestion that we might see a soft landing? Or is this wishful thinking once again? (I’m not paying close enough attention at the moment so I’m unsure.)

    2) Working hypothesis is that improvements in data collection and analysis plus the ‘kick in the pants’ produced by 2008-10, and fear that we are running out of options, compounded by geostrategic uncertainty created greater diligence across the board so that we (all sectors) are collectively responding sufficiently to soften animal spirits.

    Would love your thoughts on both questions. 😉
    Thanks for the work you do.
    You’ve added a welcome voice to the daily discussion.
    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-01 15:07:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686393254265384960