Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • READ Changing concepts of money

    http://jpkoning.blogspot.com/2013/09/separating-functions-of-moneythe-case.htmlGOOD READ

    Changing concepts of money.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-13 14:47:00 UTC

  • JOBLESSNESS AND IPHONES πŸ™‚

    JOBLESSNESS AND IPHONES πŸ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-13 09:11:00 UTC

  • IS OVER New book from Cowen

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/0525953736/ref=tsm_1_fb_lkAVERAGE IS OVER

    New book from Cowen


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-12 15:39:00 UTC

  • IS SPAIN (AND THE REST OF THE WORLD) CORRUPT? – THE EVIDENCE This is a fairly ho

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2009/03/why_is_spain_so_corruptWHY IS SPAIN (AND THE REST OF THE WORLD) CORRUPT? – THE EVIDENCE

    This is a fairly hot topic in political economy. But I think Norberg is correct, and the critic GinΓ© that argues that it’s structural, is himself, falling for the mistake that he himself cautions against.

    From what we can tell, corruption is the NORM in the world. Universalism is unique to northern Europe. It is present ONLY in germanic countries with universal militia participation, the nuclear family, individual property rights, extensive outbreeding, and prohibitions on cousin marriage.

    The last being the problem with most of the world. Small homogenous countries that are highly interrelated because of a prohibition on cousin marriage, and who have universal private property rights, where the nuclear family is the unit of reproductive and economic production, lack corruption – and those that are diverse, pluralistic, and inbred treat family, clan, and tribe as the unit of economic and reproductive production.

    It’s pretty simple economics and incentives when you understand what’s going on.

    Now you won’t like it if you carry the logic through much farther. Because it explains a bit more about birth rate problems. Single motherhood and extensive participation of women in the work force is only possible for two or three generations. The Romans couldn’t change it and neither can we. Competitive reproduction punishes folly.

    The fact is that spain has corruption in government, and structural corruption in government, because of its historical values. These values are called ‘ catholic’ and catholic countries share it. But it’s not because they’re catholic. It’s because these countries REMAINED catholic, because they remained with with strong, paternal extended family structures, and the authoritarianism and extended familism that .

    Cultures develop formal institutions to INSTITUTIONALIZE their informal institutions. States mirror moral codes. And moral codes mirror family structures. And family structures mirror the reproductive strategy that mirrors the necessary structure of economic production. (If you can follow that entire chain of events.)

    This is expressly counter to the democratic equalitarian, egalitarian, universalist, postmodern mythos that democratic states run on and obtain their legitimacy from.

    So, The Spanish may be corrupt. But the fact is, that there will always be SPANISH people. We can’t say the same for northern Europeans. There aren’t enough european countries bast the 12% mark, where subcultures under democracy seek political power and divisiveness that they could not obtain under monarchy, which denies people access to disruptive political power.

    See Edward Banfield’s “The Moral Basis of a Backward Society”. Which started this discussion many years ago. See _Trust_ by Fukuyama who has tried to popularize the problem. See Emmanuel Todd’s _Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems_ . See Macfarlane: The Origins of English Individualism

    Also of related interest:

    Ricardo Duchesne: The Uniqueness of Western Civilization

    Huntington: Culture Matters

    Acemoglu: Why Nations Fail

    Fukuyama: The Origins Of Political Order

    But a word of caution, is that this topic is a third rail. And if you pursue it you’ll be demonized for it. πŸ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-09 08:45:00 UTC

  • (IRONIC HUMOR) PROPERTY RIGHTS AND TAXES AS LOANS The exchange of free riding, f

    (IRONIC HUMOR) PROPERTY RIGHTS AND TAXES AS LOANS

    The exchange of free riding, fraud, theft and violence for property rights functions as an involuntary loan of the opportunity to consume by way of free riding, fraud, theft and violence, on the unproductive. In exchange for which, at some later time, they receive the service of less toil, lower prices and greater variation, and freedom from slavery.

    Under democracy, the unproductive tax the income of the productive, so that the unproductive receive the same benefit as if they were productive.

    The problem is that the productive need the unproductive to have money to spend, in order to maintain momentum (velocity) in the economy, from which the productive benefit.

    So as long as the tax money of the productive is given to consumers, and not the government, and not to competing social interests, it’s a necessary and reasonable exchange of value – instead of a forced loan of free riding, fraud, theft and violence from the unproductive for the purpose of consumption, it’s a forced loan from the productive to the consumer.

    Now, if the productive could SAVE enough that when they got off the hamster wheel of velocity, that they could maintain their standard of living, I kind of think that this system works in a sort of madcap kind of way. I don’t like it very much. Because the hamster wheel is really risky for entrepreneurs. And I don’t want to suppress the lottery effect. that drives innovation under capitalism. But it might be possible to solve the problem of rewarding entrepreneurship differently from investment and lending.

    I think, if I work a little bit more at this I can explain it all in moral language that average ‘folk’ can understand. ‘Cause the language of man is morality not empiricism.

    The world we have made is a hysterically funny place.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-09-01 05:18:00 UTC

  • WHY NOT BASIC ECONOMICS IN THE CORE? (Re-posted from elsewhere) You know, math a

    WHY NOT BASIC ECONOMICS IN THE CORE?

    (Re-posted from elsewhere)

    You know, math and economics can be taught as very simple stories. As narratives. Why you can get out of school reading Chaucer, but not knowing how to balance a checkbook, the power of compound interest, the basic currency system, and simple macro economics, is just …. completely beyond me. It’s like, they want us to be ignorant. (And no. I don’t mean that. I’m not a conspiracy nut. I just think it’s ideological not practical.) This stuff isn’t magic. The narrative doesn’t even require algebra. You can draw it as pictures without numbers. We’re all slaves to this system and all but a few of us are ignorant of it.

    It’s freaking criminal.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-08-29 13:51:00 UTC

  • BROOKINGS GETS ON BOARD. Told ya so. Economics is largely demographics

    http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/08/the-nation-will-need-another-7%c2%bd-to-8-years-to-restore-full-employment/Oooh!

    BROOKINGS GETS ON BOARD.

    Told ya so. Economics is largely demographics.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-08-28 14:02:00 UTC

  • THE ECONOMIC RED QUEEN?

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0393239357/ref=mw_dp_mdsc?dsc=1&qid=1377611476&sr=8-1TECHNOLOGY: THE ECONOMIC RED QUEEN?


    Source date (UTC): 2013-08-28 13:56:00 UTC

  • ECONOMIC HUMOR What do bookstores and brothels have in common? Replacement of th

    http://bloom.bg/183xmjH(Adult). ECONOMIC HUMOR

    What do bookstores and brothels have in common? Replacement of the brick and mortar as a distribution channel. πŸ™‚

    Humans are fascinating creatures. πŸ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2013-08-28 13:51:00 UTC

  • MOVEMENT IN ECONOMICS. Krugman continues his shift. An finally the mainstream be

    http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2013/08/the-real-trouble-with-economics-sociology.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2FKupd+%28Economist%27s+View%29IMPORTANT MOVEMENT IN ECONOMICS.

    Krugman continues his shift. An finally the mainstream begins to agree with people like me. πŸ˜‰

    The few. The futile.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-08-28 04:35:00 UTC