Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Indirectly yes. 1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion. 2

    Indirectly yes.
    1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion.
    2. And the central banks do have some idea of the amount of money created through credit expansion.
    When I discuss these matters I just throw the entire bucket into the fed, because in the end, that’s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:59:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714431052003885302

    Reply addressees: @shity_paradigm @MinClaydough @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714427833689506273

  • Indirectly yes. 1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion. 2

    Indirectly yes.
    1. central banks and the treasury facilitate credit expansion.
    2. And the central banks do have some idea of the amount of money created through credit expansion.
    When I discuss these matters I just throw the entire bucket into the fed, because in the end, that’s who is both producing, recording, and most importantly insuring the new credit money.

    BELOW

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates
    4. Credit Expansion explained

    3. How Credit Expansion Operates. When banks expand credit by issuing new loans, they effectively increase the money supply. This is a fundamental concept in fractional-reserve banking, where banks are required to hold only a fraction of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out. When a bank makes a new loan, it credits the borrower’s account, thereby creating new money. This new money is a liability on the bank’s balance sheet but an asset for the borrower, who can spend it, thus increasing the active money supply.

    Here’s how it works in more detail:

    Fractional-Reserve System: Banks are required to hold a certain percentage (the reserve ratio) of their deposits in reserve. The rest can be loaned out.

    Loan Issuance: When a bank issues a loan, it credits the borrower’s account with the loan amount. This is new money that didn’t exist before.

    Money Multiplier Effect: The borrower spends the loan by transferring it to other accounts (e.g., buying a car, investing in a business, etc.). The recipients of that money may then deposit it into their own bank accounts, and the process continues, further expanding the money supply.

    Ledger & Accounting: Each loan and deposit is carefully recorded by the banks.

    Banks are generally required to report various statistics, including loan data, to the central bank. The specifics of what needs to be reported and how often can vary by jurisdiction. This data can be essential for the central bank’s monetary policy decisions. However, it’s worth noting that while the central bank can track the credit created by the banking system, this system is not perfect, and there is often a time lag between when credit is created and when it gets reported and analyzed.
    (which is why the fed is always ‘late’.)

    AND:

    4. Credit expansion refers to an increase in the availability of loans or the creation of new credit by financial institutions, typically banks. This usually occurs in response to a more accommodative monetary policy by a central bank, which lowers interest rates and eases reserve requirements. The fundamental aim is to stimulate economic activity by making borrowing cheaper and more accessible for both individuals and businesses.

    Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:

    Monetary Policy Shift: A central bank lowers interest rates and may also reduce reserve requirements for commercial banks. This action increases the amount of money that banks have at their disposal to lend.

    Increased Lending: Due to reduced interest rates and lower reserve requirements, commercial banks can now offer more loans and at more favorable terms. This incentivizes borrowing.

    Consumer Spending and Investment: As loans become cheaper and easier to obtain, consumers are more likely to borrow money for spending on goods, services, and investments. Businesses also take advantage of the lower borrowing costs to invest in expansion and development.

    Economic Stimulus: The increased borrowing and subsequent spending generally lead to higher economic activity. This is often measured in terms of growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Potential Risks: While credit expansion can stimulate economic growth, it can also lead to higher levels of debt and can potentially inflate asset bubbles. If the rates of borrowing outstrip the rates of repayment or productive investment, the economy could become unstable.

    Inflationary Pressure: An increase in the money supply through credit expansion can also lead to inflation, as more money chases the same amount of goods and services.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:59:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714431051626328064

  • I am betting against y’all in that regard, because I am 100% certain that when f

    I am betting against y’all in that regard, because I am 100% certain that when fedcoin comes out, they are going to offer to trade fedcoin for crypto for something like 30 days, and then prosecute it like it’s cocaine trafficing and outlaw crypto. (Especially given that a russian crypto exchange was used to get the money from iran to Hamas). If it wasn’t for institutional support at the moment it’d already be dead. But there is a very small chance that I”ll be wrong.

    Reply addressees: @MinClaydough @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:49:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714428337072799744

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714414858412708032

  • The velocity of money is due to the confidence the people have in their futures,

    The velocity of money is due to the confidence the people have in their futures, and the confidence of business, industry, and finance in risking on research, investment capitalization, production, distribution and sales that eventually end up in the hands of other businesses and consumers.
    The greatest systemic restraint to this process is the availability of money to do so at a price that accomodates the risk and the production distribution and sale cycle extends with increasingly complex networks of production – especialy those that involve the i-pencil problem.

    I suspect you like 99% of folks with some libertarian economic background haven’t made the transition from thiking in terms of money and assets to thinking in terms of time -becuase all assests, and all asset substitutes (money) are just stores of time. That is why they are variable. Becuase the value of time to ech person at every moment differes. Thankfully it averages out so prices are stable enough for price imputation and therefore risk calculation by invsetors and entrepreneurs.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 23:00:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714416076237271040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714386798212685995

  • Um. I don’t think you have that quite right. The velocity of money is the gdp in

    Um. I don’t think you have that quite right. The velocity of money is the gdp in time period over the money supply. So what yu’re implying is that if the money supply is increased then the velocity goes down. But that’s only true of the supply of money is not limiting the production of gdp – which it does. And so does interest. Especially consumer interest – for which tehre is no logical utility. The value of interest lies in the bringing forward of production in time, in competition with other attempts to bring forward producction in time. For the people, if they’re borrowing from themselves that’s already accounted for by their consumption.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:54:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714414488923889664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714387745496265131

  • If you were involved at all in heterodox econ (ie: variations on austrian) then

    If you were involved at all in heterodox econ (ie: variations on austrian) then all of this has been an obvious train wreck for a century or more.

    The problem is that the austrians (and other heterodox) didn’t know how to solve it. We probably do now. But it requires restructuring government’s relationship to the treasury, and changing govt from a purely revenue (extraction) entity to more mirror the monarchies as trying to make the state make money so that it needn’t interfere with the people and there economy as much as they do now – now that the false promise of endless growth has been gutted like a bull moose with a dull flint knife.

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @JeffSnider_AIP


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:47:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714412875974942720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714398901212496054

  • No. It’s a forcible redistribution to the public by discounting the market value

    No. It’s a forcible redistribution to the public by discounting the market value of a property. To engagen in rent seeking one must obtain a profit without contribution to production, and to do so directly or indirectly by taking advantage of some set of institutions.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 22:40:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714411212165767533

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714406145446805692

  • One of the first principles of economics, that is a given in physics, is a full

    One of the first principles of economics, that is a given in physics, is a full accounting (balance sheet) of causes and consequences. Not a selection bias. If zombie companies are destroying private wealth and others wish to make short term profits by financing their decline, or gambling on their recovery (which is what they do), then that is a private matter. People do so because it’s in their interest to maximize their personal returns as an organization vs the alternatives. Just as you may defer maintenance on yourself, relationships, assets, and home.

    However, when rents are extended to the public, and impose a cost on the commons, that’s a public matter.

    I am not sure why this is hard to comprehend but it is possible that I’ve been doing this so long that I’m not seeing what you’re intuiting.

    My suspicion is that you are accidentally dealing with an ideal or moral idea and not a concrete category – possibly because this is one of the cataegorical deceptions in libertarian thought, just like the categorical deception of ‘society’ in Marx’s work. This mistake is common for most people – because tehy do not realize they are merely justifying a moral presumption – though I havent detected this line of thinking in you before.

    It’s a Very Jewish > Christian-Theological > Philosophical-Moral > Rationalistic Justification > but not necessarily empirical > and certainly scientific, and therefore fully accounted.

    HIERARCHY OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS: Personal (life, body, actions) > Private (self or familial regulation, usus, fructus, mancipio, abusus) > Semi-Private (private regulation, usus, fructus, mancipio) > Semi-Plublic Commons (self regulating, usus + fructus) > Public Commons (usable, usus) > Public ‘sacred’ Commons (inviolable).

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 17:36:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714334596081340416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714329125886845358

  • Canonical Response (not necessarily so) The comparison between economic growth u

    Canonical Response (not necessarily so)

    The comparison between economic growth under the gold standard and under a fiat money system is a complex issue that doesn’t lend itself to straightforward answers. A multitude of variables, including technology advancements, global trade dynamics, population growth, political stability, and fiscal policies, contribute to economic growth rates, making it challenging to attribute changes to the monetary system alone.

    However, some broad observations can be made:

    Time Periods: The gold standard was in widespread use during a period that was quite different from today, both technologically and socially. Therefore, comparing growth rates across such different eras can be misleading.

    Stability vs. Flexibility: The gold standard is often praised for its stability and its ability to limit government spending, potentially leading to more responsible fiscal policies. However, it lacks the flexibility that a fiat system provides, especially the ability to adjust monetary policy during economic downturns.

    Deflation and Inflation: Under the gold standard, deflation was more common, which could slow down economic growth by increasing the real burden of debt and encouraging hoarding of money. Fiat systems allow for more control over inflation rates, which can be adjusted to theoretically promote spending and investment, thereby potentially stimulating growth.

    Financial Crises: The gold standard is often criticized for exacerbating financial crises because it restricts the ability of governments to adjust monetary policy.

    Global Trade: The gold standard can constrain international trade as nations can run out of gold reserves, which is not an issue in a fiat system.

    Empirical Studies: Some empirical studies suggest that growth was lower and recessions were more frequent under the gold standard, but these findings are subject to a variety of interpretations and are not universally accepted.

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:37:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714319723540721664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714317594142941582

  • Chicken Egg. A gold standard constrains growth particularly in competition with

    Chicken Egg. A gold standard constrains growth particularly in competition with others. FUrther more it provides rent seeking opportunities to currency producers and holders.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:20:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714315433371680977

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @neoCamelist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714313488296812689