The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter)
The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT)
The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k.
The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day….
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter) The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT) The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k. The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day…. -
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter)
The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT)
The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k.
The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day….
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 14:34:00 UTC
-
Consensus Produces Monopolies And Monopolies Fail To Serve Market Demands
(important) We all need mindfulness in a method available to us. We all need a strategy using methods and resources available to us. We all need myths(narratives), ideologies (propaganda), philosophies(methods of reasoning), and sciences(methods of measurements) with which to decide how to act to pursue that strategy. The reason being we marginally indifferent enough to communicate within limits and cooperate within limits. But we are marginally different in our genetic, social, economic, physical, intellectual, and emotional abilities. Different enough to require different mindfulness, strategies, and means of surviving, prospering, and enjoying. So we are left with the problem of cooperating on means, despite different ends, and despite different genetic, social, economic, physical intellectual, and emotional abilities. And the only way to do so is markets of voluntary reciprocity at every scale from association to production to reproduction to commons to polities to nations. And the only way to facilitate that is multiple economies slave(prisoner), serf(laborer), freeman(craftsman), citizen(managerial), sovereign(executive). Because the slave needs direction, the serf security, the craftsman opportunity, the citizen liberty, and the sovereign institutions. And our folly has been the post enlightenment effort to produce a monopoly economy instead of a monopoly rule of law and a market for economies given the various needs and abilities. We instinctually pursue consensus and numbers beyond the scale of their utility the same way we extend our perception of ethics, economics, and physics beyond the scale of human perception, and to the point of their failure. The maximum value of consensus is the law of reciprocity. Beyond that the maximum value of any given consensus is that which can be achieved by reciprocity. This is the lesson of the past two centuries. Tripartism was a western practice because like all else in western civilization it was an empirical observation of existential reality – not a comforting lie. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine. -
Consensus Produces Monopolies And Monopolies Fail To Serve Market Demands
(important) We all need mindfulness in a method available to us. We all need a strategy using methods and resources available to us. We all need myths(narratives), ideologies (propaganda), philosophies(methods of reasoning), and sciences(methods of measurements) with which to decide how to act to pursue that strategy. The reason being we marginally indifferent enough to communicate within limits and cooperate within limits. But we are marginally different in our genetic, social, economic, physical, intellectual, and emotional abilities. Different enough to require different mindfulness, strategies, and means of surviving, prospering, and enjoying. So we are left with the problem of cooperating on means, despite different ends, and despite different genetic, social, economic, physical intellectual, and emotional abilities. And the only way to do so is markets of voluntary reciprocity at every scale from association to production to reproduction to commons to polities to nations. And the only way to facilitate that is multiple economies slave(prisoner), serf(laborer), freeman(craftsman), citizen(managerial), sovereign(executive). Because the slave needs direction, the serf security, the craftsman opportunity, the citizen liberty, and the sovereign institutions. And our folly has been the post enlightenment effort to produce a monopoly economy instead of a monopoly rule of law and a market for economies given the various needs and abilities. We instinctually pursue consensus and numbers beyond the scale of their utility the same way we extend our perception of ethics, economics, and physics beyond the scale of human perception, and to the point of their failure. The maximum value of consensus is the law of reciprocity. Beyond that the maximum value of any given consensus is that which can be achieved by reciprocity. This is the lesson of the past two centuries. Tripartism was a western practice because like all else in western civilization it was an empirical observation of existential reality – not a comforting lie. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine. -
CONSENSUS PRODUCES MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIES FAIL TO SERVE MARKET DEMANDS (impor
CONSENSUS PRODUCES MONOPOLIES AND MONOPOLIES FAIL TO SERVE MARKET DEMANDS
(important)
We all need mindfulness in a method available to us.
We all need a strategy using methods and resources available to us.
We all need myths(narratives), ideologies (propaganda), philosophies(methods of reasoning), and sciences(methods of measurements) with which to decide how to act to pursue that strategy.
The reason being we marginally indifferent enough to communicate within limits and cooperate within limits.
But we are marginally different in our genetic, social, economic, physical, intellectual, and emotional abilities.
Different enough to require different mindfulness, strategies, and means of surviving, prospering, and enjoying.
So we are left with the problem of cooperating on means, despite different ends, and despite different genetic, social, economic, physical intellectual, and emotional abilities.
And the only way to do so is markets of voluntary reciprocity at every scale from association to production to reproduction to commons to polities to nations.
And the only way to facilitate that is multiple economies slave(prisoner), serf(laborer), freeman(craftsman), citizen(managerial), sovereign(executive).
Because the slave needs direction, the serf security, the craftsman opportunity, the citizen liberty, and the sovereign institutions.
And our folly has been the post enlightenment effort to produce a monopoly economy instead of a monopoly rule of law and a market for economies given the various needs and abilities.
We instinctually pursue consensus and numbers beyond the scale of their utility the same way we extend our perception of ethics, economics, and physics beyond the scale of human perception, and to the point of their failure.
The maximum value of consensus is the law of reciprocity.
Beyond that the maximum value of any given consensus is that which can be achieved by reciprocity.
This is the lesson of the past two centuries.
Tripartism was a western practice because like all else in western civilization it was an empirical observation of existential reality – not a comforting lie.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 00:03:00 UTC
-
Untitled
http://taxplancalculator.com/
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 21:54:00 UTC
-
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really). A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k. Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does. So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M. Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year. Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars. The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage. The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government. -
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really). A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k. Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does. So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M. Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year. Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars. The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage. The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government. -
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks
That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really).
A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k.
Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does.
So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M.
Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year.
Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars.
The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage.
The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 16:55:00 UTC