Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Do Rising Us Stock Markets Translate Into A Higher Quality Of Life For More Americans?

    The stock market does not represent the economy. If the stock market DOES represent the economy, then monetary policy is too loose and the stock market will act as the indicator that a correction of that monetary policy is in place – by correcting. So it’s better to treat the stock market as a canary in a coal mine that senses extremes.

    Think of the economy as an enormous school of fish, or flock of birds, that has incentives both to stay near one another, to follow others who have found opportunities, and to ‘defect’ (branch off) if they find counter-opportunities.

    Bad monetary policy that is used to inflate employment, by artificial stimulation of demand,

    The primary value of the stock market is providing an alternative store of value given that the government is constantly destroying the value of money through inflation.

    The secondary value of the stock market is that because the financial sector must desperately seek returns in order to prevent the governments’ destruction of value, the money is reinvested in increasingly risky possibilities stimulating innovation and risk taking.

    The third value is that some of these infinitely risky possibilities are what we call ‘startups’ that produce technological innovations that has been the chief contribution of american society to the world economy. And the possibility of going public and ‘winning the economic lottery’ by doing so, provides the lottery effect, that although few people win, many people ‘play’, and this generates economic opportunity.

    Now, I can also list all the bad things. But I’ll leave that for another post.

    How does this affect the average american? Quality of Life? Well, that’s a very … troublesome term. It’s like happiness. We can’t measure it, because it’s dependent upon the individual, not the polity. We can however measure standard of living, which means the resources available to the individuals prior to their mixture of good and bad decisions.

    And the evidence speaks for itself.

    yes.

    There is a reason that americans have the stock market and produce technology. There is a reason that london holds the bond market, and produces financing. There is a reason that germany masters capital production. There is a reason that russia masters military production.

    Those reasons are the differences in risk tolerance and the sensitivity to failure of each of the polities.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-rising-US-stock-markets-translate-into-a-higher-quality-of-life-for-more-Americans

  • It has absolutely nothing to do with ‘responsibility’ (Nor did Dick’s decision)

    It has absolutely nothing to do with ‘responsibility’ (Nor did Dick’s decision) but with insurance premiums, and the success of online shaming, in causing women (who control 80% of expenditure) to virtue signal one another.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 03:22:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970137307742457856

    Reply addressees: @JoeNBC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968916491851763712


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ScarboroughNow

    Given recent polling, this is not the expression of “liberal leanings” but rather companies aligning themselves with mainstream views overwhelmingly supported by Americans. https://t.co/yZ7KBVzrUq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968916491851763712

  • Comparative advantage is not open to infinite extrapolation. At some point the t

    Comparative advantage is not open to infinite extrapolation. At some point the the lowest standard of living reduces all others to the same. There is little left to conspicuously consume other than virtue signals (which is what you’re doing).The low hanging fruit has been picked.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 03:09:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970134162823892992

    Reply addressees: @NoahCRothman @JoeNBC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969693955192389633


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969693955192389633

  • No. Debate me. You’re trapped in mid 20th century thought when the west had an a

    No. Debate me. You’re trapped in mid 20th century thought when the west had an advantage in every form of capital postwar. Those advantages have dissipated with the 20th century. Cherry Picking Velocity rather than Capital was a convenient postwar pseudoscience. No longer.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-04 03:07:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970133598564241409

    Reply addressees: @JoeNBC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969954975928455168


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ScarboroughNow

    China is focused on dominating the next century. Donald Trump wants to drag America back into the last century—economically, racially and culturally. https://t.co/8iKQ8Dnb5A

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969954975928455168

  • Words, Beliefs, Actions, Consequential Incentives, And Consequences Of Following Those Incentives.

    a) there is a vast difference between what is said, what is believed, what is practiced, and the consequences of what is said, believed, and practiced, because of the malincentives it produces. b)if god is truth, then why lie? The evidence is that god of abraham in his three forms is evil, and all men are slaves. Is that why we must lie? c) then why use a mythos against the empirical, military and commercial aristocracy that created prosperity, instead of the fictionalist (lying) priestly aristocracy that failed their people? The pattern between the old defeat of civilizations, and the new defeat of civilizations is rather obvious in retrospect. Humans do not want truth. They resist it at every opportunity. They just want, period. And they excuse any means of obtaining their wants.
  • WORDS, BELIEFS, ACTIONS, CONSEQUENTIAL INCENTIVES, AND CONSEQUENCES OF FOLLOWING

    WORDS, BELIEFS, ACTIONS, CONSEQUENTIAL INCENTIVES, AND CONSEQUENCES OF FOLLOWING THOSE INCENTIVES.

    a) there is a vast difference between what is said, what is believed, what is practiced, and the consequences of what is said, believed, and practiced, because of the malincentives it produces.

    b)if god is truth, then why lie? The evidence is that god of abraham in his three forms is evil, and all men are slaves. Is that why we must lie?

    c) then why use a mythos against the empirical, military and commercial aristocracy that created prosperity, instead of the fictionalist (lying) priestly aristocracy that failed their people?

    The pattern between the old defeat of civilizations, and the new defeat of civilizations is rather obvious in retrospect.

    Humans do not want truth.

    They resist it at every opportunity.

    They just want, period.

    And they excuse any means of obtaining their wants.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 08:35:00 UTC

  • (to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi

    (to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.
  • (to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi

    (to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.
  • (to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi

    (to paul krugman via twitter)

    What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 22:09:00 UTC

  • What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic p

    What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:20:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968838235374923777

    Reply addressees: @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059


    IN REPLY TO:

    @paulkrugman

    Merchants of death watch, more or less literally: the reason FedEx won’t drop its special deals with the NRA is that it makes a lot of money shipping guns https://t.co/3Fd4HnXV3J

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059